02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

(n=78) with squamous histological subtype, 43.5% (n=60) were ex-smoker and<br />

50.3% (n=74) had Stage I disease. PD-L1 positivity vs negativity among nonsmoker,<br />

ex-smoker and current smoker were 13.0% vs 20.9%, 47.8% vs 43.3%<br />

and 39.1% vs 35.8% respectively, (p=0.708). PD-L1 expression by IHC was<br />

significantly higher in squamous NSCLC compared to non-squamous NSCLC<br />

(34.7% vs 14.6%, p=0.030). We also noted increased PD-L1 positivity with<br />

rising tumor T stage (T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4: 7.1% vs 30.6% vs 0% vs 60%, p=0.023)<br />

and grade of differentiation (G1 vs G2 vs G3: 11.1% vs 19.6% vs 44%, p=0.039).<br />

There was no correlation between nodal status and PD-L1 expression (N0 vs<br />

N1 vs N2: 25.5% vs 25% vs 26.3%, p=0.995). PD-L1 expression appears to be<br />

independent of overall disease stage (I vs II vs III: 27.3% vs 22.7% vs 25.0%,<br />

p=0.921). The median overall survival for PD-L1 positive vs negative pts was<br />

22.1 vs 20.8 months with HR of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.34-1.12, p=0.123). Overall<br />

survival rates of pts with PD-L1 positive vs negative tumors at 2 years were<br />

47.8% vs 44.8% and at 5 years were 43.5% vs 26.9%. Conclusion: In our cohort,<br />

PD-L1 expression was not associated with poorer survival among resected<br />

NSCLC pts. Tumour size and grade of differentiation appear to correlate with<br />

PD-L1 expression which warrants further validation in future studies.<br />

POSTER SESSION 2 – P2.01: BIOLOGY/PATHOLOGY<br />

IMMUNE MECHANISMS IN THORACIC CANCER AND TARGETED THERAPY –<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016<br />

P2.01-067 THE RELEVANCE OF CEA AND CYFRA21-1 AS PREDICTIVE<br />

FACTORS IN NIVOLUMAB TREATED ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL<br />

LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) PATIENTS<br />

Maria Giovanna Dal Bello 1 , Rosangela Filiberti 2 , Erka Rijavec 1 , Carlo Genova 1 ,<br />

Giulia Barletta 1 , Giovanni Rossi 1 , Federica Biello 1 , Roberta Distefano 1 , Anna<br />

Maria Orengo 1 , Angela Alama 1 , Simona Coco 1 , Irene Vanni 2 , Michele Mussap 1 ,<br />

Francesco Grossi 1<br />

1 Lung Cancer Unit, San Martino Hospital - National Institute for Cancer Research,<br />

Genova/Italy, 2 Clinical Epidemiology, San Martino Hospital - National Institute for<br />

Cancer Research, Genova/Italy<br />

Background: CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE are tumor markers acknowledged as<br />

useful predictors of response to chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma,<br />

squamous and small-cell lung cancer, respectively. However, their role in<br />

cancer immunotherapy needs to be investigated. Methods: We analyzed 56<br />

patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab (3 mg/kg) every 14<br />

days within a single-institutional translational research study. Blood samples<br />

were collected at baseline and at each cycle up to 5 cycles, and then every two<br />

cycles. All patients underwent a CT-scan every 4 cycles and responses were<br />

classified according to RECIST and Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC).<br />

The serum level of CEA was measured with a Chemiluminescent Microparticle<br />

Immunoassay while CYFRA21-1 and NSE with an Immuno Radiometric Assay.<br />

The markers levels at baseline and after 4 cycles were used to analyze the<br />

relationship between their median variation and the objective response rate<br />

(ORR). The performance of tumor markers in predicting ORR was analyzed by<br />

ROC analysis and a reduction of 20% was used as cut-off level. Results: Fortyeight<br />

patients were evaluated: median age: 71 years (44-85); male/female:<br />

73%/27%; current or former smokers: 87.5%; non-squamous/squamous<br />

histology: 79%/21%. Baseline median levels were 4.8 ng/ml for CEA, 3.47 ng/<br />

ml for CYFRA21-1 and 7.51 ng/ml for NSE. At baseline, values over the upper<br />

normal limit of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE were detected in 23 (48%), 26 (54%),<br />

and 7 (14%) patients respectively. Significant differences were observed<br />

between responders and non-responders and CEA variation (-9% vs.+41%,<br />

p=0.003 for RECIST; -10% vs.+31%, p=0.015 for irRC), CYFRA21-1variation<br />

(-39% vs.+92%, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!