02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

knockdown of miR-1275 affected proteins relating to cell proliferation and<br />

apoptosis. Bioinformatics showed SPOCK1 might be one of the targets of<br />

miRNA-1275. Conclusion: Our results contribute to understand molecular<br />

mechanisms of T790M-mediated EGFR-TKI resistance, but also provide a new<br />

therapeutic strategy for patients in advanced NSCLC to aid expansion of the<br />

effectiveness of TKI treatment through radiotherapy.<br />

Keywords: EGFR-TKI, Acquried resistance, radiation, T790M<br />

POSTER SESSION 2 – P2.05: RADIOTHERAPY<br />

Clinical Outcome –<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016<br />

P2.05-006 RADIOTHERAPY AS DEFINITIVE TREATMENT IN<br />

PATIENTS AGED 70 YEARS AND OLDER WITH NON-SMALL CELL<br />

LUNG CANCER<br />

Sureyya Sarihan 1 , Türkkan Evrensel 2 , Deniz Sigirli 3<br />

1 Radiation <strong>Oncology</strong>, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa/Turkey,<br />

2 Medical <strong>Oncology</strong>, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa/Turkey,<br />

3 Biostatistics, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa/Turkey<br />

Background: The factors affecting survival were evaluated in patients aged<br />

≥ 70 years with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive<br />

radiotherapy (RT). Methods: Between January 1996 and April 2012, 52 patients<br />

were treated. The median age was 73 (range: 70-80), 73% and 75% of patients<br />

with stage III according to AJCC 2002 and 2010, respectively. Radiotherapy<br />

was performed median 6160 cGy (range: 3600-6660) and chemotherapy (CHE)<br />

were given 75% of the patients as neoadjuvant, concurrent or adjuvant.<br />

Statistical analysis were calculated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression<br />

methods. Results: Median follow-up was 12.5 months (range: 2.5-103). Median<br />

overall (OS), disease-free (DFS) and locoregional-progression-free (LRPFS)<br />

survival were 22 (95% CI 12-31), 18.5 (95% CI 7-29) and 25 months (95% CI 15-<br />

34), respectively. Two-year OS, DFS and LRPFS rates were 50%, 47% and 52%,<br />

respectively. Acute ≥ Grade 3 esophagitis and neutropenia were seen 6% and<br />

10% of patients. Whereas the mortality associated with CHE were seen of 5<br />

(10%) patients, RT-related death was not observed. In univariate analysis;<br />

AJCC 2002 stage I-II (72.5 vs 20 months, p = 0.05), RT dose ≥ 60 Gy (27.5 vs 12.5<br />

months, p = 0.01), RT duration >49 days (31 vs 11 months, p 49 days (26.5 vs 10.5<br />

months, p 49 days were found a positive impact on OS (HR: 3.235, 95% CI: 1:25<br />

to 8:32 p = 0.01). Conclusion: Definitive and pallliative RT plays an important<br />

role in elderly lung cancer patients have multiple co-morbidities with limited<br />

treatment options. In our study, elderly patients with NCSLC can be given ≥ 60<br />

Gy without complications and was seen positively impact on survival.<br />

Keywords: survival, non-small cell lung cancer, Elderly patients, Radiotherapy<br />

POSTER SESSION 2 – P2.05: RADIOTHERAPY<br />

CLINICAL OUTCOME –<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016<br />

P2.05-007 OUTCOMES AFTER STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHRAPY/<br />

PROTON BEAM THERAPY OR WEDGE RESECTION FOR STAGE I NON-<br />

SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER<br />

Yasuhisa Ohde 1 , Hideyuki Harada 2 , Shoko Hayashi 1 , Kiyomichi Mizuno 3 ,<br />

Yoshiyuki Yasuura 1 , Reiko Shimizu 1 , Hiroyuki Kayata 1 , Hideaki Kojima 1 , Shoji<br />

Takahashi 1 , Mitsuhiro Isaka 1 , Toshiaki Takahashi 4 , Shigeyuki Murayama 2 ,<br />

Tetsuo Nishimura 2 , Keita Mori 5<br />

1 <strong>Thoracic</strong> Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka/Japan, 2 Radiation and Proton<br />

Beam Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka/Japan, 3 Shizuoka Cancer<br />

Center, Shizuoka/Japan, 4 <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong>, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka/<br />

Japan, 5 Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka/Japan<br />

Background: Recently, excellent results of stereotactic body radiotherapy<br />

(SBRT), proton beam therapy (PBT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer<br />

(NSCLC) have been reported, however any phase III trial comparing SBRT and<br />

surgery have not been completed yet. The aim of this study is to compare<br />

outcomes between SBRT, PBT and wedge resection (WR) for patients with<br />

peripheral stage I NSCLC who intolerable for anatomical resection, and<br />

analyze prognostic factors in this population. Methods: We retrospectively<br />

compared overall survival (OS), local recurrence rate (LRR), relapse-free<br />

survival (RFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) between WR (n=172) and SBRT<br />

