Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7. Conclusion<br />
Overall the evaluation found a significant need for early intervention for <strong>young</strong> people with mental<br />
health, substance misuse, social/emotional and sexual/physical health problems. <strong>headspace</strong> is<br />
<strong>making</strong> some headway <strong>to</strong> address the service need and has had some success, especially in mental<br />
health. The cost of <strong>headspace</strong> treatment appears comparable <strong>to</strong> community mental health care.<br />
Further, if <strong>headspace</strong> did not exist, it is likely that large numbers of <strong>young</strong> people would not access<br />
services or would access them at a much later stage in the development of their disorders, potentially<br />
incurring significant costs <strong>to</strong> the government as well as difficulties for the <strong>young</strong> people and their<br />
families. Nevertheless, the evaluation has identified a number of ways in which <strong>headspace</strong> could<br />
improve its service delivery model and its access and engagement processes <strong>to</strong> better serve <strong>young</strong><br />
Australians.<br />
Implications for future research<br />
The evaluation identified a number of additional studies that, if undertaken, would make a valuable<br />
contribution <strong>to</strong> a better understanding of <strong>headspace</strong> and youth mental health care in Australia.<br />
A significant proportion of <strong>headspace</strong> clients receive only one or two occasions of service. The<br />
evaluation is unable <strong>to</strong> explain this high rate of single service use as administrative data does not<br />
explain why they disengaged, and <strong>young</strong> people who had left the service early were not interviewed.<br />
It is suggested that a longitudinal study be undertaken that moni<strong>to</strong>rs the service use of early leavers.<br />
As the evalua<strong>to</strong>rs were only working with one year’s data, we were unable <strong>to</strong> see if these people<br />
return after a period of time. Further, interviewing single service users would provide valuable<br />
information on the needs and motivations of <strong>young</strong> people who do seek help but disengage early<br />
from support services.<br />
Also, the logic behind <strong>headspace</strong> is that as an early intervention service, it will minimise the impact<br />
of mental illness over the lifetime of clients. Given the data limitations, the evaluation was unable <strong>to</strong><br />
establish if this is the case. It is suggested that further work be done in this area as more long-term<br />
data collected via the hCSA becomes accessible <strong>to</strong> researchers. To confirm the efficacy of early<br />
intervention in youth mental health, research will require access <strong>to</strong> other datasets such as MBS and<br />
hospital admission data.<br />
Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />
115