02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

(EGFR-TKI) drastically prolonged progression free survival (PFS) of patients<br />

with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR<br />

mutations. However, most cases show tumor regrowth after approximately<br />

only ten months treatment, and the prognosis is still poor. Then it is necessary<br />

to make new strategy of treatment for NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation,<br />

and we designed phase I/II study of Erlotinib, Carboplatin, Pemetrexed<br />

and Bevacizumab in chemotherapy-naïve patients with EGFR mutation<br />

positive advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: In the phase I part,<br />

eligible patients were administrated orally Erlotinib daily, and Pemetrexed,<br />

Carboplatin and Bevacizumab intravenously every three weeks for four<br />

cycles with maintenance of Pemetrexed and Bevacizumab until PD. The dose<br />

level of Erlotinib were 100mg in level 1 and 150mg in level 2. And the dose of<br />

pemetrexed, carboplatin and bevacizmab were fixed as 500mg per m 2 , AUC6<br />

and 15mg per kg. The dose limiting toxicities are Grade (Gr) 3-4 neutropenia<br />

with fever or infection, Gr 4 leukopenia lasting for 7 days or longer, Gr 4<br />

thrombocytopenia, Gr 3-4 uncontrollable non-hematological toxicity and<br />

delayed administration of the subsequent course by more than 2 weeks due<br />

to adverse events. Results: Six patients were enrolled in Phase I part (level<br />

1-three, level 2-three). The median age was 71.5 y.o. (Range, 46-76 y.o). Male<br />

was one and female were five. Histology of all patients was adenocarcinoma,<br />

and Ex19del was four and Ex21 L858R was two. A Gr3 of neutropenia without<br />

fever was observed in level 1, and a Gr3 of neutropenia without fever, three<br />

Gr3 thrombocytopenia and a stomatitis were observed in level 2(Table1). No<br />

DLT events were observed in Phase I. Table1<br />

Grade 1 2 3<br />

ANC 1 1<br />

PLT 2<br />

Anemia 2<br />

Whereas the T790M mutation confers prolonged survival and sensitivity<br />

to 3rd generation TKIs, there is no data on outcome and treatment of<br />

MET-driven resistant EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Methods: Molecular<br />

and clinico-pathological data from patients with advanced EGFR-mutated<br />

NSCLC and MET overexpression or amplification on a post-progression<br />

(PP) sample obtained after treatment with EGFR TKI were retrospectively<br />

reviewed in 15 nationwide centers. MET overexpression was defined by MET<br />

immunochemistry (IHC) score 3+ and MET amplification was assessed by FISH<br />

and defined by MET/CEP7 ratio >2 or MET copy number >6 or MET clusters.<br />

Results: 43 patients were included (24 del19, 16 L858R and 3 rare EGFR<br />

mutations). The median time between EGFR TKI initiation and PP biopsy was<br />

13.8 months [2.1-61.3]. On PP biopsy, 20 tumors tested for FISH (53%) had<br />

MET amplification and all out of 37 samples tested for IHC were scored 3+. No<br />

epithelial to mesenchymal transformation was observed. A T790M mutation<br />

was found in 12/42 (29%) PP biopsies. 5 patients had both MET amplification<br />

and T790M mutation. The median overall survival (OS), and the median PP<br />

OS were 36.2 months [IC95% 27.3-45.6] and 18.5 months [IC95% 10.6-26.5],<br />

respectively. 16 patients received a MET TKI. Objective response was reported<br />

in 1 out of 12 evaluable patients treated with a MET TKI as single agent and in 1<br />

of 2 patients treated with a combination of MET and EGFR TKIs. No significant<br />

difference was found according to the MET FISH status for OS and PP OS. 3<br />

out of 9 evaluable T790M-positive patients had an objective response upon<br />

3rd generation EGFR TKI. T790M-positive patients had a better OS (median<br />

84.7 vs. 32.2 months, p=0.016) and PP OS (median 36.9 vs. 11 months, p=0.0141)<br />

than T790M-negative patients. Conclusion: Even when associated with METdriven<br />

resistance to EGFR TKIs, the T790M mutation may be associated with<br />

relative sensitivity to 3rd generation EGFR TKIs and prolonged survival. MET<br />

TKIs alone yield low ORR, which emphasizes the need for further evaluation of<br />

combinations of EGFR and MET TKIs.<br />

Keywords: MET amplification, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, TKI<br />

resistance<br />

Stomatitis 1 1<br />

Nausea 1 2<br />

Appetite loss 1 2<br />

Rash 1<br />

Transaminase 1<br />

T.Bil 1<br />

Fatigue 1<br />

Bleeding 1<br />

Diarrhea 1<br />

Conclusion: The recommend dose of Erlotinb is 150mg daily.<br />

Keywords: EGFR, Erlotinib, bevacizumab, pemetrexed<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02B: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

