“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Moringa 10 10 10 10 10 S Tamil Nadu - Ragumoorthy et al. 1998 Narangi 24 24 24 24 24 U Punjab viii Goel et al. 1983 B. dorsalis Peach 41.7 41.7 42 42 42 N Himachal Pradesh Sharma et al. 1973 B. dorsalis, B. cucurbitae, D. ciliatus Peach 3.45 3.45 3 3 3 S Himachal Pradesh Sharma et al. 1973 B. dorsalis, B. cucurbitae, D. ciliatus Peach 8.11 8.11 8 8 8 S Himachal Pradesh Sharma et al. 1973 B. dorsalis, B. cucurbitae, D. ciliatus Phalsa 64 64 64 64 64 N Punjab - Mann 1994 Sapota 30 50 30 50 40 N S. Gujarat vii-ix GAU pers.comm. 2001 Bitter gourd 60 60 60 60 60 N H. Pradesh Vii,ix Gupta et al. 1992 Bitter gourd 80 80 80 80 80 N H. Pradesh vii,viii Gupta et al. 1992 Bitter gourd 47 47 47 47 47 N Kerala - Dale and Jiji 1997 Bitter gourd 31.3 31.3 31 31 31 N Singh et al. 2000 B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd 87 87 87 87 87 N Ravindranath and Pillai 1986 B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd 37 53 37 53 45 S Ravindranath and Pillai 1986 B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd 59 59 59 59 59 S Ravindranath and Pillai 1986 B. cucurbitae Cucumber 13 13 13 13 13 B Bangladesh - Nasir Uddin et al. 2000 Cucumber 2 2 2 2 2 M Bangladesh - Nasir Uddin et al. 2000 Cucumber 20 20 20 20 20 N Assam x-iii Borah 1996 Cucumber 28 28 28 28 28 N Assam vi-x Borah 1996 Cucumber 39 39 39 39 39 N Assam - Borah 1996 Cucumber 27.6 27.6 28 28 28 N Assam iv Borah 1996 B. cucurbitae Cucumber 59.5 59.5 60 60 60 N Assam vii Borah 1996 B. cucurbitae Cucumber 20.3 20.3 20 20 20 N Assam ix Borah 1996 B. cucurbitae Cucumber 22 22 22 22 22 N Bangladesh - Nasir Uddin et al. 2000 Cucumber 80 80 80 80 80 N H. Pradesh vii,viii Gupta et al. 1992 Cucumber 53 53 53 53 53 N Karnataka - IIHR pers. comm. 2001 Cucumber 39 39 39 39 39 N South Andaman Ranganath et al. 1997 B. cucurbitae Cucumber 21 21 21 21 21 S Karnataka - IIHR pers. comm. 2001 Integrated Management of Fruit Flies in India: Knowledge Review 28 of 110
Cucumber 6.2 6.2 6 6 6 S South Andaman Ranganath et al. 1997 B. cucurbitae Little gourd 100 50 100 75 N Gujarat - Farmer pers.comm. 2001 Little gourd 63 32 63 47 N Gujarat - Patel 1994 Little gourd 45 45 45 45 45 N Gujarat iii Patel and Patel 1996 Little gourd 46 46 46 46 46 N Gujarat iv Patel and Patel 1996 Little gourd 38 38 38 38 38 N Gujarat vi Patel and Patel 1996 Little gourd 3 100 3 100 52 N Gujarat - Patel 1996 Little gourd 5 5 5 5 5 S Gujarat - Farmer pers.comm. 2001 Little gourd 0 0 0 50 25 S Gujarat - Patel 1994 Melon 76 100 76 100 88 N Rajasthan - Pareek and Kavadia 1995 Melon 51 75 51 75 63 R Rajasthan - Pareek and Kavadia 1995 Musk melon 51 75 51 75 63 N Rajasthan Pareek and Kavadia 1995 B. cucubitae Musk melon 76 100 76 100 88 N than Pareek and Kavadia 1995 B. cucubitae Pumpkin 26.7 39.3 27 39 33 N - Saikia and Nath 2002 Pumpkin 26.7 39.3 27 39 33 N Saikia and Nath 2002 Ridge gourd 0 0 0 50 25 N Gujarat - GAU, pers.comm 2001 Ridge gourd 0 0 0 50 25 N Gujarat - Farmer, pers.comm 2001 Ridge gourd 32.9 32.9 33 33 33 N South Andaman Ranganath et al. 1997 B. cucurbitae Ridge gourd 9.1 9.5 9 10 9 S South Andaman Ranganath et al. 1997 B. cucurbitae Snake gourd 4.9 8.6 5 9 7 B Bangladesh Nasiruddin and Karim 1992 B. cucurbitae Snake gourd 63 63 63 63 63 N Assam - Borah and Dutta 1997 Snake gourd 62.6 62.6 63 63 63 N Assam Borah and Dutta 1997 B. tau, Callantra Snake gourd 22.5 22.5 23 23 23 N Bangladesh Nasiruddin and Karim 1992 B. cucurbitae Sponge gourd 50 50 50 50 50 N H. Pradesh Vii,ix Gupta et al. 1992 Watermelon 28.6 28.6 29 29 29 N Singh et al. 2000 B. cucurbitae Watermelon 38.8 38.8 39 39 39 R Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh vii Choubey et al. 2002 B. cucurbitae Gen. Cucurbits 75 75 75 75 75 N Bihar iv-ix Farmer, pers.comm 2001 Gen. Cucurbits 40 80 40 80 60 N Delhi vii-x Pruthi 1941 Integrated Management of Fruit Flies in India: Knowledge Review 29 of 110
Page 1 and 2:
Dear Colleague, Integrated Manageme
Page 3 and 4:
each zone will be divided by the to
Page 5 and 6:
Sheet 2. Production and fruit fly l
Page 7 and 8:
Product: Muskmelon Himalayan Highla
Page 9 and 10:
Product: Snake Gourd Himalayan High
