02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

<strong>Oncology</strong> Group Study JCOG0403. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93:989-96, 2015<br />

6. Guckenberger M, Klement RJ, Allgauer M, et al: Applicability of the linearquadratic<br />

formalism for modeling local tumor control probability in high<br />

dose per fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small<br />

cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 109:13-20, 2013 7. Huang K, Dahele M, Senan<br />

S, et al: Radiographic changes after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy<br />

(SABR) - Can we distinguish recurrence from fibrosis? A systematic review<br />

of the literature. Radiother Oncol 102:335-42, 2012 8. Peulen H, Mantel<br />

F, Guckenberger M, et al: Validation of High-Risk Computed Tomography<br />

Features for Detection of Local Recurrence After Stereotactic Body Radiation<br />

Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol<br />

Phys 96:134-41, 2016<br />

Keywords: stereotactic body radiotherapy, non-small cell lung cancer, early<br />

stage<br />

SC03: ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY<br />

MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />

SC03.02 PROTON THERAPY OF LUNG CANCER<br />

Jeffrey Bradley<br />

Radiation <strong>Oncology</strong>, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis/United<br />

States of America<br />

This session will focus on the use of proton beam radiation therapy for<br />

lung cancer. We will review the basic physics of proton beam therapy, why<br />

protons are different from photon-based radiation therapy, and the potential<br />

advantages of using proton beam therapy to treat lung cancer. We will review<br />

the current data about the use of protons, both published and unpublished,<br />

and provide updates about ongoing clinical trials testing proton therapy in<br />

lung cancer patients.<br />

Keywords: protons, radiation therapy, lung cancer, clinical trials<br />

SC03: ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY<br />

MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016 - 11:00-12:30<br />

SC03.03 CARBON-ION THERAPY OF LUNG CANCER<br />

Yuko Nakayama<br />

Department of Radiation <strong>Oncology</strong>, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama/Japan<br />

Introduction Approximately 65 particle therapy facilities are in operation<br />

worldwide. Among them, only 10 have carbon-ion therapy (CIRT) facilities (5 in<br />

Japan, 2 in Germany, 2 in China, and 1 in Italy), and the remainder have proton<br />

therapy facilities. More than 137,000 patients were treated with particle<br />

therapy worldwide from 1954 to 2014, including 15,000 in 2014, 86% of which<br />

were treated with protons and 14% with carbon ions and other particles.<br />

(from the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group: http://www.ptcog.ch/). The<br />

National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) Chiba, Japan, has been<br />

treating cancer with high-energy carbon ions since 1994. Most of the patients<br />

who have been cured of cancer worldwide with carbon ions were treated<br />

at NIRS (1). From NIRS’s data, the efficacy of CIRT for non-small cell lung<br />

cancer (NSCLC) has been suggested. Here those results are reviewed, and the<br />

issue of this modern technology is discussed. Characteristics of carbon-ion<br />

therapy CIRT has better dose distribution to tumor tissue, while minimizing<br />

surrounding normal tissue dose, compared with photon radiotherapy.<br />

Moreover, carbon ions have potential advantages over protons. They provide<br />

a better physical dose distribution due to lessened lateral scattering. Further,<br />

their higher relative biological effectiveness and lower oxygen enhancement<br />

ratio are desirable features for targeting radioresistant, hypoxic tumors.<br />

The difference between densely ionizing nuclei and sparsely ionising x-rays<br />

and protons offers further potential radiobiological advantages, such as<br />

reduced repair capacity, decreased cell-cycle dependence, and possibly<br />

stronger immunological responses. Carbon-ion therapy of early non-small<br />

cell lung cancer Surgical resection with lobectomy has been the standard<br />

treatment of choice for early-stage NSCLC. In a 2004 study of a Japanese lung<br />

cancer registry comprising 11,663 surgical cases, overall survival (OS) rates<br />

at 5 years for stages IA and IB disease are 82.0% and 66.8%, respectively<br />

(2). Radiotherapy is an option for patients who are not eligible for surgery<br />

or refuse it. Recently, hypofractionated radiotherapy is regarded as an<br />

alternative to surgery for localized NSCLC, using x-ray stereotactic body<br />

radiotherapy (SBRT) or particle therapy using protons or carbon-ions. With<br />

regard to CIRT, for peripheral stage I NSCLC, the number of fractions was<br />

reduced in different trials from 18 to 9, then 4, and finally to a single fraction<br />

at NIRS (Table 1). The results with CIRT in stage IA NSCLC are similar to the best<br />

SBRT results reported worldwide. For stage IB disease, CIRT results appear<br />

superior to those reported for photon SBRT in terms of local control and lung<br />

toxicity. Despite high local control, disease-specific survival is much lower in<br />

stage IB than in stage IA because distant metastatic recurrences are common.<br />

