14.03.2017 Views

policymakers demonstrate

EwB_Final_WithCover

EwB_Final_WithCover

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100 Juan J. Dolado<br />

Table 2.2 Political support for transition to SOEC<br />

(Dolado et al., 2015b)<br />

Pro Con Indiff<br />

Young workers Employed 100 a 0 0<br />

Not employed 100 0 0<br />

Older workers Employed 31.7 68.3 0<br />

Not employed 0 0 100<br />

Overall 79.7 10.2 10.1<br />

a<br />

All numerical entries refer to population measures in per cent.<br />

EPL reform, when EPL for unfair dismissals of workers on PC went down from<br />

45 d.w.y.s. to 33 d.w.y.s, whereas compensation for nonrenewal of TC went up<br />

gradually from 8 d.w.y.s. to 12 d.w.y.s. The main finding is that while SOEC<br />

will bring in a welfare gain (in terms of consumption equivalent units for the<br />

current population at the time of the reform) of 1.93 per cent, the 2012 reform<br />

would imply half of that gain.<br />

2.7.3 Single/Unified Contracts in Practice<br />

Nonetheless, a key requirement of all these proposals is the restriction of the<br />

definition of unfair dismissal to false reasons, discrimination and prohibited<br />

grounds. In other words, any economic motive or personal reason related to the<br />

worker’s performance (such as reduction of individual productivity or unsuitability)<br />

would be a fair and justified reason for dismissal, with the judicial<br />

review of courts restricted to just assessing that the purported reason is not<br />

in fact masking prohibited grounds. However, implementing this requirement<br />

might be very difficult in countries whith a long tradition of judicial review of<br />

employers’ decisions (see Ichino et al., 2003 and Jimeno et al., 2015). 15 For this<br />

reason, since the aim of SOEC is to ensure that open-ended contracts become<br />

the default option of firms, they should include a probation period to screen<br />

applicants, as Dolado et al. (2015b) suggest. The objective is not to eliminate<br />

short-duration jobs, but rather to avoid the rotation of temporary workers on the<br />

same job as a means to save costs. Nonetheless, it is clear that the termination of<br />

an open-ended contract is more costly and/or time-consuming for the firm than<br />

the expiration of a fixed-term contract. This is true even if redundancy pay were<br />

equalized across TC and PC. Workers on PC must receive an advance notification<br />

explaining the motive for the dismissal and they have a right to challenge<br />

this decision in court. Moreover, the dismissal of several workers within a short<br />

time may entitle the worker to higher compensation or additional services as<br />

part of a collective dismissal procedure. None of these obligations exists in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!