Page 11 and 12:
Integrated Management of Fruit Flie
Page 13 and 14:
Palanpur Pumpkin 2 Anand Bitter Gou
Page 15 and 16:
Integrated Management of Fruit Flie
Page 17 and 18:
Navsari Thiruvananthapuram
Page 19 and 20:
The power of parapheromones. This I
Page 21 and 22:
Cluster “Western” “Southern
Page 23 and 24:
Indian fruit fly control and the So
Page 25 and 26:
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF FRUIT FLIE
Page 27 and 28:
They used to be nearer Ahmedabad, a
Page 29 and 30:
FRUIT FLY CONTROL: SPRAYS (i) Spray
Page 31 and 32:
fruit borer, little leaf (a mycopla
Page 33 and 34:
ores the vine from tender portion,
Page 35 and 36:
(DDVP). He is applying both ME and
Page 37 and 38:
CROPS He said that he is growing bi
Page 39 and 40:
that spraying insecticides is only
Page 41 and 42:
vegetables not by having greater wa
Page 43 and 44:
advantage of bitter gourd? He start
Page 45 and 46:
isk of complete failure of crop. Am
Page 47 and 48:
FF MANAGEMENT He said that he using
Page 49 and 50:
eady-to-harvest fruits. Farmers los
Page 51 and 52:
Gandevi. #G008 DATE: 03/01/04 TEAM:
Page 53 and 54:
#R004 DATE:08/03 TEAM: JT/CVV. He i
Page 55 and 56:
he has found this as very reasonabl
Page 57 and 58:
improving the fertility condition o
Page 59 and 60:
50 cents, banana intercropped in co
Page 61 and 62:
with grass. When the field is left
Page 63 and 64:
sells his own produce. CROPS He gro
Page 65 and 66:
it. When JS mimes a jumping FF magg
Page 67 and 68:
other pests). RICE AND ITS PESTS In
Page 69 and 70:
(mother) feed voraciously on leaf l
Page 71 and 72:
yellow and drop. On opening of the
Page 73 and 74:
including semilooper because fruit
Page 75 and 76:
off prematurely from plants. Thus p
Page 77 and 78:
PEST: FRUIT FLIES Losses: Bitter go
Page 79 and 80:
PEST: SEMILOOPER Creates problems i
Page 81 and 82:
semi looper pest bitter gourd at an
Page 83 and 84:
FRUIT FLIES July sown crop suffers
Page 85 and 86:
LEAF CURL He said that this serious
Page 87 and 88:
only own farm total area five ha. N
Page 89 and 90:
PEST 1 - MANGO HOPPER is number one
Page 91 and 92:
PROJECT MEMORANDUM on behalf of the
Page 93 and 94:
4. Starting and finishing dates 1 J
Page 95 and 96:
Fruit flies, although a serious pes
Page 97 and 98:
Department of Agricultural Extensio
Page 99 and 100:
SECTION C: SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND 17
Page 101 and 102:
Pakistan-UK Fruit Fly Project 1998-
Page 103 and 104:
This will connect the field researc
Page 105 and 106:
Narrative Summary Goal Objectively
Page 107 and 108:
YEAR 2 2002-2003 MONTH Activity A M
Page 109 and 110:
Table I.2. Subjectively-derived syn
Page 111 and 112:
Jujube 3 - S Bawal Dashad et al. (1
Page 113 and 114:
Appendix II. Scientific Research on
Page 115 and 116:
Museum has B. dorsalis specimens re
Page 117 and 118:
and if neem can be used in attracta
Page 119 and 120:
coast. In the Faisalabad area attac
Page 121 and 122:
elative, and offer little real comm
Page 123 and 124:
Appendix III. Work Plan ACTIVITIES
Page 125 and 126:
1.1.4: Tabulation of Controls Findi
Page 127 and 128:
other methods. In fields where loss
Page 129 and 130:
In addition to the Key Informant Su
Page 131 and 132:
killing points”, and these techni
Page 133 and 134:
tiers. It is proposed to replace th
Page 135 and 136:
general benefit. Socially-cooperati
Page 137 and 138:
greater than the sum of their parts
Page 139 and 140:
Appendix IV. Prior Scientific Paper
Page 141 and 142:
vi - Value of cucurbit extract comp
Page 143 and 144:
Methods The assessment of BAT and M
Page 145 and 146: surfaces - cotton cloth, plastic sh
Page 147 and 148: Table IV.B.4. Mean total catches (N
Page 149 and 150: Table IV.B.9. Catches over four to
Page 151 and 152: Many improvements may be made to th
Page 153 and 154: economic damage per fly will be gre
Page 155 and 156: Table IV.C.1. Fruit infestation ass
Page 157 and 158: factors (ecoregion, year, season, w
Page 159 and 160: Infestation (%) ANOVA F Tree Mean 3
Page 161 and 162: Appendix V. References Afzal, M, Ma
Page 163 and 164: Jalaluddin, SM, Natarajan, K, Sadak
Page 165 and 166: cucurbitae Coquillett) in cucumber.
