02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

alone diagnosis on “neuroendocrine appearing” tumors performs well, but is<br />

improved in most cases by the judicious use of IHC in the diagnosis of SCLC,<br />

where histologic features are equivocal or when the pathologist wants to gain<br />

confidence.<br />

Keywords: SCLC, Pathology, Reproducibility, Immunohistochemistry<br />

PUB016 A MULTI-NATIONAL COHORT VALIDATION OF PROCEDURE–<br />

SPECIFIC NOMOGRAMS TO PREDICT RECURRENCE FOR SMALL<br />

LUNG ADENOCARCINOMAS<br />

Sarina Bains 1 , Takashi Eguchi 1 , Arne Warth 2 , Yi-Chen Yeh 3 , Jun-Ichi Nitadori 4 ,<br />

Kaitlin Woo 5 , Teh Ying Chou 3 , Hendrik Dienemann 6 , Thomas Muley 7 , Jun<br />

Nakajima 4 , Aya Shinozaki-Ushiku 8 , Yu-Chung Wu 9 , Kyuichi Kadota 10 , William<br />

Travis 11 , Kay See Tan 5 , David Jones 1 , Prasad Adusumilli 1<br />

1 <strong>Thoracic</strong> Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer<br />

Center, New York/NY/United States of America, 2 Institute of Pathology,<br />

Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg/Germany, 3 Department of Pathology<br />

and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei/Taiwan,<br />

4 Department of <strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo/Japan,<br />

5 Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New<br />

York/NY/United States of America, 6 Department of <strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery, Thoraxklinik<br />

at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg/Germany, 7 Translational Research<br />

Unit (Stf), Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (Tlrc), Member of the<br />

German Center for Lung Research (Dzl), Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University<br />

Hospital, Heidelberg/Germany, 8 Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo<br />

Hospital, Tokyo/Japan, 9 Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital,<br />

Taipei/Taiwan, 10 Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kagawa University, Kagawa/<br />

NY/Japan, 11 Dept of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York/<br />

NY/United States of America<br />

Background: The goal of this study was to construct and validate procedure–<br />

specific nomograms, using competing risk analysis, to predict recurrence<br />

following resection for lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) ≤2 cm. Methods:<br />

Nomogram development was performed using an internal cohort (N=909) of<br />

patients who underwent R0 resection for small LADC at our institution (Table<br />

1), and external validation was conducted using cohorts (N=708) from Japan,<br />

Taiwan, and Germany. Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) was assessed,<br />

treating death without recurrence as a competing risk. Nomograms for<br />

5-year-CIR were developed using significant prognostic factors from<br />

multivariable analyses and were evaluated internally using bootstrap<br />

validation. The predictive accuracy of the nomograms was measured using a<br />

concordance index (C-index). Results: Multivariable analyses identified six<br />

independent risk factors with the highest predictive accuracy for CIR in both<br />

the LO (lobectomy) and LR (limited resection) groups (Table 2). These variables<br />

were used to develop two nomograms with C-index of 0.747 for LO and 0.748<br />

for LR. The two nomograms were validated externally with high accuracy<br />

(C-index of 0.710 for LO and 0.796 for LR).Conclusion: The two procedure–<br />

specific nomograms with high C-indices can be used to predict recurrence and,<br />

thereby, better prognosticate and stratify patients with resected small LADC<br />

by outcomes.<br />

Keywords: Nomogram, STAS, Adenocarcinoma, competing risk<br />

PUB017 MINIMALLY INVASIVE LOBECTOMY IS ASSOCIATED WITH<br />

LOWER NONCANCER MORTALITY IN ELDERLY: A PROPENSITY-<br />

SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS<br />

Boris Hristov 1 , Takashi Eguchi 1 , James Isbell 1 , Bernard Park 1 , Kay See Tan 2 ,<br />

Valerie Rusch 1 , David Jones 1 , Prasad Adusumilli 1<br />

1 <strong>Thoracic</strong> Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,<br />

New York/NY/United States of America, 2 Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial<br />

Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York/NY/United States of America<br />

Background: Two-thirds of the patients with non-small cell lung cancer<br />

(NSCLC) are elderly (≥65 years). As age increases, the risk of competing events,<br />

such as noncancer death, increases. The aim of this study is to investigate<br />

cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality following lobectomy by minimally<br />

invasive surgery (MIS, includes VATS and robot-assisted resections) versus<br />

thoracotomy in elderly patients with NSCLC. Methods: Of 2208 patients<br />

who underwent curative-intent lobectomy for pStage I-III NSCLC without<br />

induction therapy (2000-2012), 1458 patients (66%) were ≥65 years of age<br />

and included in the analysis. Of these, 466 patients underwent MIS and<br />

992 underwent thoracotomy. Propensity-score matching was performed<br />

to identify pairs of thoracotomy and MIS patients with comparable clinical<br />

characteristics including types of comorbidities, pulmonary function,<br />

pathological stage, tumor size, and year of surgery. Association between<br />

surgical approach (MIS vs. thoracotomy) and cause-specific mortality analysis<br />

was performed using competing risks approach: Gray’s test to compare CID<br />

curves, and Fine and Gray’s test to quantify the effects of surgical approach.<br />

Results: Following propensity matching of patients who underwent<br />

thoracotomy (N=366) versus MIS (N=366), there were statistically significant<br />

differences in length of stay (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!