/ PBT (n=188) for pathologically proven clinical stage I NSCLC in our institute<br />

from 2002 to 2015. Patients underwent WR were all high risk patients who<br />

intolerable for anatomical resection and achieved complete resection without<br />

any adjuvant therapy. Of radiation group (RT: SBRT+PBT), 56% was medically<br />

inoperable, with 44% refusing surgery. SBRT; 60 Gy in 8 fractions, PBT; 60-80<br />

GyE in 10-20 fractions was prescribed. Propensity score matching was used to<br />

adjust the confounding effects in estimating treatment hazard ratios. 59 WR<br />

patients and 59 radiotherapy (RT) patients (SBRT 27, PBT 32) were matched<br />

blinded to outcome (1:1 ratio). There are 70 men and 48 women, median age<br />

was 81, and median follow-up period was 39 months. Results: 3, 5 - year overall<br />

survival (OS) of WR and RT was 84.5%, 70.8% vs 89.7%, 59.6% (p=0.802),<br />

respectively. 3-year LRR, RFS, CSS were 94.7% vs 95.9% (p=0.751), 87.5% vs<br />

75.6% (p=0.151) and 91.2% vs 93.9% (p=0.875), respectively. Multivariate<br />

analysis of prognostic factors for OS demonstrated any factors including<br />

treatment modality were not significant. Conclusion: Our results suggest that<br />

the treatment outcome of SBRT / PBT was equivalent to that of WR, SBRT /<br />

PBT may be alternative treatment in stage I NSCLC high risk patients.<br />

Keywords: SBRT, Surgery, lung cancer<br />

POSTER SESSION 2 – P2.05: RADIOTHERAPY<br />

CLINICAL OUTCOME –<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016<br />

P2.05-008 CAN STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY (SBRT)<br />

BE AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR LUNG METASTASES FROM<br />

“RADIORESISTANT” HISTOLOGIES?<br />

Davide Franceschini, Fiorenza De Rose, Luca Cozzi, Tiziana Comito, Ciro<br />

Franzese, Pierina Navarria, Giuseppe D’Agostino, Marta Scorsetti<br />

Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano<br />

Milano/Italy<br />

Background: Metastasis from “radioresistant” histologies are commonly<br />

regarded as less responsive to SBRT. Almost no data are available in Literature<br />

to evaluate the impact of these histologies on the outcome of patients with<br />

lung metastases treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).<br />

Therefore, we conducted this analysis on patients with lung metastases from<br />

renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma and<br />

melanoma treated with SBRT in our Institution. Methods: Oligometastatic<br />

patients with lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular<br />

carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma and melanoma who received SBRT and<br />

with a discrete follow up time were included in this analysis. Kaplan Meyer<br />

analysis was used to calculate Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival,<br />

Local Control. Crude rates were used to calculate the response and distant<br />

failure rates. Toxicity was scored according to CTCAE v. 4.03 Results: Sixty<br />

patients were included in the study. Most common primary histologies were<br />

renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Most of patients had 1 or<br />

2 metastatic sites. Half patents did not receive any systemic therapy during<br />

their history before SBRT. Different RT doses and number of fractions were<br />

utilized according to site, number and volume of lung metastases, 48 Gy<br />

in 4 fractions was the most commonly prescribed schedule. The best local<br />

responses obtained were complete response in 13 patients (21.7%), partial<br />

response in 28 patients (46.7%) and stable disease in 14 patients (23.3%).<br />

Five patients (8.3%) had a local progression. With a median follow up of 24.3<br />

months (range 4.1-118.6 months), local control was 93.7% and 86.1% at 1 and 2<br />

years respectively. OS and PFS at 1 and 2 year were 89.5%, 64.6%, 87.7% and<br />

70.1%, respectively. None of the analyzed parameters showed a statistically<br />

significant impact on any outcome. Treatment was well tolerated. None but<br />

one patients experienced acute toxicity of any grade. During follow up in 10<br />

cases G1-2 toxicity (mostly pneumonia) were recorded. Conclusion: SBRT for<br />

lung metastases is an effective treatment for oligometastatic patients with<br />

lung metastases from “radioresistant” histologies. The treatment is safe and<br />

well tolerated and the outcomes are equivalent to the results obtainable with<br />

SBRT for lung metastases from more favourable histologies.<br />

Keywords: Stereotactic body radiation therapy, Oligometastases,<br />

Radioresistance, lung metastases<br />

POSTER SESSION 2 – P2.05: RADIOTHERAPY<br />

CLINICAL OUTCOME –<br />

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2016<br />

P2.05-009 THE OUTCOME AND ADVERSE EVENT OF<br />

CHEMORADIATION ± SURGERY FOR STAGE III NON-SMALL CELL<br />

LUNG CANCER<br />

Shigehiro Kudo 1 , Yoshihiro Saito 1 , Hiroki Ushijima 1 , Yu Okubo 1 , Tomoko<br />

Kazumoto 2 , Jun-Ichi Saito 3 , Hideaki Mizutani 4 , Yuki Yamane 4 , Junko Sudo 4 ,<br />

Futoshi Kurimoto 4 , Hiroshi Sakai 4 , Yuki Nakajima 5 , Hiroyasu Kinoshita 5 ,<br />

Hirohiko Akiyama 5<br />

S542 <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!