Page 167 and 168: Sharma, VP, Lal, OP, Rohidas, SB, P
Page 169 and 170: Project Integrated Management of Fr
Page 171 and 172: Section 1: Indian Fruit and Vegetab
Page 173 and 174: Section 2: Indian Production of Fru
Page 175 and 176: Section 4: Fruit Fly Species Report
Page 177 and 178: 56 Gastrozona balioptera 57 G. fasc
Page 179 and 180: 114 P. tetrica 115 Indacilira basiv
Page 181 and 182: Section 5: Hosts of Tephritid Fruit
Page 183 and 184: 56 Cucumis melo var. utilissimus Cu
Page 185 and 186: 118 Physalis peruviana Solanaceae C
Page 187 and 188: Bactrocera sp. T. dioica Mondouri,
Page 189 and 190: B. cucurbitae Mogekai Karnataka Kum
Page 191 and 192: B. carambolae Andaman Islands Ranga
Page 193 and 194: Jujube 20 20 60 40 N Gujarat xi,xii
Page 195: Mango 9.8 9.8 10 10 10 N Kanpur vi
Page 199 and 200: Section 8: Population Dynamics and
Page 201 and 202: B. dorsalis Mango Kanpur, Uttar Pra
Page 203 and 204: C. vesuviana Jujube Haryana Lakra a
Page 205 and 206: Meridarchis scyrodes, Carpomyia ves
Page 207 and 208: B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd Thakur e
Page 209 and 210: B. cucurbitae C melo, C callosus B.
Page 211 and 212: B. correcta Guava Jalaluddin and 19
Page 213 and 214: B. cucurbitae 82 cucurbits Nath et
Page 215 and 216: B. cucurbitae Singh et al. 2000 The
Page 217 and 218: B. cucurbitae Gowda et al. 1979 An
Page 219 and 220: B. cucurbitae Kaur and Srivastava B
Page 221 and 222: B. dorsalis Srivastava et al. 1989
Page 223 and 224: B. dorsalis Prasad and Sethi 1981 T
Page 225 and 226: Section 12: Natural Enemies Host En
Page 227 and 228: Section 13: Cultural Controls Fly H
Page 229 and 230: B. cucurbitae Bhagat and Koul B. cu
Page 231 and 232: B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd Gupta an
Page 233 and 234: B. zonata Peach Himachal Pradesh B.
Page 235 and 236: B. cucurbitae Bitter gourd Mote 197
Page 237 and 238: B. cucurbitae Ccumber, ridge gourd
Page 239 and 240: Zaprionus paravittiger [Z. indianus
Page 241 and 242: B. zonata Apple, peach Solan, Himac
Page 243 and 244: B. cucurbitae B. cucurbitae B. cucu
Page 245 and 246: Section 16: Pheromone and Colour Lu
Page 247 and 248:
B. dorsalis Mango Pantnagar Uttar P
Page 249 and 250:
B. cucurbitae Snake gourd Banglades
Page 251 and 252:
Bagle, B.G. Prasad, V.G. 1983 Effec
Page 253 and 254:
Borah, S.R. Dutta, S.K. 1997 Infest
Page 255 and 256:
Drew, R.A.I. Raghu, S. 2002 The fru
Page 257 and 258:
Gupta, K. Anand, M. 2002 Effect of
Page 259 and 260:
Kapoor, V.C. Grewal, J.S. Agarwal,
Page 261 and 262:
KrishnaMoorthy, P.N. Srinivasan, K.
Page 263 and 264:
Nair, S. Thomas, J. 2001 Ovipositio
Page 265 and 266:
Patel, R.K. Patel, C.B. 1998 Biolog
Page 267 and 268:
Rahman, S Singh, S.P.N. Agarwal, M.
Page 269 and 270:
Shivarkar, D.T. Dumbre, R.B. 1985 B
Page 271 and 272:
Srivastava, B.G. Pant, N.C. Chaudhr
Page 273 and 274:
Wadhwani, K. Khan, N.H. 1983 Effect
Page 275 and 276:
Anon. 1994 Distribution Maps of Pes
Page 277 and 278:
Anon. 1998 Population dynamics of B
show all

“Key Informant Survey” of Production, Value, Losses and ... - DfID

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?