14.03.2017 Views

policymakers demonstrate

EwB_Final_WithCover

EwB_Final_WithCover

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

254 Cecília Hornok and Miklós Koren<br />

Table 6.1 Percentage equivalents<br />

of trade costs. Source: Anderson<br />

and Van Wincoop (2004), p. 692<br />

Cost component<br />

Transportation 21<br />

Policy barrier 8<br />

Language barrier 7<br />

Currency barrier 14<br />

Information barrier 6<br />

Security barrier 3<br />

Total border costs 44<br />

Distribution 55<br />

Percentage<br />

cent. 2 Estimates of the dispersion of log prices across locations vary between<br />

20 and 40 per cent (Anderson and Van Wincoop, 2004).<br />

The third method infers trade costs from the volume of trade relative to a frictionless<br />

benchmark. This method has been immensely popular, relying mostly<br />

on the gravity equation as the benchmark trade model. 3<br />

Theories of the past decades have incorporated these frictions mostly as taxes<br />

or wedges on import prices. These are often modelled as an ad-valorem cost,<br />

following Samuelson (1954). Recently, other forms of trade costs have also<br />

been modelled and estimated: fixed entry costs of operating in a market, time<br />

costs associated with shipping, fixed costs accruing per shipment, and additive<br />

rather than proportional shipping charges. We will briefly discuss estimates of<br />

each.<br />

Fixed Entry Costs<br />

Entry costs are useful in explaining why many firms do not export. If a firm is<br />

too small, it would not find it profitable to bear the fixed costs associated with<br />

distribution in a given market. Das et al. (2007) estimate a structural model of<br />

exporters with sunk market entry costs, and find that these costs are substantial,<br />

of the order of $400,000. The primary fact identifying such large sunk costs<br />

is that many large firms seem to forego large profit opportunities in foreign<br />

markets and do not enter.<br />

Helpman et al. (2008a) estimate a model of heterogeneous firms with fixed<br />

costs of market entry from macro data: the volume of trade between pairs of<br />

countries. Their estimation is based on the idea that only fixed costs can generate<br />

zero trade flows in the data, variable costs cannot. They show how fixed<br />

costs vary across countries, and that FTAs, a common language, and a common<br />

religion predominantly reduce the fixed costs of trade, not the variable cost.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!