“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Jujube 11.9 11.9 12 12 12 S Gujarat Patel et al. 1990 Carypomyia vesuviana Jujube 14.9 14.9 15 15 15 S Gujarat Patel et al. 1990 Carypomyia vesuviana Jujube 15 15 15 15 15 S Gujarat Patel et al. 1990 Carypomyia vesuviana Jujube 20.5 20.5 21 21 21 S Gujarat Patel et al. 1990 Carypomyia vesuviana Jujube 2.9 2.9 3 3 3 S Haryana Dashad et al. 1999 Carpomyia vesuviana Jujube 8 4 8 6 S Hisar - Lakra et al. 1991 Jujube 13.7 13.7 14 14 14 S New Delhi Gyi et al. 2003 Carpomyia vesuviana Jujube 15.1 15.1 15 15 15 S New Delhi Gyi et al. 2003 Carpomyia vesuviana Jujube 37.3 37.3 37 37 37 S New Delhi Gyi et al. 2003 Carpomyia vesuviana Jujube 12.4 12.4 12 12 12 S New Delhi Gyi et al. 2003 Carpomyia vesuviana Jujube 11 11 11 11 11 S New Delhi Gyi et al. 2003 Carpomyia vesuviana Jujube 4.6 9.3 5 9 7 S Uttar Pradesh Singh et al. 2000 Carpomya vesuviana Jujube 6.3 6.3 6 6 6 S Uttar Pradesh Singh et al. 2000 Carpomya vesuviana Lemon 61 31 61 46 U Punjab viii Goel et al. 1983 B. dorsalis Mango 1 2 1 2 2 I Karnataka - Shukla et al. 1984 Mango 2 3 2 3 3 I Karnataka - Shukla et al. 1984 Mango 5 5 5 5 5 I Karnataka - IIHR pers. comm. 2001 Mango 5 7 5 7 6 I Karnataka - Tandon and Verghese 1996 Mango 70 35 70 53 N Bihar - Kumar 1995 Mango 30 50 30 50 40 N C. Gujarat - GAU pers.comm. 2001 Mango 19 19 19 19 19 N C. Gujarat - Bagle 1996 Mango 15 15 15 15 15 N C. Gujarat - Bagle 1997 Mango 27 27 27 27 27 N C. Gujarat - Bagle 1998 Mango 27 27 27 27 27 N Gujarat - Kumar et al. 1994 Mango 3 3 3 3 3 N Kanpur iv Dwivedi et al. 2003 Mango 8.2 8.2 8 8 8 N Kanpur V Dwivedi et al. 2003 Integrated Management of Fruit Flies in India: Knowledge Review 26 of 110
Mango 9.8 9.8 10 10 10 N Kanpur vi Dwivedi et al. 2003 Mango 8.3 8.3 8 8 8 N Kanpur vii Dwivedi et al. 2003 Mango 26 31 26 31 29 N Karnataka - Shukla et al. 1984 Mango 30 80 30 80 55 N Karnataka - IIHR pers. comm. 2001 Mango 31 86 31 86 59 N Punjab - Mann 1966 Mango 30 40 30 40 35 N S. Gujarat vi, vii GAU pers.comm. 2001 Mango 20 35 20 35 28 R Gujarat - GAU pers.comm. 2001 Mango 4 10 4 10 7 R - Singh 1990 Mango 7 7 7 7 7 S C. Gujarat - Bagle 1996 Mango 6 6 6 6 6 S C. Gujarat - Bagle 1997 Mango 13 13 13 13 13 S C. Gujarat - Bagle 1998 Mango 5 5 5 5 5 S Gujarat - GAU pers.comm. 2001 Mango 3 3 3 3 3 U Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh iv Dwivedi et al. 2003 B. dorsalis Mango 8.2 8.2 8 8 8 U Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh V Dwivedi et al. 2003 B. dorsalis Mango 9.8 9.8 10 10 10 U Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh vi Dwivedi et al. 2003 B. dorsalis Mango 8.3 8.3 8 8 8 U Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh vii Dwivedi et al. 2003 B. dorsalis Mogekai 16.7 16.7 17 17 17 N Karnataka - Kumar 2003 Moringa 48 49 48 49 49 N Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu ix Murthy and Regupathy 1995 Gitona sp. Moringa 13 20 13 20 17 N Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu xii Murthy and Regupathy 1995 Gitona sp. Moringa 23.4 23.4 23 23 23 N Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu ii Murthy and Regupathy 1995 Gitona sp. Moringa 23.4 12 23 18 N Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu vi Murthy and Regupathy 1995 Gitona sp. Moringa 23 23 23 23 23 N Tamil Nadu iii-vi Murthy and Regupathy 1992 Moringa 12 23 12 23 18 N Tamil Nadu i, ii Murthy and Regupathy 1992 Moringa 13 20 13 20 17 N Tamil Nadu xi,xii Murthy and Regupathy 1992 Moringa 48 49 48 49 49 N Tamil Nadu Viii, ix Murthy and Regupathy 1992 Moringa 15 15 15 15 15 N Tamil Nadu - Ragumoorthy et al. 1998 Integrated Management of Fruit Flies in India: Knowledge Review 27 of 110
Page 1 and 2:
Dear Colleague, Integrated Manageme
Page 3 and 4:
each zone will be divided by the to
Page 5 and 6:
Sheet 2. Production and fruit fly l
Page 7 and 8:
Product: Muskmelon Himalayan Highla
Page 9 and 10:
Product: Snake Gourd Himalayan High
Page 11 and 12:
Integrated Management of Fruit Flie
Page 13 and 14:
Palanpur Pumpkin 2 Anand Bitter Gou
Page 15 and 16:
