12.12.2020 Views

Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology

by L. Antonio Curet, Shannon Lee Dawdy, and Gabino La Rosa Corzo

by L. Antonio Curet, Shannon Lee Dawdy, and Gabino La Rosa Corzo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Slavery at a <strong>Cuban</strong> Coffee Plantation / 195<br />

slaved community without slaveholder ledgers or other records <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

what foods were purchased for them. Most of the identi¤able bone is pig (Sus<br />

scrofa), an animal typically raised <strong>in</strong> house or barnyard situations rather than<br />

herded like cattle (Bos taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), or goat (Capra hircus) (Reitz<br />

and W<strong>in</strong>g 1999:285–286). Joseph Dimock, a n<strong>in</strong>eteenth-century visitor to<br />

Cuba, observed that enslaved <strong>Cuban</strong>s were permitted to “raise chickens, a pig,<br />

and sometimes a mare” (1998 [1846]:96). Therefore, the recovered food rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />

were more likely from slave-owned animals than those raised on the<br />

stock-rais<strong>in</strong>g farm. Discrete trash deposits conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g organic refuse, however,<br />

have not yet been uncovered at the El Padre slave village, so any de¤nitive<br />

statement regard<strong>in</strong>g slave diet at the cafetal must await additional excavations.<br />

Craft production offered enslaved people another possibility for mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

items for their own use and for trade. Abiel Abbott observed enslaved <strong>Cuban</strong>s<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g hats from palm leaves <strong>in</strong> the quote cited, and it is likely that they<br />

made other items from these leaves. Unfortunately, it is dif¤cult to document<br />

the mak<strong>in</strong>g of basketry and other textiles from archaeological sources. While<br />

the archaeological evidence for craft production at the El Padre slave village<br />

is slim compared to African-American sites that have yielded evidence of<br />

pottery-mak<strong>in</strong>g, wood-work<strong>in</strong>g, button-mak<strong>in</strong>g, or iron-work<strong>in</strong>g, a few artifacts<br />

suggest craft-mak<strong>in</strong>g activities. Glass scrapers offer one possibility. These<br />

artifacts made from broken bottle glass are similar to those found at other sites<br />

occupied by people of African descent (Armstrong 2003; Wilkie 1996). These<br />

scrapers could be used for a variety of purposes, but they are most often associated<br />

with wood-work<strong>in</strong>g. Another possibility of craft production is the<br />

reuse of discarded pipe bowls for smooth<strong>in</strong>g or polish<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>in</strong>terior surfaces<br />

of several recovered pipe bowl fragments exhibit considerable wear resembl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that found on objects used for smooth<strong>in</strong>g or polish<strong>in</strong>g materials<br />

such as wood, bone, hide, or possibly pottery. The wear appears to have occurred<br />

after the pipe bowls were broken and were no longer usable for smok<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Expressive Culture<br />

The most curious artifacts recovered from the El Padre slave village are ceramic<br />

discs measur<strong>in</strong>g 8–15 mm. They appear to have been made by smooth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the edges of broken ceramics <strong>in</strong>to rounded forms. Perhaps the pipe bowl<br />

fragments were used to make these artifacts. Similar discs have been found at<br />

a variety of sites <strong>in</strong> other world areas, for example, at post–European contact<br />

sites <strong>in</strong> Africa (Gerard Chou<strong>in</strong>, personal communication, 2001) and at Spanish<br />

missions <strong>in</strong> California (Lourdes Domínguez, personal communication,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!