02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

lung cancer adenocarcinoma. Methods: In this retrospective, unicentric<br />

study we assigned 41 patients by convenience with lung adenocarcinoma<br />

in advanced clinical stage of the disease to receive afatinib or gefitinib as<br />

second or third line treatment. The primary end point of our trial is to describe<br />

progression free survival and global survival outcomes in patients that receive<br />

TKIs as second or third line therapy. Secondary end points were time elapsed<br />

from the beginning of TKIs to the time of response by RECIST 1.1, and toxicity<br />

between the two groups. Conflict of interest: Boehringer Ingelheim donated<br />

Afatinib and The National Institute of Respiratory Diseases in Mexico donated<br />

Gefitinib. Results: From 120 patients, 41 of them were selected to receive TKIs<br />

by convenience. The progression free survival with afatinib PFS was 11 months<br />

and 10 months for gefitinib, with no significant difference in both therapeutic<br />

groups (HR 0.79, p=0.173). There is a reduction in 2 years mortality in favor of<br />

afatinib (HR 0.69, p=0.046). There were no significant differences between<br />

afatinib and gefitinib in response rate, also there were no differences by<br />

RECIST 1.1. We observed more incidence of mucositis in the group treated<br />

with afatinib (HR 0.58, p=0.006) and metastasis to CNS at diagnosis observed<br />

in afatinib group (p= 0.029). Conclusion: There was a reduction in 2 years<br />

mortality with afatinib treatment compared with gefitinib. With the data<br />

obtained we can infer that TKIs show similar benefits in second and third line<br />

as if given at the beginning, with a good progression free survival, with no<br />

significant differences between afatinib or gefitinib.<br />

Keywords: TKIS treatment, NSCLC 2nd line treatment, EGFR mutation<br />

treatment<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02B: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

EGFR RES –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02B-108 ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL USABILITY OF A CFDNA-<br />

BASED ASSAY DETECTING EGFR T790M MUTATION IN EGFR-TKI<br />

REFRACTORY NSCLC PATIENTS<br />

Masaki Hanibuchi 1 , Akira Kanoh 2 , Takuya Kuramoto 2 , Hisatsugu Goto 1 ,<br />

Atsuro Saijo 1 , Hirokazu Ogino 1 , Yasuhiko Nishioka 1<br />

1 Department of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Institute of Biomedical<br />

Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima/Japan, 2 Biomarker<br />

Research, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co.,ltd., Tsukuba/Japan<br />

Background: Assessment of acquired resistant EGFR mutation T790M<br />

in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) in the plasma of EGFR-TKI treated NSCLC<br />

patients presents several challenges. Furthermore, the feasibility and<br />

required sensitivity of cfDNA-based detection methods in second-line therapy<br />

are not well elucidated. Here, we examined the cfDNA of patients for T790M<br />

and other activating mutations of EGFR to assess the clinical usability of such<br />

data for diagnosis purposes. Methods: cfDNAs were prepared from the plasma<br />

samples of 45 NSCLC patients who were confirmed as harboring activating<br />

EGFR mutations (exon19 deletion, N = 20; L858R, N = 23; and minor mutations,<br />

N = 2). EGFR mutations in cfDNA samples were detected using highly sensitive<br />

methods (NGS-utilizing ultra-deep sequencing, droplet digital PCR) and<br />

originally developed assays (BNA-clamped PCR/F-PHFA combined method,<br />

and BNA-clamped qPCR) and these results were compared to tissue-based<br />

definitive diagnoses. Results: No significant change was observed in amounts<br />

of extracted cfDNA among EGFR-TKI naïve (N = 18) and refractory (N = 27)<br />

groups. There was a positive significant correlation between the amount of<br />

cfDNA and diameter in target regions, suggesting that tumor volume reflects<br />

the amount of cfDNA. Significant negative correlation was observed between<br />

cfDNA amounts and PFS following EGFR-TKI treatment in the TKI-naïve group.<br />

The overall percentage agreement between cfDNA and tissue-based analyses<br />

ranged from 89 to100 % in major activating mutations and was approximately<br />

85% in T790M. Detected fragment number of each mutation in cfDNA<br />

samples by ultra-deep sequencing suggested that it caused the observed<br />

difference in the agreement rates between activating mutations and<br />

T790M. We confirmed the strong agreement between the high performance<br />

assays and definitive diagnosis when the same tissue samples were tested.<br />

Next, cfDNA genotyping results were compared to tissue-based definitive<br />

diagnosis. In the case of BNA-clamped qPCR, the positive percent agreement<br />

was 63% (26/41) in major activating mutations, whereas the negative<br />

percent agreement was 100% (45/45). T790M was detected in 46% (12/26)<br />

cfDNA samples derived from the EGFR-TKI refractory group. We performed<br />

re-biopsies in a proportion of enrolled patients and investigated the tissueplasma<br />

results concordance in matched samples. The observed overall percent<br />

agreement was 63% in case of T790M and 88% regarding exon19 deletions.<br />

Conclusion: Due to heterogeneity or other biological features of drug-treated<br />

tumors, the cfDNA assay feasibility of detecting T790M was more limited<br />

than that of detecting activating mutations. To assess the T790M status in<br />

EGFR-TKI refractory patients, tissue-based assay and cfDNA-based assay<br />

should be performed complementarily.<br />

Keywords: EGFR mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, circulating free DNA<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02B: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

