02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

Department of <strong>Thoracic</strong> and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University<br />

Bundang Hospital, Seongnam/Korea, Republic of<br />

Background: Post-recurrence survival (PRS) after curative resection has<br />

been considered a multifactorial process dependent on clinicopathological,<br />

biological, and treatment modality in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The<br />

aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors for PRS in patients<br />

with completely resected stage III-N2 NSCLC. Methods: Two hundred fortyfive<br />

patients who had complete resection for pathologic stage III-N2 NSCLC<br />

between 2003 and 2014 were enrolled. First, a number of clinicopathological<br />

factors were evaluated to find prognostic factors for recurrence by Cox<br />

proportional hazards models. Second, the following additional data were<br />

evaluated: presence of recurrent symptom, recurrence patterns, treatment<br />

modality, use of targeted agents, and recurrence-free interval. The prognostic<br />

effects of these factors were analyzed for PRS. Results: One hundred twentyfour<br />

patients experienced recurrence during a median follow-up period of<br />

36.3 months. Univariate analysis showed that vascular invasion, lymphatic<br />

invasion, tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes (LNs), and multistation<br />

N2 were poor prognostic factors for recurrence. Lymphatic invasion, tumor<br />

size, and number of positive LNs were even worse independent prognostic<br />

factors for recurrence by multivariate analysis. Of 124 recurred patients, 21<br />

patients (17%) were symptomatic at the time of initial recurrence, and the<br />

remaining 103 patients (83%) were asymptomatic. In these asymptomatic<br />

patients, recurrence was detected by tumor markers in 3, computed<br />

tomography (CT) in 80, or positron emission tomography-CT (PET/CT) in 20<br />

patients. The mean recurrence-free interval was 14.0 months (≤ 12 months in<br />

72, > 12 months in 52 patients). The patterns of recurrence were presented as<br />

loco-regional recurrence in 37 (30%), distant metastasis in 33 patients (27%),<br />

and both in 54 patients (43%). The types of initial treatment included surgery<br />

in 15 (12%), chemotherapy in 68 (55%), radiotherapy in 19 (15%), and chemoradiation<br />

in 16 patients (13%). The median duration of PRS was 30.5 (1-109)<br />

months and the 2-year and 5-year of PRS were 54% and 23%, respectively.<br />

Univariate analysis identified no symptom of recurrence, only LN metastasis<br />

without distant organ metastasis, treatment modality, and a longer<br />

recurrence-free interval as good prognostic factors, while no symptom and a<br />

longer recurrence-free interval were independent prognostic factors for PRS<br />

in a multivariate analysis. Conclusion: No symptom at the time of recurrence<br />

and a longer recurrence-free interval were significant predictors of better PRS<br />

in patients that have underwent complete resection of stage III-N2 NSCLC.<br />

Keywords: stage III-N2, Post-recurrence survival, non-small cell lung cancer<br />

POSTER SESSION 1 - P1.08: SURGERY<br />

SURGERY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED AND ADVANCED NSCLC –<br />

MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016<br />

P1.08-067 THE FEASIBILITY OF LUNG SECOND SURGERY FOR 2ND<br />

PRIMARY LUNG CANCER<br />

Kazunori Hata, Kenji Suzuki, Takeshi Matsunaga, Kazuya Takamochi, Shiaki<br />

Oh<br />

Department of General <strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine,<br />

Tokyo/Japan<br />

Background: 2 nd primary lung cancer often has been encountered because of<br />

improvement of treatment outcome for lung cancer. If close follow up was<br />

performed after first surgery, 2 nd primary lung cancer often was detected in<br />

early stage. And local therapy was indicated for this 2 nd primary lung cancer.<br />

However, there is no rule whether stereotactic radiation therapy or surgery<br />

should be chosen. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of<br />

second surgery. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively 123 consecutive<br />

patients with past history of lung resection who underwent second surgery<br />

for 2 nd primary lung cancer between 2008 and 2015 at our institution. i)<br />

These 123 cases were divided into 2 groups, contralateral and ipsilateral<br />

surgery groups. The difference between two groups of surgical difficulties<br />

(operation time and blood loss) and feasibility (post-operative complication<br />

and length of hospital stay) were evaluated by using Mann-Whitney U-test<br />

and Fisher’s exact test. ii) 82 cases who underwent contralateral surgery<br />

was picked up and divided into 3 groups, both lobectomy, lobectomy<br />

and limited surgery and both limited surgery. The difference between 3<br />

groups of surgical difficulties and feasibility were evaluated by using same<br />

methods. iii) Furthermore, 41 cases who underwent ipsilateral surgery<br />

divided into 4 groups by procedure: completion pneumonectomy, lobectomy,<br />

segmentectomy and wedge resection. The difference between 4 groups of<br />

surgical difficulties and feasibility were evaluated by using same methods.<br />

Results: i) Not only operation time (161min vs 123min, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!