Is headspace making a difference to young people’s lives?
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
Evaluation-of-headspace-program
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 4.9<br />
Figure 4.10<br />
Figure 4.11<br />
Figure 4.12<br />
Figure 4.13<br />
Figure 4.14<br />
Figure 4.15<br />
Figure 4.16<br />
Figure 4.17<br />
Figure 4.18<br />
Percentage of <strong>headspace</strong> clients who self-harmed in between<br />
waves, by K10 change and intervention survey wave 51<br />
Prevalence of self-harm in the last year across grouped K10<br />
changes: by intervention survey wave and gender 52<br />
Number of days lost in last four weeks due <strong>to</strong> psychological<br />
distress, by K10 change and OoS interval 52<br />
Number of days in last four weeks cut down due <strong>to</strong> psychological<br />
distress, by K10 change and OoS interval 53<br />
Social inclusion indica<strong>to</strong>rs among <strong>headspace</strong> clients, by gender<br />
and intervention survey wave 54<br />
Cumulative average of individual SOFAS changes by gender and<br />
<strong>to</strong>tal number of visits 55<br />
Cumulative average of individual SOFAS <strong>difference</strong>s by gendersexuality<br />
and <strong>to</strong>tal number of visits 55<br />
Cumulative average of change in individual SOFAS scores - by the<br />
primary issue at initial consultation and <strong>to</strong>tal number of visits 56<br />
Proportion of <strong>young</strong> people who transitioned in SOFAS<br />
classification bands from first <strong>to</strong> last occasion of service by<br />
gender-sexuality 58<br />
Proportion of <strong>young</strong> people who transitioned in SOFAS<br />
classification bands from first <strong>to</strong> last occasion of service by <strong>to</strong>tal<br />
number of visits 58<br />
Figure 5.1 Access <strong>to</strong> supports/services for parents/carers at <strong>headspace</strong> 82<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
Proportion of <strong>headspace</strong> clients that received support from<br />
e<strong>headspace</strong>, 2013/14 84<br />
Figure 5.3 Usefulness of range of <strong>headspace</strong> components (n=29) 88<br />
Figure 5.4 Direct funding source for <strong>headspace</strong> occasions of service 89<br />
Figure 5.5 <strong>headspace</strong> clients with a formal referral at first visit, 2013/14 90<br />
Figure 5.6<br />
Figure 5.7<br />
Figure 5.8<br />
Figure 5.9<br />
Figure 5.10<br />
Figure 5.11<br />
Proportion of <strong>headspace</strong> clients with formal referral at the first visit<br />
by state, 2013/14 91<br />
GP referral of <strong>young</strong> patients <strong>to</strong> services within the last 12 months<br />
(n=43) 94<br />
GP referral of <strong>young</strong> patients <strong>to</strong> services within the last 12 months<br />
(respondent numbers) 96<br />
Strategies implemented <strong>to</strong> transition clients from <strong>headspace</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
adult service 98<br />
Level of satisfaction with liaison and collaboration <strong>to</strong> transition<br />
client 98<br />
Extent <strong>to</strong> which <strong>young</strong> person was supported by <strong>headspace</strong><br />
during transition 99<br />
Figure 6.1 Main type of service provided at each visit, 2013/14 financial year 102<br />
Figure 6.2 Direct funding source for <strong>headspace</strong> occasions of service, 2013/14<br />
financial year 105<br />
Social Policy Research Centre 2015<br />
<strong>headspace</strong> Evaluation Final Report<br />
vi