A combination of CIRT with systemic therapy is therefore essential to improve<br />

survival. CIRT demonstrates a better dose distribution than both SBRT and<br />

proton therapy in most cases of early-stage lung cancer. Therefore, CIRT may<br />

be safer for patients with adverse conditions such as large tumors, central<br />

tumors, and poor pulmonary function. Multi-institutional retrospective study<br />

of CIRT for stage I NSCLC was completed and will be presented at ASTRO 2016<br />

by the Japan Carbon-ion Radiation <strong>Oncology</strong> Study Group (J-CROS). Carbonion<br />

therapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer There was only one<br />

report about CIRT for locally advanced NSCLC. A prospective nonrandomized<br />

phase I/II study of CIRT in a favorable subset of locally advanced NSCLC<br />

was reported from NIRS (9). They showed that short-course carbon-ion<br />

monotherapy (72GyE/16Fr) was associated with manageable toxicity and<br />

encouraging local control rates. Among them, cT3-4N0M0 patients were good<br />

candidates for CIRT. There is otherwise a lack of evidence currently for CIRT<br />

for locally advanced NSCLC, and more study is needed. Moreover, concurrent<br />

systemic therapy is essential to improve survival for locally advanced NSCLC.<br />

Future directions We organized a multi-institutional study group of carbonion<br />

radiation oncology in Japan (J-CROS). This group is currently conducting<br />

trials on several tumor sites which are thought to be most attractive for<br />

CIRT, including NSCLC, head and neck disease, locally advanced unresectable<br />

pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, locally recurrent rectal cancer,<br />

and others. The outcomes of CIRT for stage I NSCLC at all Japanese carbon<br />

centers were pooled and retrospectively analyzed. Consequently, CIRT may be<br />

considered a low-risk and effective treatment option for patients with stage I<br />

NSCLC. J-CROS has now begun a confirmatory multi-institutional prospective<br />

study to confirm these results.References: 1. Kamada T, Tsujii H, Blakely EA,<br />

et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy in Japan: an assessment of 20 years of clinical<br />

experience. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: e93-100.<br />

2. Sawabata N, Miyaoka E, Asamura H, et al. Japanese lung cancer registry<br />

study of 11,663 surgical cases in 2004: demographic and prognosis changes<br />

over decade. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6: 1229-35.<br />

3. Miyamoto T, Yamamoto N, Nishimura H, et al. Carbon ionradiotherapy for<br />

stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2003; 66: 127-140.<br />

4. Miyamoto T, Baba M, Yamamoto N, et al. Curative treatment of Stage I<br />

non-small-cell lung cancer with carbon ion beams using a hypofractionated<br />

regimen. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 750-758.<br />

5. Miyamoto T, Baba M, Sugane T, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I<br />

non-small cell lung cancer using a regimen of four fractions during 1 week. J<br />

Thorac Oncol 2007; 10: 916-926.<br />

6. Sugane T, Baba M, Imai R, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy for elderly patients<br />

80 years and older with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2009;<br />

64: 45-50.<br />

7. Takahashi W, Nakajima M, Yamamoto N, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy in a<br />

hypofractionation regimen for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Radiat Res<br />

2014; 55(suppl 1): i26–i27.<br />

8. Karube M, Yamamoto N, Nakajima M, et al. Single-fraction carbon-ion<br />

radiation therapy for patients 80 years of age and older with stage I non-small<br />

cell lung cancer. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95: 542-548.<br />

9. Takahashi W, Nakajima M, Yamamoto N, and et al. A prospective<br />

nonrandomized phase I/II study of carbon ion radiotherapy in a favorable<br />

subset of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer 2015;<br />

121: 1321-7.<br />

Ref.<br />

Pts.<br />

3) 81 72<br />

Mean T1:<br />

age T2<br />

41:<br />

41<br />

4) 50 74.1<br />

30:<br />

21<br />

5) 79 74.8<br />

42:<br />

37<br />

6) 28 82<br />

12:<br />

17<br />

7) 151 73.9 91:<br />

60<br />

8) 70 83<br />

39:<br />

31<br />

Total dose<br />

(GyRBE)<br />

/ fractions<br />

59.4-<br />

95.4/<br />

9-18<br />

5-yr<br />

F/U<br />

local<br />

(months)<br />

control<br />

5-yr<br />

causespecific<br />

survival<br />

52.6 76% 60% 42%<br />

5-yr Toxicity<br />

overall<br />

survival grade 3 <<br />

lung<br />

3.7%<br />

72/ 9 59.2 94.7% 75.7% 50.0% skin<br />

2%<br />

52.8-<br />

60/ 4<br />

52.8-72/<br />

4-9<br />

38.6 90% 68% 45% 0%<br />

NA 95.8% NA 30.7% 0%<br />

36-50/ 1 45.6 79.2% NA 55.1% 0%<br />

28-50/ 1 42.7 85.8% 64.9% 39.7% 0%<br />

Keywords: carbon-ion therapy, non-small cell lung cancer, J-CROS<br />

Copyright © 2016 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer<br />

S41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!