14.03.2017 Views

policymakers demonstrate

EwB_Final_WithCover

EwB_Final_WithCover

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inequality and Welfare: Is Europe Special? 523<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015<br />

Figure 12.3 Stylized trends in the economic literature about inequality: number<br />

of inequality articles (title or keywords) in selected economics journals:<br />

AER, QJE, JPE, RES, Econometrica, J Pub Econ and EJ (Scopus).<br />

Anglo-Saxon world and in fact was the idea pioneered by Dalton (1920) to<br />

measure inequality. This idea of an ethical measure of inequality was brought<br />

into the full view of the economics profession and beyond by Atkinson (1970)<br />

in his seminal paper with his equally distributed equivalent income (EDE). It is<br />

defined as the equal distribution of income which gives the same total welfare<br />

as the actual welfare. The reduction of average income in the EDE in proportion<br />

to the actual average income gives a measure of the waste of resources induced<br />

by the inequality of the income distribution. 6<br />

The second message is that departing from the identity assumption of the<br />

well-being indicator is hazardous and should not be undertaken except in some<br />

well identified cases such as family size, handicap, etc. Here, I fully agree with<br />

the following quote from Saez and Zucman (2014): ‘Redistribution based on<br />

marginal utility is socially acceptable if there are objective reasons a person has<br />

higher needs, such as having a medical condition requiring high expenses, or a<br />

large family with many dependents.’<br />

12.3 Normative and Positive Issues Involving Several Sciences<br />

Maybe the first important observation that is important to convey to a large<br />

public is that inequality and welfare are far from being at the heart of the discipline.<br />

Figures 12.3 and 12.4 illustrate 7 the trend in publication in comparison<br />

with articles devoted to detection of causal phenomena. One can see that<br />

from the late 1970s to the early 1990s it was a topic that had no particular<br />

appeal to economists. Afterwards following the inequality increase in the US<br />

and the UK in the 1980s and 1990s, there was a surge of economists’ interest in<br />

this issue. In 1997, Antony Atkinson gave his presidential address to the Royal<br />

Economic Society titled ‘Bringing Income Distribution in from the Cold’. The<br />

inequality plateaued in both these countries at the beginning of the millennium

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!