02.12.2016 Views

Journal Thoracic Oncology

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

WCLC2016-Abstract-Book_vF-WEB_revNov17-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017<br />

Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), a 30 item questionnaire yielding five<br />

functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status/QoL scale, and<br />

six single items. Analysis was stratified by patients’ line of therapy. Statistical<br />

significance was assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Patients’<br />

mean (SD) age was 65.2 (9.7), 68.8% were male and 89.0% had stage IV NSCLC.<br />

Over two-thirds (71%) of patients were receiving 1st line advanced therapy,<br />

whilst 29% were receiving later lines of therapy. Regarding histology, 74% of<br />

patients were non-squamous compared to 26% squamous. The mean EQ-5D-3L<br />

index for 2 nd line or later patients was significantly lower compared to patients<br />

on 1 st line treatment (0.57 vs 0.65; p=0.002). Three domains showed significant<br />

decreases: mobility, self-care and ability to perform usual activities. In terms of<br />

EORTC scores, patients on later lines of treatment experienced a lower overall<br />

global health status (QL2) compared to 1 st line patients (43.8 vs 50.7; p1. The majority of cases in young group were stage<br />

IIIB (77.3.%). Pathology was squamous (40.9%), adenocarcinoma (22.7%),<br />

undifferentiated (22.7%) and adenosquamous carcinoma in 4.5% of our cases.<br />

Median OS and PFS was 18 and 4 months respectively. Significant difference<br />

in OS and PFS was observed among responder versus non responders in<br />

multivariate analysis (Figure) Conclusion: Good response to chemotherapy is<br />

the best way to prolong survival among young NSCLC cases irrespective of PS,<br />

gender, stage or pathology.<br />

P1.06-034 OUTCOMES AFTER PULMONARY METASTASECTOMY FOR<br />

METASTATIC CANCER<br />

Prakash Balakrishnan 1 , Yousr Al-Sheibani 2 , Sean Galvin 2 , Barry Mahon 2 , John<br />

Riordan 2 , James Mcgiven 2<br />

1 Cardiothoracic Department, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington/New<br />

Zealand, 2 Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wellington Hospital, Wellington/New Zealand<br />

Background: In most malignant diseases, the ability to constantly<br />

metastasize remains a truly challenging obstacle in cancer patients.<br />

Historically in the past, any local surgical treatment in patients with systemic<br />

malignant disease is considered without any prognostic benefit, this has<br />

since evolved with many studies confering huge success rates with excellent<br />

prognostic benefits. We hereby report our experience over the last 10 years at<br />

Wellington Regional Hospital, Cardiothoracic unit. Methods: A retrospective<br />

study was undertaken in series of patients with colorectal, melanoma, breast,<br />

sarcoma & renal metastatic disease undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy,<br />

from year 2000 to 2010. These data was identified & stratified into groups<br />

using hospital patient database & ORSOS theatre database with the aid<br />

of Excel spreadsheet. Results: All these patients were operated on either<br />

– unilateral versus bilateral, VATS or thoracotomies with or without lymph<br />

node dssection as well as repeat surgeries. The role of metastatectomy in<br />

their treatment options & the prognostic factors with impact on survival<br />

discussed. Conclusion: In carefully selected surgical patients, pulmonary<br />

metastasectomy for metastatic diseases confers continual prognostic &<br />

survival advantage for these patients.<br />

Keywords: pulmonary metastasectomy, Metastatic Disease, outcomes<br />

POSTER SESSION 1 - P1.06: ADVANCED NSCLC & CHEMOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY/<br />

IMMUNOTHERAPY<br />

ADVANCED GENERAL –<br />

MONDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2016<br />

P1.06-035 FREQUENCY AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF<br />

EGFR-MUTATIONS AND EML4-ALK-TRANSLOCATIONS IN<br />

OCTAGENARIANS WITH NSCLC<br />

Amanda Tufman 1 , Simone Reu 2 , Sandra Hasmann 3 , Diego Kauffmann-<br />

Guerrero 1 , Katrin Milger 1 , Zulfiya Syunyaeva 1 , Kathrin Kahnert 1 , Rudolf Huber 1<br />

1 Respirology and <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong>, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Member<br />

of the German Center for Lung Research Dzl, Ludwig Maximilian University of<br />

Munich, Munich/Germany, 2 Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University,<br />

Munich/Germany, 3 Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich/Germany<br />

Background: Novel therapies targeting genetic alterations have improved<br />

response rates and overall survival for some patients with NSCLC;<br />

however, only a minority of caucasian patients with lung cancer benefit<br />

from these treatments. Testing for EGFR mutation and ALK translocation<br />

is recommended for all patients with advanced adenocarcinoma, but<br />

the highest occurance of these driver mutations has been described in<br />

S354 <strong>Journal</strong> of <strong>Thoracic</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong> • Volume 12 Issue S1 January 2017

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!