EGFR CLINICAL –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02B-051 OUTCOME OF ADVANCED EGFR-MUTATED NSCLC<br />

PATIENTS WITH MET-DRIVEN ACQUIRED RESISTANCE TO EGFR TKI.<br />

RESULTS OF THE METEORE STUDY<br />

Simon Baldacci 1 , Julien Mazieres 2 , Pascale Tomasini 3 , Nicolas Girard 4 , Florian<br />

Guisier 5 , Clarisse Audigier Valette 6 , Isabelle Monnet 7 , Marie Wislez 8 , Maurice<br />

Pérol 9 , Pascal Dô 10 , Eric Dansin 11 , Charlotte Leduc 12 , Etienne Giroux Leprieur 13 ,<br />

Denis Moro-Sibilot 14 , Zoulika Kherrouche 15 , Julien Labreuche 16 , Alexis Cortot 1<br />

1 Service de Pneumologi Et Oncologie Thoracique, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille/France,<br />

2 Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse/France, 3 Department of Multidisciplinary<br />

<strong>Oncology</strong> and Therapeutic Innovations, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille,<br />

Marseilles/France, 4 Respiratory Medicine, <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong>, Louis Pradel<br />

Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon/France, 5 Rouen University Hospital, Rouen/<br />

France, 6 Centre Hospitalier Sainte Musse, Toulon/France, 7 Centre Hospitalier<br />

Intercommunal de Creteil, Creteil/France, 8 Service de Pneumologie, Aphp Hôpital<br />

Tenon, Paris/France, 9 Groupe Thoracique Et Orl, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon/France,<br />

10 Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer François Baclesse, Caen/France,<br />

11 Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille/France, 12 CHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg/France, 13 Aphp<br />

– Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt/France, 14 Pôle Thorax Et Vaisseaux,<br />

Unité D’Oncologie Thoracique, Service de Pneumologie, Grenoble/France, 15 Cnrs<br />

Umr 8161, Institut de Biologie de Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Université de Lille,<br />

Lille/France, 16 Ea 2694 Université de Lille, Lille/France<br />

POSTER SESSION 3 – P3.02B: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

EGFR CLINICAL –<br />

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016<br />

P3.02B-052 AFATINIB WITH OR WITHOUT CETUXIMAB FOR FIRST-<br />

LINE TREATMENT OF EGFR-MUTANT NSCLC: INTERIM SAFETY<br />

RESULTS OF SWOG S1403<br />

Sarah Goldberg 1 , James Moon 2 , Rogerio Lilenbaum 1 , Katerina Politi 1 , Mary<br />

Ann Melnick 1 , Thomas Stinchcombe 3 , Leora Horn 4 , Everett Chen 5 , Jieling<br />

Miao 2 , Mary Redman 2 , Karen Kelly 6 , David R. Gandara 7<br />

1 Yale School of Medicine, New Haven/CT/United States of America, 2 Swog<br />

Statistical Center, Seattle/WA/United States of America, 3 Duke University,<br />

Durham/NC/United States of America, 4 Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville/<br />

TN/United States of America, 5 Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Bellflower/CA/<br />

United States of America, 6 Hematology <strong>Oncology</strong>, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer<br />

Center, Sacramento/CA/United States of America, 7 Division of Hem-<strong>Oncology</strong>, UC<br />

Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento/CA/United States of America<br />

Background: Afatinib is used as first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant non-small<br />

cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however resistance invariably develops. To attempt<br />

to delay resistance and improve survival, we are conducting a randomized<br />

Phase II/III trial of afatinib plus cetuximab versus afatinib alone in treatmentnaïve<br />

patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC (NCT02438722). Methods:<br />

Previously untreated patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R point<br />

mutation are randomized to afatinib 40mg PO daily plus cetuximab 500mg/<br />

m2 IV every 2 weeks (afat/cetux) or afatinib 40mg PO daily (afat). Dose<br />

reductions are performed for grade 3-4 or intolerable or medically concerning<br />

grade 2 adverse events (AEs) per CTCAE v4.0. The Phase II primary endpoint is<br />

progression-free survival and the Phase III primary endpoint is overall survival.<br />

Here we review the safety data after enrollment of the first 53 patients.<br />

Results: 53 patients were registered as of June 30, 2016, and safety has been<br />

assessed in 47 (23 treated with afat/cetux and 24 with afat, see Table). Grade<br />

1-2 rash occurred in 71% of patients receiving afat/cetux and 63% of patients<br />

on afat. Grade 3 rash was noted in 22% of patients on afat/cetux. Fatigue was<br />

more common in the combination arm; all occurrences were grade 1-2. Grade<br />

1-2 diarrhea and other gastrointestinal AEs were comparable between the<br />

two arms. There were similar numbers of dose reductions for AEs on each arm.<br />

Three patients discontinued treatment due to AEs: 2 on the afat/cetux arm<br />

due to hyperglycemia and accumulated side effects and 1 on the afat arm due<br />

to weight loss and diarrhea.<br />

Background: Several mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs have<br />

been described including the T790M mutation and MET amplification.<br />

S640 <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!