02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

(Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) or surgery or Stereotactic Radiosurgery<br />

(SRS) were examined. OS were compared to the expected OS according<br />

to the lung specific GPA score as described by Sperduto. Results: Ninetyeight<br />

patients (91%) had EGFR activating mutations, whereas 10 (9%) were<br />

undetermined. 69% of them were nonsmokers. 77/108 patients (71.3%)<br />

were woman. 53/108 patients (49%) had BM: 30 patients had synchronous<br />

BM whereas 23 patients had metachronous BM. 20/53 patients (38%) were<br />

treated with WBRT. BM is still a burden for NSCLC patients harbouring EGFR<br />

activating mutations, (median OS 42 vs 25.5 months, p = 0.0052). OS from<br />

BM diagnosis was significantly superior in patients with EGFR activating<br />

mutations, compared to the expected OS in accordance with Sperduto’s<br />

GPA score (1): group 0-1 (11.5 months IC 95% [8.5-25.7] vs 3.02 months IC 95%<br />

[2.63-3.84]); group 1.5-2 (28 months IC 95% [24.3-NR] vs 5.49 months IC 95%<br />

[4.83-6.40]) (p = 0.026). Among EGFR activating mutations, OS were also<br />

significantly longer in group 1.5-2 than in group 0-1 (28 vs 11.5 months) (p =<br />

0.026) Conclusion: Currently, Lung specific GPA is not accurate enough to<br />

estimate survival time for EGFR mutant patients. However, this tool is still<br />

reliable to distinguish different prognosis for patient with EGFR activating<br />

mutations, according to their GPA score. In conclusion, EGFR status modifies<br />

OS of patients and should be integrated in the items of the GPA score. These<br />

results should be validated in further prospective studies.<br />

Keywords: GPA score, brain metastases, EGFR mutation<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02B: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

EGFR BIOMARKERS –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02B-014 MONITORING OF T790M MUTATION IN SERUM FOR<br />

PREDICTION OF RESPONSE TO THIRD GENERATION INHIBITORS<br />

Teresa Morán 1 , Enric Carcereny 2 , Joaquim Bosch-Barrera 3 , Carles Mesia 4 ,<br />

Remedios Blanco 5 , Yolanda Garcia 6 , Diana Roa 3 , Elia Sais 3 , Eudald Felip 1 ,<br />

Cristina Queralt 7 , Itziar De Aguirre 7 , Jose Luis Ramirez 7 , Olga Fernandez 1 ,<br />

Rafael Rosell 7<br />

1 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Catalan Institute of <strong>Oncology</strong>-Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol,<br />

Badalona/Spain, 2 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Catalan Institute of <strong>Oncology</strong>-Hospital<br />

Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona/Spain, 3 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Ico-Girona, Girona/<br />

Spain, 4 Medica <strong>Oncology</strong>, Ico- Duran I Reynalds, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat,<br />

Barcelona/Spain, 5 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa - Hospital de<br />

Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona/Spain, 6 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Corporació Sanitària<br />

Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona/Spain, 7 Molecular Biology Laboratory of Cancer<br />

Dr. Rosell., Can Ruti Campus: Institute for Predictive and Personalized Medicine of<br />

Cancer (IMPPC)- Institut of Health Germans Trias I Pujol (IGTP). Catalan Institute of<br />

<strong>Oncology</strong> (ICO), Badalona, Barcelona/Spain<br />

Background: The emergence of T790M mutation (T790M) represents the<br />

main mechanism of acquired resistance (AR) to 1 st and 2 nd generation tyrosine<br />

kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR mutant patients (p). Recently, 3rd generation<br />

inhibitors (T790Mi) have demonstrated activity in EGFR mutant (mu) patients<br />

with AR to TKIs harboring T790M. Serum and plasma have been used as an<br />

alternative to tissue to detect both sensitizing EGFRmu and T790M. We<br />

evaluated if (1) T790M could be monitored along T790Mi therapy in p with<br />

baseline T790M in serum, (2) T790M loss could be correlated to clinical and<br />

radiographic response, and (3) T790M disappears soon in rapid responders.<br />

Methods: 10 p out of a total of 15 T790M+p treated with T790Mi were selected<br />

according the baseline T790M+ in serum. Baseline characteristics, data on<br />

changes in T790M in serum; and radiographic and symptom changes along<br />

T790Mi therapy were collected. T790M in serum was detected using a PNAlocked<br />

nucleic PCR clamp-based technique. T790M was evaluated at baseline<br />

and at certain times after T790Mi initiation. Results: 80% of the p were<br />

female and never smoker; 100% were adenocarcinoma, Caucasian, del19, and<br />

were treated with previous TKI, with a median (m) time to treatment failure<br />

of 11.25 months (mo) [range (r)1-19 mo]. P received 2 previous treatments<br />

(r1-6), 40% had a rebiopsy for T790M evaluation, had 3 metastatic sites (r1-6),<br />

and had a PS 1 in 70% of the cases. 5 p were evaluable for response with 2 SD<br />

and 3 PR as best response (BR) in the 1 st evaluation. 7 out of 9 p evaluable for<br />

clinical response, experienced an improvement in baseline symptoms as soon<br />

as 3 weeks (w) after starting T790Mi, only 1 p experienced an increase in pain,<br />

but not related to bone M1. T790M was lost in 80% of the p and it was not<br />

detected in serum at 3 or 6 w after the T790Mi initiation in 2 out of 4 and 4 out<br />

of 7 evaluable p, respectively. Conclusion:<br />

T790M detection can be lost early along T790Mi treatment.<br />

The decrease in symptom burden is seen in p with loss of T790M.<br />

PR and SD represent the BR in p with loss of T790M.<br />

The loss of T790M in the serum may be a marker of symptomatic and<br />

radiographic response to T790Mi.<br />

Future evaluation would demonstrate if the reappearance of T790M mutation<br />

in serum could be a marker of resistance to T790Mi.<br />

Keywords: EGFR mutations, serum, T790M, Monitoring<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02B: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

