Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?

Recommendations

Info

State (youth population) a headspace Round Additional youth captured Percentage of state youth population Queensland (n = 820,217) headspace Hervey Bay 2 8,177 1.00 headspace Southport 2 11,906 1.45 headspace Townsville 2 38,284 4.67 headspace Warwick 2 6,247 0.76 headspace Cairns 3 17,799 2.17 headspace Inala 3 56,179 6.85 headspace Nundah 3 34,406 4.19 headspace Ipswich 2 4 0 0.00 headspace Mackay 4 21,488 2.62 headspace Maroochydore 4 8,850 1.08 headspace Brisbane City 5 48,680 5.94 headspace Mt Isa 5 6,634 0.81 headspace Redcliffe 5 38,949 4.75 headspace Rockhampton 5 21,480 2.62 headspace Indooroopilly 6 38,489 4.69 headspace Toowoomba 6 27,983 3.41 headspace Woolloongabba 6 65,948 8.04 headspace Caboolture 2 7 0 0.00 headspace Capalaba 7 38,198 4.66 headspace Gladstone 7 13,133 1.60 headspace Bundaberg 8 14,197 1.73 Total Queensland 517,027 63.04 South Australia (n = 288,762) headspace Edinburgh North 1 76,106 26.36 headspace Edinburgh North 1 1 0 0.00 headspace Edinburgh North 1 1 0 0.00 headspace Edinburgh North 1 1 0 0.00 headspace Edinburgh North 1 1 0 0.00 headspace Berri 2 11,173 3.87 headspace Murray Bridge 2 2 0 0.00 headspace Noarlunga 3 61,402 21.26 headspace Port Augusta 4 5,235 1.81 headspace Woodville 5 38,229 13.24 headspace Norwood 6 53,165 18.41 headspace Limestone Coast 7 10,662 3.69 Total South Australia 255,972 88.64 Appendix G Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report 212
State (youth population) a headspace Round Additional youth captured Percentage of state youth population Western Australia (n = 428,209) headspace Albany 1 9,263 2.16 Fremantle headspace 2 68,604 16.02 headspace Broome 2 6,881 1.61 headspace Osborne Park 3 94,502 22.07 headspace Bunbury 4 17,547 4.10 headspace Midland 4 42,011 9.81 headspace Joondalup 2 5 0 0.00 headspace Rockingham 2 5 0 0.00 headspace Armadale 6 90,391 21.11 headspace Kalgoorlie 6 8,668 2.02 headspace Geraldton 7 9,749 2.28 Total Western Australia 347,616 81.18 Tasmania (n = 87,341) headspace Launceston 2 15,840 18.14 headspace Launceston 1 4 7,200 8.24 headspace Hobart 3 39,191 44.87 Total Tasmania 62,231 71.25 Northern Territory (n = 44,441) headspace Darwin 1 24,652 55.47 Australian Capital Territory (n = 73,462) headspace Alice Springs 2 7,639 17.19 Total Northern Territory 32,291 72.66 headspace Canberra 2 73,462 100.00 Total Australian Capital Territory 73,462 100.00 Australia (n = 3,982,368) 3,204,296 80.46 a population is as at the 2011 Census of Population and Housing. Appendix G Social Policy Research Centre 2015 headspace Evaluation Final Report 213
Page 1 and 2:
Is headspace making a difference to
Page 3 and 4:
Authors This report was written by
Page 5 and 6:
5. Service Delivery Model 73 5.1 Wh
Page 7 and 8:
Table 6.1 Table 6.2 Table 6.3 Main
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 4.9 Figure 4.10 Figure 4.11
Page 11 and 12:
Executive Summary headspace 1 aims
Page 13 and 14:
Executive Summary or very high leve
Page 15 and 16:
Executive Summary through mental he
Page 17 and 18:
value to society of the improvement
Page 19 and 20:
1. Introduction people in Australia
Page 21 and 22:
2. Evaluation Methodology 2.1 Aims
Page 23 and 24:
2. Evaluation Methodology Evaluatio
Page 25 and 26:
2. Evaluation Methodology Table 2.3
Page 27 and 28:
2. Evaluation Methodology Represent
Page 29 and 30:
3. Access and Engagement with Centr
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Th
Page 53 and 54:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients 35
Page 55 and 56:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ch
Page 57 and 58:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients No
Page 59 and 60:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Th
Page 61 and 62:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Fi
Page 63 and 64:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients A
Page 65 and 66:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ta
Page 67 and 68:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients nu
Page 69 and 70:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients No
Page 71 and 72:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Ta
Page 73 and 74:
y three percentage points, and 2.1
Page 75 and 76:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients So
Page 77 and 78:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients I
Page 79 and 80:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients in
