02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

Ib/II 51/49%, squamous/non 30%/70%, wedge/lobectomy/pneumonectomy<br />

8/76/16%, adjuvant chemotherapy 46%. Adherence to 4 interventions in 2<br />

y: clinic visits 62%, CT scans 18%, visit and/or CT 67%. Multivariate analysis<br />

(MVA) for predictors of guideline adherence demonstrated only stage was<br />

significant. Recurrence rate was 46% at 2 y with patterns of recurrence and<br />

treatment in table 1. Surveillance below vs per/above guidelines; PFS 26.6 m vs<br />

22 m (p=0.54), OS 47 m vs 41.8 m (p=0.27).<br />

Recurrence within<br />

2 years<br />

Method of<br />

detection<br />

Follow up<br />

visits and/or<br />

CT scans below<br />

guidelines n=87<br />

Follow up visits<br />

and/or CT scans<br />

per or above<br />

guidelines<br />

n=176<br />

32 (37%) 88 (50%)<br />

Surveillance 18 (56%) 41 (47%)<br />

Patient 14 (44%) 47 (53%)<br />

Distribution of<br />

recurrence<br />

Second primary 1 (3%) 2 (2%)<br />

Locoregional<br />

recurrence only<br />

10 (31%) 14 (16%)<br />

Metastatic 21 (66%) 73 (82%)<br />

Curative intent<br />

treatment at<br />

recurrence<br />

Palliative<br />

chemotherapy<br />

p<br />

value<br />

0.41<br />

0.16<br />

5 (16%) 6 (7%) 0.16<br />

7/27 (26%) 32/82 (39%) 0.25<br />

Conclusion: Compliance with follow up recommendations for resected NSCLC<br />

was 67% in our study. Guideline conformity did not increase the rate of<br />

curative intent therapy at recurrence due to metastatic presentation nor did<br />

it increase the proportion of patients treated with palliative chemotherapy.<br />

Better adjuvant treatment and surveillance options need to be developed for<br />

resected NSCLC.<br />

Keywords: Surveillance, recurrence, guidelines, Post operative NSCLC<br />

POSTER SESSION 1 - P1.05: EARLY STAGE NSCLC<br />

MISCELLANEOUS –<br />

MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016<br />

P1.05-061 INCREASED TREATMENT-RELATED TOXICITY IN<br />

PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER<br />

AND CO-EXISTING INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE<br />

Hanbo Chen 1 , Alexander Louie 1 , Esther Nossent 2 , Gabe Boldt 3 , David Palma 1 ,<br />

Suresh Senan 4<br />

1 Radiation <strong>Oncology</strong>, London Health Sciences Centre, London/ON/Canada, 2 VU<br />

University Medical Center, Amsterdam/Netherlands, 3 Library Services, London<br />

Regional Cancer Program, London/ON/Canada, 4 Radiation <strong>Oncology</strong>, VU University<br />

Medical Center, Amsterdam/Netherlands<br />

Background: Treatment options for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer<br />

(ES-NSCLC) are generally well-tolerated. Minimally-invasive surgical<br />

techniques, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and radiofrequency<br />

ablation (RFA) can all achieve post-treatment mortality of grade 3 was 12%, 25%, 25%, 12.5% and<br />

20%, respectively. For patients treated with surgery, 5-year overall survival<br />

(OS) was 31.4% to 61.6% (median 54.2%) for patients with ILD and 70.5% to<br />

88.3% (median 83.0%) for patients without ILD. For medically inoperable<br />

patients treated with SABR, 2 to 3-year OS was 0% to 53.8% (median 48.8%)<br />

for patients with ILD and 54% to 86.7% (median 70.8%) for patients without<br />

ILD. Studies that included only patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis<br />

reported higher treatment-related toxicity compared to other studies.<br />

Conclusion: An elevated level of treatment-related toxicity is observed in<br />

patients treated for ES-NSCLC with co-existing ILD. Medically inoperable<br />

patients experienced high levels of treatment-related mortality. For surgery<br />

and SABR, overall survival was worse for patients with ILD compared to those<br />

without ILD.<br />

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, Surgery, stereotactic ablative radiation<br />

therapy, non-small cell lung cancer<br />

POSTER SESSION 1 - P1.05: EARLY STAGE NSCLC<br />

MISCELLANEOUS –<br />

MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016<br />

P1.05-062 IS LUNG MICROWAVE THERMOABLATION A VALID<br />

ALTERNATIVE TO SURGERY IN HIGH RISK PATIENTS? A PROPENSITY<br />

MATCH ANALYSIS<br />

Paolo Mendogni 1 , Davide Tosi 1 , Alessandro Palleschi 1 , Lorenzo Rosso 1 , Ilaria<br />

Righi 1 , Matteo Montoli 1 , Francesco Damarco 1 , Claudia Bareggi 2 , Cristina<br />

Marenghi 3 , Mario Nosotti 1<br />

1 <strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery and Lung Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda<br />

- Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan/Italy, 2 <strong>Oncology</strong>, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’<br />

Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan/Italy, 3 Anesthesiology and Critical<br />

Care, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan/Italy<br />

Background: Surgery is considered the best treatment in Stage I non small<br />

cell lung cancer. Local non–surgical therapies (radiotherapy, thermoablation)<br />

are becoming valid alternative to surgery in high risk patients (poor cardiac<br />

or pulmonary function, elderly patients). Methods: Patients submitted in<br />

our Department to Microwave thermoablation (MW) were compared with a<br />

cohort of patient submitted to lung lobectomy in the same period of time,<br />

abstracted from our database with a propensity match method. The study<br />

was retrospective on data recorded prospectively. Primary endpoint was<br />

overall survival. Results: From June 2009 to October 2014 in our Department,<br />

36 patients underwent MW for Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)<br />

or lung metastasis. From our database were abstracted 41 patients with<br />

a propensity match method, submitted to lung lobectomy. Two groups<br />

were comparable by age, diagnosis, stage and gender. MW group resulted<br />

elder than Surgery group (75,5 vs 72,2 years; p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!