02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

time was 22.5 months (range 3-149 months). The duration of survival depends<br />

on histological type of primary tumor (21 months for patients with bone<br />

or soft tissue sarcoma and 46 months for patients with epithelial tumors).<br />

The survival time appeared to be shorter for patients with bilateral process<br />

than unilateral but the difference was not statistically significant (23 and<br />

48 months, respectively, p=0.25). Conclusion: The development of distant<br />

metastases is associated with extremely poor survival of patients with<br />

sarcomas and epithelial tumors. Based on our observation we suggest that<br />

some patients with multiple lung metastases can benefit from aggressive<br />

surgical treatment. The controlled, prospective, large-scale clinical studies are<br />

required to further assess impact of surgical treatment on survival of these<br />

patients.<br />

Keywords: laser, lung metastases, Surgery<br />

Conclusion: The measurement of pCRP+pCEA together represents an accurate<br />

and easy to perform tool useful in differentiating between benign and<br />

malignant PE, and should be suggested in all cancer patients requiring PE<br />

analysis.<br />

Keywords: C-reactive protein, malignant pleural effusion, lung metastases,<br />

Pleural CEA<br />

POSTER SESSION 2 – P2.05: RADIOTHERAPY<br />

Biology –<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016<br />

POSTER SESSION 2 – P2.04: MESOTHELIOMA/THYMIC MALIGNANCIES/ESOPHAGEAL<br />

CANCER/OTHER THORACIC MALIGNANCIES<br />

ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AND OTHER MALIGNANCIES –<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016<br />

P2.04-054 PLEURAL CEA AND C-REACTIVE PROTEIN IN PATIENTS<br />

WITH LUNG METASTASES AND MALIGNANT PLEURAL EFFUSION.<br />

A PROSPECTIVE CASE-CONTROL STUDY<br />

Franco Lumachi 1 , Paolo Ubiali 2 , Renato Tozzoli 3 , Alessandro Del Conte 4 ,<br />

Stefano Basso 2<br />

1 Department of Surgery, <strong>Oncology</strong> & Gastroenterology, University of Padua, School<br />

of Medicine, Padova/Italy, 2 Department of Surgery, General Surgery, S. Maria Degli<br />

Angeli Hospital, Pordenone/Italy, 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical<br />

Pathology Laboratory, S. Maria Degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone/Italy, 4 Medical<br />

<strong>Oncology</strong>, S. Maria Degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone/Italy<br />

Background: Malignant pleural effusion (PE) is common cancer patients, and<br />

may require invasive investivations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the<br />

diagnostic utility of pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (pCEA) and pleural<br />

C-reactive protein (pCRP) assay in cancer patients with PE. Methods: We<br />

prospectively measured both pCEA and pPCR in 41 consecutive patients with a<br />

history of cancer and PE (cases). Controls were 41 age- and sex-matched<br />

patients with confirmed benign PE. There were 52 (63.4%) men and 39 (47.6%)<br />

women, with an overall median age of 71 years (range 40-88 years). Results:<br />

The age (p=0.943) and male-to-female ratio (p=0.254) did not differ<br />

significantly between groups. pCEA (34.9±104.8 vs. 1.5±1.3 ng/mL; p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!