02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

had received 2, 3 and > 3 prior lines of therapy, respectively. Response was<br />

evaluable in 204 patients: with a median number of 8 doses (range, 1–24) and<br />

a median follow-up of 5.1 months, the disease control rate was 47%, with 3<br />

patients (1%) in complete response, 30 patients (14%) in partial response and<br />

66 patients (32%) in stable disease. 36 patients (17%) were treated beyond<br />

RECIST-defined progression, with 11 of them achieving disease control. As<br />

of April 2016, median progression-free survival and median overall survival<br />

were respectively 3.8 and 11.2 months. 117/210 patients (55.7%) discontinued<br />

treatment for any reason except toxicity; 11 out of 210 (5.2%) discontinued<br />

due to AEs. Conclusion: These findings showed that nivolumab provided<br />

clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced,<br />

refractory Sq-NSCLC. These data suggest that nivolumab can be a treatment<br />

option for patients failing more than one line of chemotherapy.<br />

Keywords: NSCLC squamous, heavily pre-treated, Nivolumab<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02C: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

IT CLINICAL –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02C-093 A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER,<br />

PHASE III STUDY, COMPARING RHTPO WITH RHIL-11 TREATING CIT<br />

(NCT02344979)<br />

Shun Lu 1 , Xia Song 2 , Fang Du 3 , Li Liu 4 , Yun Xu 1 , Zhi Ma 5 , Qiong Zhao 6 , Yi<br />

Zhang 7 , Hai Liu 8<br />

1 Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong<br />

University, Shanghai/China, 2 Respiratory Medicine, Shanxi Cancer Hospital,<br />

Taiyuan/China, 3 Dongyang People’s Hospital, Zhejiang Dongyang/China, 4 Wuhan<br />

Union Hospital, Hubei Wuhan/China, 5 Henan Cancer Hospital, Henan Zhengzhou/<br />

China, 6 The First Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Hangzhou/China,<br />

7 Zhejiiang Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang Hangzhou/China, 8 Jilin Oil Field General<br />

Hospital, Jilin Songyuan/China<br />

Background: Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common<br />

dose limiting toxicity of clinical chemotherapy drugs, which may lead<br />

to reduced dose chemotherapy or delay chemotherapy time, and even<br />

terminate chemotherapy treatment. This is the first randomized, openlabel,<br />

multicenter, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety<br />

of prophylactic treatment for thrombocytopenia in China. We tried to<br />

investigate the efficacy and safety of preventive application with rhTPO or<br />

rhIL-11 to protect against CIT in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)<br />

patients. Methods: From June 2009 to July 2016, 108 patients with NSCLC<br />

who were receiving the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy suffered<br />

from severe thrombocytopenia(the nadir of platelet counts0.05). rhTPO<br />

(15000U/d) was injected subcutaneously on the 2 nd , 4 th , 6 th , 9 th Day after the<br />

initiation of chemotherapy, and IL-11(3mg/d) was injected subcutaneously<br />

per day from Day 9 to Day15 after the initiation of chemotherapy. Blood<br />

routines were conducted to test before chemotherapy initiation and the<br />

3 th , 5 th , 7 th , 9 th , 11 th , 13 th , 15 th , 17 th , and 21 th day after chemotherapy. Toxicity<br />

and efficacy were monitored. Results: In the following chemotherapy cycle<br />

there were no statistical difference between rhTPO arm and rhIL-11 arm<br />

on the following indexes: the nadir of platelet counts(62.6±39.4×10 9 /L vs.<br />

52.8±36.8×10 9 /L, P>0.05), the maximum platelet counts (223.5±127.3×10 9 /L<br />

vs. 245.8±158.7×10 9 /L, P>0.05), duration of platelet counts less than<br />

50×10 9 /L[Median (95%CI): 4.0(3.0-5.0) days vs. 4.5(3.0-9.0) days, P>0.05],<br />

time of platelet count recovered to 75×10 9 /L [Median(95%CI): 5(3-7) days vs.<br />

6(4-8) days, P>0.05] and to 100×10 9 /L[median(95%CI): 6(6-8) days vs. 6(5-9)<br />

days, P>0.05]. Drug-related adverse events in rhTPO arm were less than those<br />

of rhIL-11 arm (5 cases (6.49%) in rhTPO arm, 8 cases (25.8%) in rhIL-11 arm,<br />

P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!