EGFR RES –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02B-109 MOLECULAR PROFILING OF EGFR-POSITIVE NSCLC<br />

WITH SECONDARY T790M RESISTANCE MUTATION AND TERTIARY<br />

TRANSFORMATION INTO SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER<br />

Martin Faehling 1 , Anna-Lena Volckmar 2 , Albrecht Stenzinger 2 , Birgit<br />

Schwenk 1 , Sebastian Kramberg 1 , Jörn Sträter 3<br />

1 Klinik Für Kardiologie Und Pneumologie, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen/Germany,<br />

2 Institut Für Pathologie, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg/Germany,<br />

3 Pathologisches Institut, Esslingen/Germany<br />

Background: In advanced stage NSCLC, activating EGFR-mutations are<br />

prognostic and predictive factors for treatment with an EGFR-tyrosine<br />

kinase inhibitor (TKI). However, invariably, resistance to EGFR-TKI develops.<br />

Resistance is primarily driven by T790M mutations present in approximately<br />

50% of EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC at progression. A different mechanism<br />

of EGFR-TKI-resistance is transformation into SCLC which has been reported<br />

in very rare cases. Methods: Employing Sanger sequencing and targeted<br />

next generation sequencing, we performed full histopathological workup<br />

and molecular profiling of all tumor biopsies obtained during the course of<br />

disease. Both molecular and histopathological data were correlated with<br />

the clinical course. Results: We report the case of a 70 year old patient,<br />

ECOG 1, presenting with dyspnea and fatigue due to a predominantly acinar<br />

adenocarcinoma with extensive metastatic disease. Using Sanger sequencing,<br />

we detected a del Exon19-EGFR mutation. Based on fulfilled response criteria<br />

for EGFR-TKI therapy, erlotinib 150mg was initiated with rapid improvement<br />

of dyspnoe and fatigue. After one month, erlotinib was reduced to 100mg<br />

due to dermatotoxicity. After 5 weeks, CT showed partial remission. After<br />

4½ months, CT revealed mixed response with resolved pleural effusion but<br />

slowly progressive pulmonary metastases. The brain metastases present<br />

at diagnosis had regressed but a new lesion was detected. Due to ongoing<br />

clinical benefit, erlotinib was continued beyond progression. After 7 months,<br />

the patient deteriorated clinically (ECOG 2) with CT showing progression of<br />

all tumor sites including. FNAC of a progressive mediastinal lymph node was<br />

submitted for histopathological and molecular work-up. In parallel one cycle<br />

of systemic chemotherapy with carboplatin/gemcitabine was given, and<br />

cerebral radiation was delivered. Following detection of a T790M mutation,<br />

chemotherapy was stopped and therapy with osimertinib 80mg (CUP) was<br />

started with prompt improvement of the clinical state. CT after 6 weeks<br />

confirmed partial remission. However, 10 weeks later, the patient’s condition<br />

rapidly deteriorated. CT detected complete remission of brain metastasis but<br />

rapid progression of the primary tumor, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and<br />

hepatic metastases. An endobronchial kryobiopsy revealed small cell lung<br />

cancer as the underlying cause. EGFR analysis revealed the presence of the<br />

original exon19 mutation which had been present in the previous biopsies<br />

showing NSCLC histology. Complementing these preliminary results, a<br />

full molecular workup using next generation sequencing is currently being<br />

performed across all biopsies and will be presented. Conclusion: Integrated<br />

analysis of clinical, histopathological and molecular characteristics reveals<br />

tumor evolution over time and leads to highly individual therapeutic<br />

management benefiting the patient.<br />

Keywords: T790M, SCLC, 3rd generation EGFR-TKI<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02B: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

EGFR RES –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02B-110 ROS1 TRANSLOCATION AS A BYSTANDER MUTATION IN<br />

T790M EGFR MUTATED NSCLC<br />

Jan Stratmann 1 , Joerg Kriegsmann 2 , Bernd Sulzbach 3 , Bernd Thöming 4 ,<br />

Hubert Serve 1 , Martin Sebastian 1<br />

1 Med2, Universitätsklinik Frankfurt Am Main, Frankfurt/Germany,<br />

2 Wissenschaftspark Trier, Trier/Germany, 3 Pneumologische Gemeinschaftspraxis<br />

Offenbach, Offenbach/Germany, 4 Ketteler Krankenhaus, Offenbach/Germany<br />

Background: Non small cell lung cancer comprises a number of subtypes that<br />

are defined by genetic alterations in terms of oncogenic driving mechanisms<br />

that constitute groundwork for the development of targeted therapy. EGFR<br />

mutations, as well as ROS1 translocations are two well described genetic<br />

alterations with prognostic and therapeutic implications and almost mutually<br />

exclusive occurance. Activating mutations in the EGF receptor gene are found<br />

in approximately 10% of european patients and large clinical trials with anti<br />

EGFR–kinase inhibitors set EGFR-TKIs as the gold standard of treatment.<br />

However treatment failure obligatory occurs within 8–13months and T790M<br />

gatekeeping mutation is found in approximately 60% as the resistance<br />

mechanism. 3rd generation TKI Osimertinib is a highly active treatment<br />

Copyright © 2016 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer<br />

S661

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!