Integrated Management of Fruit Flie
Page 17 and 18:
Navsari Thiruvananthapuram
Page 19 and 20:
The power of parapheromones. This I
Page 21 and 22:
Cluster “Western” “Southern
Page 23 and 24:
Indian fruit fly control and the So
Page 25 and 26:
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF FRUIT FLIE
Page 27 and 28:
They used to be nearer Ahmedabad, a
Page 29 and 30:
FRUIT FLY CONTROL: SPRAYS (i) Spray
Page 31 and 32:
fruit borer, little leaf (a mycopla
Page 33 and 34:
ores the vine from tender portion,
Page 35 and 36:
(DDVP). He is applying both ME and
Page 37 and 38:
CROPS He said that he is growing bi
Page 39 and 40:
that spraying insecticides is only
Page 41 and 42:
vegetables not by having greater wa
Page 43 and 44:
advantage of bitter gourd? He start
Page 45 and 46:
isk of complete failure of crop. Am
Page 47 and 48:
FF MANAGEMENT He said that he using
Page 49 and 50:
eady-to-harvest fruits. Farmers los
Page 51 and 52:
Gandevi. #G008 DATE: 03/01/04 TEAM:
Page 53 and 54:
#R004 DATE:08/03 TEAM: JT/CVV. He i
Page 55 and 56:
he has found this as very reasonabl
Page 57 and 58:
improving the fertility condition o
Page 59 and 60:
50 cents, banana intercropped in co
Page 61 and 62:
with grass. When the field is left
Page 63 and 64:
sells his own produce. CROPS He gro
Page 65 and 66:
it. When JS mimes a jumping FF magg
Page 67 and 68:
other pests). RICE AND ITS PESTS In
Page 69 and 70:
(mother) feed voraciously on leaf l
Page 71 and 72:
yellow and drop. On opening of the
Page 73 and 74:
including semilooper because fruit
Page 75 and 76:
off prematurely from plants. Thus p
Page 77 and 78:
PEST: FRUIT FLIES Losses: Bitter go
Page 79 and 80:
PEST: SEMILOOPER Creates problems i
Page 81 and 82:
semi looper pest bitter gourd at an
Page 83 and 84:
FRUIT FLIES July sown crop suffers
Page 85 and 86:
LEAF CURL He said that this serious
Page 87 and 88:
only own farm total area five ha. N
Page 89 and 90:
PEST 1 - MANGO HOPPER is number one
Page 91 and 92:
PROJECT MEMORANDUM on behalf of the
Page 93 and 94:
4. Starting and finishing dates 1 J
Page 95 and 96:
Fruit flies, although a serious pes
Page 97 and 98:
Department of Agricultural Extensio
Page 99 and 100:
SECTION C: SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND 17
Page 101 and 102:
Pakistan-UK Fruit Fly Project 1998-
Page 103 and 104:
This will connect the field researc
Page 105 and 106:
Narrative Summary Goal Objectively
Page 107 and 108:
YEAR 2 2002-2003 MONTH Activity A M
Page 109 and 110:
Table I.2. Subjectively-derived syn
Page 111 and 112:
Jujube 3 - S Bawal Dashad et al. (1
Page 113 and 114:
Appendix II. Scientific Research on
Page 115 and 116:
Museum has B. dorsalis specimens re
Page 117 and 118:
and if neem can be used in attracta
Page 119 and 120:
coast. In the Faisalabad area attac
Page 121 and 122:
elative, and offer little real comm
Page 123 and 124:
Appendix III. Work Plan ACTIVITIES
Page 125 and 126:
1.1.4: Tabulation of Controls Findi
Page 127 and 128:
other methods. In fields where loss
Page 129 and 130:
In addition to the Key Informant Su
Page 131 and 132:
killing points”, and these techni
Page 133 and 134:
tiers. It is proposed to replace th
Page 135 and 136:
general benefit. Socially-cooperati
Page 137 and 138:
greater than the sum of their parts
Page 139 and 140:
Appendix IV. Prior Scientific Paper
Page 141 and 142:
vi - Value of cucurbit extract comp
Page 143 and 144: Methods The assessment of BAT and M
Page 145 and 146: surfaces - cotton cloth, plastic sh
Page 147 and 148: Table IV.B.4. Mean total catches (N
Page 149 and 150: Table IV.B.9. Catches over four to
Page 151 and 152: Many improvements may be made to th
Page 153 and 154: economic damage per fly will be gre
Page 155 and 156: Table IV.C.1. Fruit infestation ass
Page 157 and 158: factors (ecoregion, year, season, w
Page 159 and 160: Infestation (%) ANOVA F Tree Mean 3
Page 161 and 162: Appendix V. References Afzal, M, Ma
Page 163 and 164: Jalaluddin, SM, Natarajan, K, Sadak
Page 165 and 166: cucurbitae Coquillett) in cucumber.
