Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?

Appendix B
• Used the simulation model to determine whether full National Coverage of centres is a costeffective
proposition under the current allocation model. Our analysis suggests expanding
beyond a hypothetical Round 10 (for 32 new centres) would result in inefficient allocation of
resources
• Examined the strengths and weaknesses of the method and assumptions underpinning the
current model of centre allocation used by the Department
• Proposed alternative models of centre allocation and headspace service expansion, which
address specific weaknesses in the current model, for consideration by the Department
• Identified the additional scoping and data requirements to provide a more detailed
examination of these alternative approaches to expansion of the headspace model, and
• Highlighted the need for consideration of increased flexibility in headspace funding allocation
at the centre level and investigation of alternative methods of expansion and modes of
service delivery with the aim of balancing costs against improvements in access for young
people.
Social Policy Research Centre 2015
headspace Evaluation Final Report
167