14.03.2017 Views

policymakers demonstrate

EwB_Final_WithCover

EwB_Final_WithCover

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 Innovation and Growth: The Schumpeterian<br />

Perspective<br />

Philippe Aghion and Ufuk Akcigit<br />

Abstract<br />

This chapter shows how the Schumpeterian growth paradigm can be used both<br />

to shed light on various aspects of the growth process which cannot be easily<br />

understood using alternative paradigms, and also to think about policies to<br />

foster innovation-led growth in a developed economy. In particular it will: (i)<br />

look at the relationship between growth and competition; (ii) shed light on how<br />

growth relates to firm dynamics and the size distribution of firms; (iii) revisit<br />

the debate on how growth relates to income inequality and social mobility; and<br />

(iv) discuss the role of the state in fostering innovation-led growth, and question<br />

the design and limits of R&D subsidies, or the desirable scope for patent protection,<br />

or whether the government should provide sectoral state aids or instead<br />

limit itself to pure horizontal targeting.<br />

1.1 Introduction<br />

There is a broad consensus among most European leaders and in Brussels on the<br />

importance of structural reforms to foster innovation-based growth in Europe.<br />

However, this consensus has not reached the European public at large. One<br />

recent example is France, where the timid reforms proposed by the Economy<br />

Minister have met opposition from all political parties. So often do we hear that<br />

structural reforms amount to austerity, and therefore are detrimental to growth<br />

and employment. Similarly, a commonly held view is that going for supply<br />

side policies (structural reforms or fiscal devaluations aimed at fostering such<br />

reforms) necessarily means that we have decided to ignore the demand side.<br />

We also hear that a fiscal system conducive to innovation and entrepreneurship<br />

would necessarily aggravate inequality and reduce social mobility. The purpose<br />

of this chapter is twofold: first, to bring the reader up to speed with recent<br />

research in the Economics of Innovation and Growth; second, to provide the<br />

reader with the theoretical and empirical background to think about growth<br />

policy design in EU countries.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!