“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID
“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID
“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
B. cucurbitae C melo, C<br />
callosus<br />
B. cucurbitae Melon, wild<br />
melon<br />
B. cucurbitae Melon, wild<br />
melon<br />
B. cucurbitae Melon, wild<br />
melon<br />
B. cucurbitae Watermelon Jabalpur,<br />
Madhya<br />
Pradesh<br />
Chelliah <strong>and</strong><br />
Samb<strong>and</strong>am<br />
Chelliah <strong>and</strong><br />
Samb<strong>and</strong>am<br />
Chelliah <strong>and</strong><br />
Samb<strong>and</strong>am<br />
Chelliah <strong>and</strong><br />
Samb<strong>and</strong>am<br />
1973 Varieties <strong>of</strong> C. melo, which are highly susceptible to D. cucurbitae, had a higher number <strong>of</strong> aminoacids than<br />
resistant, wild C. callosus. Cystine <strong>and</strong> tyrosine were present in C. melo but not in C. callosus, <strong>and</strong> histidine,<br />
glycine, threonine <strong>and</strong> leucine were present in higher proportions in C. melo. It is concluded that antibiosis in C.<br />
callosus may be due to low concentrations or imbalance <strong>of</strong> essential aminoacids.<br />
1974 Laboratory studies were carried out on the resistance mechanism <strong>of</strong> antibiosis to B. cucurbitae Coq. in the wild<br />
melon Cucumis callosus; the highly susceptible muskmelon cultivars Delta Gold <strong>and</strong> Smith Perfect, <strong>and</strong> the hybrid<br />
C. callosus X Delta Gold were used for comparison. When reared on resistant fruit, larval survival, growth index,<br />
pupal size <strong>and</strong> weight, the ratio <strong>of</strong> adult females to males, fecundity <strong>and</strong> adult life-span were lower, the larval period<br />
was longer, <strong>and</strong> there was little effect on the pupal period.<br />
1974 The highly susceptible C. melo variety Delta Gold <strong>and</strong> its hybrid with C. callosus were used in tests in the laboratory<br />
to determine the resistance mechanism to B. cucurbitae in C. callosus. Variation in the number <strong>of</strong> eggs laid in the<br />
different fruit types revealed that nonpreference for C. callosus resulted from the combined influence <strong>of</strong> a tough rind<br />
<strong>and</strong> the biochemical properties <strong>of</strong> the fruit.<br />
1974 Of 69 muskmelon accessions screened, 9 were resistant, 7 susceptible <strong>and</strong> the remainder highly susceptible to fruit<br />
fly. The wild C. callosus, however, was highly resistant, <strong>and</strong> since it will hybridize with muskmelon it is likely to be <strong>of</strong><br />
value in breeding.<br />
Choubey et al. 2002 An experiment was conducted in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India during the 1991 summer season to evaluate the<br />
varietal response <strong>of</strong> watermelon cultivars MHW-11, Arka Jyoti, MHW-4, MHWHM-101, MHW-6, MHW-5, <strong>and</strong><br />
Madhu, against melon fruit fly (B. cucurbitae). Arka Jyoti was the least susceptible (38.81%) under Jabalpur<br />
conditions.<br />
Mango Dan et al. 1989 The hybrids Totapuri X Alphonso (T X A) <strong>and</strong> Totapuri X Mulgoa (T X M) gave larger fruits with smaller stones than<br />
their parents. Hybrid T X A had a high fibre content, which made it suitable only for juice production, but was more<br />
susceptible to fruit fly than its parents. Quality <strong>of</strong> juice was rated in the order Alphonso > T X A > T X M > Totapuri ><br />
Mulgoa. Both hybrids had lower sugar:acid ratios than their parents. The hybrid Banganpalli X Alphonso was<br />
suitable for canned slice production <strong>and</strong> was rated as superior to Banganpalli <strong>and</strong> only slightly inferior to Alphonso,<br />
which has smaller fruits with larger stones than the hybrid.<br />
Integrated Management <strong>of</strong> Fruit Flies in India: Knowledge Review 41 <strong>of</strong> 110