Page 81 and 82:
4. Outcomes of headspace Clients Wh
Page 83 and 84:
5. Service Delivery Model For the a
Page 85 and 86:
5. Service Delivery Model the provi
Page 87 and 88:
5. Service Delivery Model headspace
Page 89 and 90:
5. Service Delivery Model services,
Page 91 and 92:
5. Service Delivery Model services
Page 93 and 94:
5. Service Delivery Model Further,
Page 95 and 96:
5. Service Delivery Model that we
Page 97 and 98:
5. Service Delivery Model is a cons
Page 99 and 100:
5. Service Delivery Model connectio
Page 101 and 102:
5. Service Delivery Model Table 5.2
Page 103 and 104:
5. Service Delivery Model Table 5.3
Page 105 and 106:
5. Service Delivery Model I don’t
Page 107 and 108:
5. Service Delivery Model group is
Page 109 and 110:
5. Service Delivery Model Figure 5.
Page 111 and 112:
6. The Costs of headspace One of th
Page 113 and 114:
6. The Costs of headspace Table 6.1
Page 115 and 116:
6. The Costs of headspace In-scope
Page 117 and 118:
6. The Costs of headspace Revenue/
Page 119 and 120:
6. The Costs of headspace Other gov
Page 121 and 122:
7. Conclusion The evaluation of hea
Page 123 and 124:
7. Conclusion treatment); however,
Page 125 and 126:
7. Conclusion Overall the evaluatio
Page 127 and 128:
Appendix A Evaluation scope areas h
Page 129 and 130:
Appendix B The current model of hea
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix B and each SA3 in non-capi
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix B chapter 39 . To determin
Page 135 and 136:
Appendix B While there is an overal
Page 137 and 138:
Appendix B Figure B3 describes the
Page 139 and 140:
Appendix B Figure B5 Cost per young
Page 141 and 142:
Appendix B The concept of access as
Page 143 and 144:
Appendix B Figure B7 Heard of heads
Page 145 and 146:
Figure B10 Proportion of headspace
Page 147 and 148:
Appendix B Table B5 Females 18-25 y
Page 149 and 150:
Appendix B following section. Figur
Page 151 and 152:
Appendix B and less access to mains
Page 153 and 154:
Appendix B Figure B17 Estimated pre
Page 155 and 156:
Appendix B Figure B18 SA1s within 1
Page 157 and 158:
Figure B20 Hypothetical allocation
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix B The current model of cen
Page 161 and 162:
Appendix B Current centre funding m
Page 163 and 164:
Appendix B Evaluation of the curren
Page 165 and 166:
Appendix B Level of funding availab
Page 167 and 168:
Appendix B provide a method for ide
Page 169 and 170:
Appendix B centres and Localities i
Page 171 and 172: Appendix B for greater flexibility
Page 173 and 174: Appendix B Additional consideration
Page 175 and 176: Appendix B of achieving more effici
Page 177 and 178: Appendix B • Used the simulation
Page 179 and 180: Appendix C information relating to
Page 181 and 182: Appendix C Regarding gender, in bot
Page 183 and 184: Appendix C Figure C5 Total number o
Page 185 and 186: Appendix C Table C1 Information Sum
Page 187 and 188: Appendix C Data Cleaning and Analys
Page 189 and 190: Appendix C groups. The age and sex
Page 191 and 192: Appendix C Figure C8 Demographic ch
Page 193 and 194: Appendix C The KeySurvey software s
Page 195 and 196: Appendix C different client groups.
Page 197 and 198: Appendix D Round State Centre Name
Page 199 and 200: Appendix E Characteristics HS clien
Page 201 and 202: Table E4 Cell Sizes for Figure 3.4
Page 203 and 204: Appendix F Figure F1 Changes in K10
Page 205 and 206: Appendix F three SEIFA quintiles. A
Page 207 and 208: Appendix F Occasion of service inte
Page 209 and 210: Appendix F Table F1 Cell sizes for
Page 215 and 216: Appendix G Supplementary material f
Page 217 and 218: Appendix G Table G3 Round 3 (10 cen
Page 219 and 220: Appendix G Table G7 Round 7 (10 cen
Page 221: State (youth population) a headspac
Page 225 and 226: Appendix G Table G12 Round 11(16 ce
Page 227 and 228: Table G16 Additional youth populati
Page 229 and 230: Round Region State Additional youth
Page 231 and 232: State (youth population) a headspac
Page 233 and 234: State (youth population) a headspac
Page 235 and 236: Appendix G Figure G1 Percentage of
Page 243 and 244: Appendix G Table G22 Australians 18
Page 245 and 246: Appendix G Synthetic small area est
Page 247 and 248: Appendix G Figure G16 Estimated pre
Page 253 and 254: Appendix G Figure G22 SA1s within 1
Page 259 and 260: Appendix G Table G25 Centres alloca
Page 261 and 262: References Atkins, D.C., Bedics, J.
Page 263: References Smith, E., Jones, T., Wa
show all

Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?