12.12.2020 Views

Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology

by L. Antonio Curet, Shannon Lee Dawdy, and Gabino La Rosa Corzo

by L. Antonio Curet, Shannon Lee Dawdy, and Gabino La Rosa Corzo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142 / Valcárcel Rojas and Rodríguez Arce<br />

copper, and silver and the guanín bell belong to a non-Antillean typology.<br />

J. R. Oliver (2000:201, 216n.37) considers that the bird piece could have orig<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

from the Caribbean coast of Colombia, perhaps related to the Tairona<br />

culture. It is unknown how and when it was <strong>in</strong>troduced to the island, but <strong>in</strong><br />

any case the dist<strong>in</strong>ctive character that these objects lent their users is notable<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g both the pre-Hispanic period and after the European <strong>in</strong>vasion. It is<br />

important to mention that while the speci¤c relations between this community<br />

and the Europeans are not clear, the presence of three skeletons (nos. 39,<br />

69, 84) with postcolumbian dates and metal objects <strong>in</strong>dicates the presence of<br />

status differentiation <strong>in</strong> late times and, possibly, with<strong>in</strong> the context of direct<br />

contact with the Spanish.<br />

CEMETERY AND CEREMONIAL SPACE<br />

El Chorro de Maíta’s burial area is located approximately <strong>in</strong> the center of the<br />

archaeological site. Its dimensions (2,000 m 2 ) are similar to those of the central<br />

spaces of many large sites <strong>in</strong> Banes. The use of central clear<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> villages<br />

for social exchange and ceremonial activities has been widely reported for<br />

Cuba based on revised historical <strong>in</strong>terpretations (Moreira 1999:11; Tr<strong>in</strong>cado<br />

1984:49). Consider<strong>in</strong>g its location and the fact that no other cleared area has<br />

been found that could have functioned as a plaza, the possibility that the<br />

cemetery area was used for this purpose cannot be discarded. There is no<br />

archaeological evidence for any k<strong>in</strong>d of feature that would delimit this area.<br />

In the southern part, Unit 5, domestic rema<strong>in</strong>s affect<strong>in</strong>g a burial were located,<br />

possibly <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g an encroachment of the residential areas <strong>in</strong>to the burial<br />

area around 730 ± 60 b.p. (Beta—148957; charred wood; d 13c/12c = −25 percent).<br />

The conditions of the domestic-funeral contact <strong>in</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g edges<br />

of the burial area are not clear. There are no concentrations of domestic residuals<br />

<strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> central area. When they do appear, the deposits are th<strong>in</strong><br />

and isolated, deposited by natural erosion processes. The fact that this space<br />

was kept cleared <strong>in</strong>dicates that its special function was recognized and its<br />

dimensions were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

The burial area presents two well-differentiated soil layers. The super¤cial<br />

layer is between 10 and 30 cm thick and consists of a limestone-based brown<br />

soil, rich <strong>in</strong> phosphates and organic matter, with an acid pH. The lower layer<br />

is formed by limestone chalk of yellowish color, lack<strong>in</strong>g phosphates and with<br />

an alkal<strong>in</strong>e pH. The few skeletons or parts of skeletons present <strong>in</strong> the ¤rst layer<br />

had heavy deterioration because of the acidity of the soil. The skeletons <strong>in</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!