EGFR BIOMARKERS –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02B-015 IMPACT OF METASTATIC STATUS ON THE PROGNOSIS<br />

OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH FIRST GENERATION EGFR-TKIS<br />

Yoshihiko Taniguchi 1 , Akihiro Tamiya 1 , Kanako Katayama 1 , Tsunehiro Tanaka 1 ,<br />

Kenji Nakahama 1 , Nobuhiko Saijo 1 , Yoko Naoki 1 , Masaki Kanazu 2 , Naoki<br />

Omachi 1 , Kyoichi Okishio 3 , Takahiko Kasai 4 , Shinji Atagi 3<br />

1 Depertment of Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo<br />

Chest Medical Center, Sakai/Japan, 2 Depertment of Internal Medicine, National<br />

Hospital Organization Toneyama National Hospital, Toyonaka/Japan, 3 Depertment<br />

of Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest<br />

Medical Center, Sakai/Japan, 4 Department of Pathology, National Hospital<br />

Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai/Japan<br />

Background: First generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)<br />

tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib (GEF) or erlotinib (ERL)<br />

are effective for patients harboring EGFR mutations positive non-small cell<br />

lung cancer (NSCLC). To know the impact of metastatic status on patients<br />

treated with EGFR-TKIs is important. The objective of this study is to know<br />

the impact of metastatic status including brain metastasis, bone metastasis,<br />

liver metastasis and pleural effusion on the prognosis of patients treated<br />

with first generation EGFR-TKIs. Methods: The pathology files of National<br />

Hospital Organization Kinki-chuo Chest Medical Center from 2009 to 2014<br />

were retrospectively reviewed and 533 patients were EGFR mutation positive<br />

NSCLC. Patients with stage IA to IIIA and small cell lung cancer were excluded.<br />

From 299 stage IIIB, IV and relapsed NSCLC patients, 178 patients treated<br />

with GEF or ERL as first line treatment were enrolled for the study. Metastatic<br />

status, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response<br />

rate (RR) were investigated. We also evaluated the relationship between the<br />

number of metastatic organs and prognosis. Results: Fifty-one patients were<br />

male and median age at the time of first line treatment was 72 years (range<br />

39-91). Number of patients with adenocarcinoma was 168 and 156 patients<br />

were treated with GEF. In log-rank test, PFS and OS were significantly worse<br />

in patients with brain metastasis (8.0m vs 13.2m, p= 0.008; 20.2m vs 38.0m,<br />

p< 0.001 respectively), bone metastasis (8.8m vs 15.4m, p< 0.001; 24.0m vs<br />

32.1m, p= 0.020 respectively), liver metastasis (6.7m vs 12.5m, p< 0.001; 13.4m<br />

vs 32.1m, p< 0.001 respectively) and pleural effusion (10.8m vs 12.2m, p= 0.033;<br />

21.9m vs 34.9m, p= 0.004 respectively) at the time of first line treatment<br />

compared with patients without each metastasis. In cox proportional hazards<br />

models multivariate analysis, bone metastasis had correlated with worse PFS<br />

(HR 2.110, 95%CI 1.437-3.093, p< 0.001) and moreover, brain metastasis had<br />

correlated with worse OS (HR 2.414, 95%CI 1.464-3.951, p< 0.001). There were<br />

no relationships between metastatic status and RR. Furthermore, the much<br />

number of metastasized organs (no metastasis, 1 metastasis and 2 or more<br />

metastasis) was significantly related to worse PFS (19.3m vs 12.5m vs 6.6m, p<<br />

0.001) and OS (46.1m vs 29.9m vs 15.1m, p< 0.001). Conclusion: Bone metastasis<br />

had correlated with worse PFS and brain metastasis had correlated with<br />

worse OS in patients treated with first generation EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, the<br />

much number of metastasized organs was related to worse PFS and OS.<br />

Keywords: EGFR-TKI, metastasis, EGFR, NSCLC<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02B: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

EGFR BIOMARKERS –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02B-016 AN EXPLORATION STUDY OF MECHANISMS<br />

UNDERLYING PRIMARY RESISTANCE TO EGFR-TKIS IN PATIENTS<br />

HARBORING TKI-SENSITIVE EGFR MUTATIONS<br />

Ee Ke, Zhihong Chen, Jian Su, Xu-Chao Zhang, Longhua Guo, Feiyu Niu, Qiuyi<br />

Zhang, Chongrui Xu, Yi Long Wu, Qing Zhou<br />

Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute; Guangdong General Hospital(GGH)& Guangdong<br />

Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou/China<br />

Background: Primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs was generally defined as disease<br />

progression in less than 3 months without any evidence of objective response.<br />

Although possible mechanisms have been investigated in several preclinical<br />

and retrospective studies, little is known about the molecular backgrounds of<br />

primary resistance. Methods: Random Sample of Cases was used to screen<br />

TKI-sensitive patients to match with the primary resistant patients on the<br />

basis of clinical characteristics (smoking history, EGFR mutations etc.). DNA<br />

Copyright © 2016 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer<br />

S627

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!