“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID
“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID
“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Activities Inputs Means <strong>of</strong> Verification Important Assumptions<br />
1.1 Knowledge review.<br />
1.2 Survey <strong>of</strong> incidence,<br />
infestation, losses <strong>and</strong><br />
constraints.<br />
1.3 Opening workshop.<br />
2.1 Laboratory Single Killing<br />
Point (SKP) studies.<br />
2.2 Field SKP studies.<br />
2.3 On-Farm trials.<br />
3.1 Study <strong>of</strong> village-level<br />
institutions<br />
3.2. Village-level trials<br />
3.3. Village PRA<br />
1.1 Salaried <strong>and</strong> supervised<br />
researcher; travel<br />
budget.<br />
1.2 Trap, rearing <strong>and</strong><br />
interview survey at<br />
eight locations.<br />
1.3 Workshop in New<br />
Delhi.<br />
2.1. Attractant killing<br />
assessments in wood<br />
laboratory cages at eight<br />
locations.<br />
2.2. Attractant killing<br />
assessments in fields in eight<br />
locations.<br />
2.3. On-Farm trials in eight<br />
locations.<br />
3.1. Output <strong>of</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />
village-level institutions.<br />
3.2. Trial results.<br />
3.3. PRA results.<br />
16<br />
1.1 Tabulated outputs.<br />
1.2 Survey <strong>of</strong> incidence,<br />
infestation <strong>and</strong> losses.<br />
1.3 Opening workshop in<br />
New Delhi.<br />
2.1. Laboratory SKP studies<br />
undertaken <strong>and</strong> written up.<br />
2.2. Field SKP studies<br />
undertaken <strong>and</strong> written up.<br />
2.3. On-Farm trials performed<br />
<strong>and</strong> written up.<br />
3.1. Study report.<br />
3.2. Trial report.<br />
3.3. PRA report.<br />
1.1 Access to libraries <strong>and</strong><br />
respondents.<br />
1.2 Survey <strong>of</strong> incidence,<br />
infestation <strong>and</strong> losses.<br />
1.3 Workshop can be<br />
mounted, with access<br />
<strong>and</strong> accommodation for<br />
invitees.<br />
2.1. Laboratory fly cultures<br />
maintained; non-biased <strong>and</strong><br />
reliable choice chambers<br />
established; clear results<br />
obtained.<br />
2.2. Suitable field sites;<br />
adequate weather <strong>and</strong> field fly<br />
populations; clear results<br />
obtained.<br />
2.3. Access to farm sites<br />
(permission, cooperation,<br />
organisation, transport);<br />
adequate weather <strong>and</strong> field fly<br />
populations; low mortality in<br />
rearing rooms; results<br />
obtained.<br />
3.1. Access; communications.<br />
3.2. Trials can be organised;<br />
participation <strong>and</strong> cooperation.<br />
3.3. Participants accessible<br />
<strong>and</strong> willing; results <strong>of</strong><br />
sufficient interest to<br />
participants.<br />
4. Closing workshop. 4. Workshop in Bangalore. 4. Workshop report. 4. Participants available;<br />
outputs presented <strong>and</strong><br />
synthesised.<br />
20b. Activity chart over the life <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
YEAR 1 2001-2002 MONTH<br />
Activity A M J J A S O N D J F M<br />
1.1. Knowledge review X X X<br />
1.2. Survey <strong>of</strong> incidence, infestation, losses <strong>and</strong> constraints X X X<br />
1.3. Opening workshop X<br />
2.1. Laboratory SKP studies X X X<br />
2.2. Field SKP studies X<br />
2.3. On-farm trials<br />
3.1. Village institution study<br />
3.2. Village-level trials<br />
3.3. Village PRA<br />
4. Closing workshop<br />
Overseas travel<br />
To By A M J J A S O N D J F M<br />
India (Research sites) Stonehouse X X X X<br />
India (ICAR, New Delhi) Mumford X