02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.05: PALLIATIVE CARE/ETHICS<br />

QUALITY OF LIFE, OTHERS –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.05-017 SURVIVOR GUILT: THE SECRET BURDEN OF LUNG<br />

CANCER SURVIVORSHIP<br />

Tara Perloff 1 , Megan Johnson Shen 2 , Kate Abramson 1 , Jennifer King 1 , Kay<br />

Bayne 1<br />

1 Science and Research, Lung Cancer Alliance, Washington/DC/United States of<br />

America, 2 Psychology in Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York/NY/United<br />

States of America<br />

Background: The 5-year observed survival rate for a stage IV non-small cell<br />

lung cancer patient is less than five percent. Such a small survival rate begs<br />

the questions of how these survivors might feel. Many survivors feel a<br />

deep-seated sense of guilt; a phenomenon known as survivor guilt. The goal<br />

of the present study was to identify the prevalence of survivor guilt among<br />

lung cancer patients, while also pinpointing themes among those who are<br />

affected. Methods: A questionnaire containing a subset of the published<br />

IGQ-67 Interpersonal Guilt Questionnaire was completed via Survey Monkey<br />

by 108 respondents. Respondents were also given a definition of survivor<br />

guilt with an open-ended question on their feelings toward surviving lung<br />

cancer when others did not. Qualitative analysis was conducted on openended<br />

text responses for respondents with the most measured survivor<br />

guilt. After key qualitative themes were established from the initial survey,<br />

focus groups were held in survivors who experienced high and low levels of<br />

survivor guilt to further explore the themes. Results: This study indicates<br />

that a significant amount of survivor guilt is experienced among lung cancer<br />

survivors. 55% of respondents identified as having experienced survivor<br />

guilt, yet 63.9% of respondents scored above average on the IGQ-67 Survivor<br />

Guilt Scale. Qualitative analysis established five recurring themes among<br />

25% of respondents with the highest measured survivor guilt. Targeted focus<br />

groups revealed further commonalities among those with high and low levels<br />

of measured survivor guilt. Conclusion: This study identifies the prevalence<br />

of survivor guilt in lung cancer survivors and shows survivor guilt as a major<br />

psychosocial challenge. Further research across all cancer types must be<br />

explored in order to develop effective coping mechanisms for sufferers. This<br />

study develops the basis for future research directions in creating tools to<br />

identify, assess and treat survivor guilt in survivors of all cancers.<br />

= 0.470) nor between sarcopenic (218 days) and non-sarcopenic patients (209<br />

days). Conclusion: Cachexia and sarcopenia were not found to be predictors<br />

of chemotoxicity nor TTP. CT scan is a reliable method for obtaining and<br />

calculating muscle area, easily measurable, reproducible and usable without<br />

expensive software technology in everyday practice.<br />

Keywords: cancer cachexia, sarcopenia, NSCLC, predicitive value<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.05: PALLIATIVE CARE/ETHICS<br />

QUALITY OF LIFE, OTHERS –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.05-019 PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED LUNG CANCER: WHAT DO<br />

THEY KNOW, WHAT WOULD THEY LIKE TO KNOW, WHAT SHOULD<br />

THEY KNOW ABOUT THEIR DISEASE<br />

Annelies Janssens 1 , Sofie Derijcke 2 , Elke Vandenbroucke 3 , Anneke Lefebure 4 ,<br />

Veerle Surmont 5 , Dieter Coeman 6 , Daniëlle Galdermans 7 , Ann-Marie Morel 8 ,<br />

Birgitta Hiddinga 9 , Jan Van Meerbeeck 1<br />

1 <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong>, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem/Belgium, 2 Azgroeninge,<br />

Kortrijk/Belgium, 3 Az Monica, Deurne/Belgium, 4 Zna Ster, Borgerhout/Belgium,<br />

5 Ghent University, Ghent/Belgium, 6 Sint Dimpna Ziekenhuis, Geel/Belgium, 7 Zna<br />

Middelheim, Antwerpen/Belgium, 8 Sint-Jozefkliniek Bornem & Willebroek, Bornem/<br />

Belgium, 9 Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem/Belgium<br />

Background: The treating oncologist has to take up the responsibilty fot at<br />

least a part of the EPC process. Communication about the palliative setting<br />

is often a barrier for many physicians. We want to break this taboo by asking<br />

patients what they know and what they want to know about their cancer<br />

(treatment). Methods: In this multicentre study a questionnaire surveyed<br />

three domains of interest : perception of prognosis, presumed treatment goal<br />

and preferences about information regarding prognosis and end-of-life (EoL)<br />

care. Results: 64% of participants (N= 106) know they can’t be cured, only 45%<br />

know their treatment can’t cure them. Comparing treatment goals between<br />

patients who know their treatment cannot cure and patients who are likely to<br />

think that their treatment can cure them the former choose more QoL (39%<br />

versus 9%) and the latter cure (36% versus 13%)(Chi square = 17,7, p = .001). .<br />

Keywords: survivorship, survivor guilt, psychosocial, patient support<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.05: PALLIATIVE CARE/ETHICS<br />

QUALITY OF LIFE, OTHERS –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.05-018 ASSESSMENT OF SKELETAL MUSCLE MASS AS A<br />

PREDICITIVE FACTOR FOR CHEMOTHERAPY TOXICITY AND TTP IN<br />

ADVANCED NSCLC PATIENTS WITH CANCER CACHEXIA<br />

Drazena Srdic 1 , Sanja Plestina 1 , Ana Sverko-Peternac 2 , Nora Nikolac 3 , Ana<br />

Bacelic Gabelica 1 , Olivera Maletic 1 , Marko Jakopovic 1 , Miroslav Samarzija 1<br />

1 Department for Respiratory Diseases “Jordanovac”, University Hospital Centre<br />

Zagreb, Zagreb/Croatia, 2 Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,<br />

University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb/Croatia, 3 University<br />

Department of Chemistry, Medical School University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice,<br />

Zagreb/Croatia<br />

Background: Cancer cachexia and sarcopenia are frequently observed in<br />

cancer patients and associated with poor survival. We evaluated prevalence of<br />

cachexia and sarcopenia in NSCLC patients, relation to chemotherapy toxicity<br />

and time to tumor progression (TTP). Methods: In a prospective study we<br />

included 100 Caucasian patients with advanced NSCLC referred consecutively<br />

to our Department before starting 1st line platinum-doublet chemotherapy.<br />

Anthropometric and body composition measurements - total muscle cross<br />

sectional area, lumbar skeletal muscle index (LSMI) were done. Skeletal<br />

muscle cross-sectional area was measured at the third lumbar vertebra by<br />

CT scan, sarcopenia was defined using a previously published cut-off point,<br />

and TTP was specified. Results: Among 100 recruited patients 67 were male,<br />

median age 64 years, BMI 24.5±4.5, weight 68±15 kg, weight loss in previous<br />

6 months 7±6 kg (9.4±7.7%), 55 patients had CT images that met the criteria<br />

for analysis. Median total muscle cross-sectional area at L3 was 142.97±35.64<br />

cm 2 and median skeletal muscle index was 52.03 cm 2 /m 2 . Male patients had<br />

statistically significant higher lumbar skeletal muscle area and LSMI than<br />

female (53.31 vs. 40.95 cm 2 /m 2 , P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!