14.03.2017 Views

policymakers demonstrate

EwB_Final_WithCover

EwB_Final_WithCover

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Winners and Losers of Globalization 241<br />

individual firms, but also to better quantify the aggregate effects of policy. To<br />

understand aggregate effects, we need to rely on industry and macroeconomic<br />

models (discussed in Section 6.3).<br />

Challenge 1 Harmonize firm-level trade and balance sheet data across countries.<br />

Multidimensional Trade Data<br />

Recent empirical work has used customs transactions data to analyse the patterns<br />

of trade. The availability of such data has opened up the possibility to ask<br />

questions beyond the volume of trade and its broad sectoral composition. A typical<br />

customs declaration (which serves as the primary unit of observation for<br />

most trade statistics) records the exporting and the importing firm, the precise<br />

classification of the product being shipped, the precise date of shipments, the<br />

mode of transport and many other logistical details about shipment. This has<br />

made it possible, for example, to study the distribution of trade across products,<br />

destination markets and firms.<br />

Bernard et al. (2007) survey the empirical evidence on multi-product and<br />

multi-country traders. They find that although most exporters (40% of the total)<br />

sell only one product to one destination, most exports are done by large multiproduct,<br />

multi-destination exporters. The number of products and firms shipping<br />

to a particular market increases with market size and decreases with distance.<br />

Similar patterns emerge for imports.<br />

Armenter and Koren (2014) caution that patterns in multidimensional trade<br />

data may be difficult to interpret because such data is sparse. That is, there are<br />

few observations relative to the number of product, firm and country categories.<br />

What is the quantitative relevance of the sparsity of trade data? Armenter and<br />

Koren (2014) build a statistical benchmark (which can be thought of as a special<br />

case of a wide class of economic models), in which trade shipments are ‘randomly’<br />

assigned to trade categories. The randomness is conditional on the size<br />

distribution of firms, countries, and products, so it does not imply that exporters<br />

behave erratically. Such a ‘balls-and-bins’ model can quantitatively fit many of<br />

the statistics reported about the number of exported products, exporting firms,<br />

and export destinations. Given that many models are consistent with the ballsand-bins<br />

framework, we cannot distinguish among them on the basis of such<br />

simple statistics.<br />

We hence need new statistical methods to deal with large multidimensional<br />

trade datasets. Armenter and Koren (2014) do not offer a universal tool, but<br />

their reliance on the statistical properties of the multinomial distribution may<br />

be a useful starting point for further analysis. A more structural approach is<br />

followed by Eaton et al. (2012) and Armenter and Koren (2013), who build<br />

trade models with infrequent purchases.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!