Page 167 and 168: Sharma, VP, Lal, OP, Rohidas, SB, P
Page 169 and 170: Project Integrated Management of Fr
Page 171 and 172: Section 1: Indian Fruit and Vegetab
Page 173 and 174: Section 2: Indian Production of Fru
Page 175 and 176: Section 4: Fruit Fly Species Report
Page 177 and 178: 56 Gastrozona balioptera 57 G. fasc
Page 179 and 180: 114 P. tetrica 115 Indacilira basiv
Page 181 and 182: Section 5: Hosts of Tephritid Fruit
Page 183 and 184: 56 Cucumis melo var. utilissimus Cu
Page 185 and 186: 118 Physalis peruviana Solanaceae C
Page 187 and 188: Bactrocera sp. T. dioica Mondouri,
Page 189 and 190: B. cucurbitae Mogekai Karnataka Kum
Page 191 and 192: B. carambolae Andaman Islands Ranga
Page 193: Jujube 20 20 60 40 N Gujarat xi,xii
Page 197 and 198: Cucumber 6.2 6.2 6 6 6 S South Anda
Page 199 and 200: Section 8: Population Dynamics and
Page 201 and 202: B. dorsalis Mango Kanpur, Uttar Pra
Page 203 and 204: C. vesuviana Jujube Haryana Lakra a
Page 205 and 206: Meridarchis scyrodes, Carpomyia ves
Page 207 and 208: B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd Thakur e
Page 209 and 210: B. cucurbitae C melo, C callosus B.
Page 211 and 212: B. correcta Guava Jalaluddin and 19
Page 213 and 214: B. cucurbitae 82 cucurbits Nath et
Page 215 and 216: B. cucurbitae Singh et al. 2000 The
Page 217 and 218: B. cucurbitae Gowda et al. 1979 An
Page 219 and 220: B. cucurbitae Kaur and Srivastava B
Page 221 and 222: B. dorsalis Srivastava et al. 1989
Page 223 and 224: B. dorsalis Prasad and Sethi 1981 T
Page 225 and 226: Section 12: Natural Enemies Host En
Page 227 and 228: Section 13: Cultural Controls Fly H
Page 229 and 230: B. cucurbitae Bhagat and Koul B. cu
Page 231 and 232: B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd Gupta an
Page 233 and 234: B. zonata Peach Himachal Pradesh B.
Page 235 and 236: B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd Mote 197
Page 237 and 238: B. cucurbitae Ccumber, ridge gourd
Page 239 and 240: Zaprionus paravittiger [Z. indianus
Page 241 and 242: B. zonata Apple, peach Solan, Himac
Page 243 and 244: B. cucurbitae B. cucurbitae B. cucu
Page 245 and 246:
Section 16: Pheromone and Colour Lu
Page 247 and 248:
B. dorsalis Mango Pantnagar Uttar P
Page 249 and 250:
B. cucurbitae Snake gourd Banglades
Page 251 and 252:
Bagle, B.G. Prasad, V.G. 1983 Effec
Page 253 and 254:
Borah, S.R. Dutta, S.K. 1997 Infest
Page 255 and 256:
Drew, R.A.I. Raghu, S. 2002 The fru
Page 257 and 258:
Gupta, K. Anand, M. 2002 Effect of
Page 259 and 260:
Kapoor, V.C. Grewal, J.S. Agarwal,
Page 261 and 262:
KrishnaMoorthy, P.N. Srinivasan, K.
Page 263 and 264:
Nair, S. Thomas, J. 2001 Ovipositio
Page 265 and 266:
Patel, R.K. Patel, C.B. 1998 Biolog
Page 267 and 268:
Rahman, S Singh, S.P.N. Agarwal, M.
Page 269 and 270:
Shivarkar, D.T. Dumbre, R.B. 1985 B
Page 271 and 272:
Srivastava, B.G. Pant, N.C. Chaudhr
Page 273 and 274:
Wadhwani, K. Khan, N.H. 1983 Effect
Page 275 and 276:
Anon. 1994 Distribution Maps of Pes
Page 277 and 278:
Anon. 1998 Population dynamics of B
show all

“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?