Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7. Conclusion<br />
for youth mental health is complex and fragmented. While individual <strong>headspace</strong> centres can and do<br />
mitigate some of these issues locally, there are significant structural barriers <strong>to</strong> providing a holistic<br />
and continuous service <strong>to</strong> vulnerable <strong>young</strong> people.<br />
The evaluation identified a number of ways that the service delivery model could be enhanced <strong>to</strong><br />
better meet the needs of <strong>young</strong> people and their parents. Many parents and carers would like <strong>to</strong> be<br />
more engaged with their <strong>young</strong> person’s treatment and wanted more help <strong>to</strong> learn how <strong>to</strong> effectively<br />
support their <strong>young</strong> person. Further, evaluation data indicates that there is a need for <strong>headspace</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
provide family-based therapy. Many staff at centres acknowledged this need and would like <strong>to</strong> be<br />
better able <strong>to</strong> support families as a unit.<br />
Another way that the service delivery model could be enhanced <strong>to</strong> better meet the needs of <strong>young</strong><br />
people is <strong>to</strong> increase the capacity of centres <strong>to</strong> provide outreach services <strong>to</strong> engage <strong>young</strong> people<br />
who are reluctant <strong>to</strong> engage in centre based care. While e<strong>headspace</strong> and engagement with schools<br />
have attempted <strong>to</strong> address these issues, there are still large groups of <strong>young</strong> people not accessing<br />
<strong>headspace</strong>.<br />
The evaluation highlights some workforce challenges, particularly the need for more GPs and<br />
psychiatrists in <strong>headspace</strong> centres or attached <strong>to</strong> them. Although further evidence is required,<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> should consider and address the reasons why many GPs are not willing <strong>to</strong> refer <strong>young</strong><br />
people <strong>to</strong> <strong>headspace</strong>. A strategy <strong>to</strong> actively engage GPs may be required <strong>to</strong> boost awareness and<br />
develop trust. The data collected from GPs suggests that alternative forms of collaboration between<br />
centres and GPs should be considered.<br />
Online and telephone treatment methods may be of assistance <strong>to</strong> help not only increase scale, but <strong>to</strong><br />
support <strong>young</strong> people with low needs as well as <strong>young</strong> people unable <strong>to</strong> leave their homes or travel<br />
<strong>to</strong> <strong>headspace</strong> centres.<br />
The economic evaluation<br />
The economic analysis indicates that the average cost of a <strong>headspace</strong> occasion of service is $339<br />
(2013/14 dollars) 37 . Considerable variation in average costs per occasion of service at the centre<br />
level exists and can range from $136 <strong>to</strong> above $1,000, taking in<strong>to</strong> account the <strong>headspace</strong> grant only.<br />
Substantial surpluses also exist in terms of the <strong>headspace</strong> grant within the 2013/14 financial year. It is<br />
recognised that legitimate impediments may reduce the ability of some centres <strong>to</strong> realise operational<br />
efficiencies, particularly in certain areas throughout Australia. However, it is recommended that<br />
centre level operational efficiencies are examined in order <strong>to</strong> make better use of finite resources. This<br />
could involve a number of measures, including:<br />
• review of funding grant allocation relative <strong>to</strong> his<strong>to</strong>rical and predicted need at the local area<br />
level<br />
• targeted assistance <strong>to</strong> particular centres <strong>to</strong> ensure operational efficiencies are optimised<br />
• performance indica<strong>to</strong>rs and targets linked <strong>to</strong> grant funding.<br />
Each of these initiatives would need <strong>to</strong> be carefully considered and implemented <strong>to</strong> ensure that<br />
unintended consequences for the <strong>headspace</strong> program did not materialise and that <strong>headspace</strong><br />
can continue <strong>to</strong> reach its objectives in improving the social, emotional and mental health of <strong>young</strong><br />
Australians. In terms of the government investment, the mental health of <strong>headspace</strong> clients improves<br />
moderately relative <strong>to</strong> other matched control groups. It should also be noted that <strong>headspace</strong> provides<br />
a number of benefits such as community engagement and awareness which are difficult <strong>to</strong> cost but<br />
which have raised the profile of youth mental health in Australia.<br />
37<br />
There is no similar program with which <strong>to</strong> directly compare and benchmark <strong>headspace</strong> program costs, however, this<br />
occasion of service cost compares closely <strong>to</strong> ambula<strong>to</strong>ry services which nationally averaged $303 per treatment day<br />
in the 2012-13 financial year (excluding Vic<strong>to</strong>ria). Ambula<strong>to</strong>ry care services (a form of community based mental health<br />
services) are provided by outpatient clinics (hospital or clinic based), mobile assessment and treatment teams, day<br />
programs and other services dedicated <strong>to</strong> assessment, treatment, rehabilitation and mental health care (SCRGSP,<br />
2015).<br />
Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />
114