12.12.2020 Views

Dialogues in Cuban Archaeology

by L. Antonio Curet, Shannon Lee Dawdy, and Gabino La Rosa Corzo

by L. Antonio Curet, Shannon Lee Dawdy, and Gabino La Rosa Corzo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rock Art Research <strong>in</strong> Cuba / 77<br />

cave “without religious biases” and that the Taíno later replaced them, pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the images (but leav<strong>in</strong>g no other rema<strong>in</strong>s) <strong>in</strong> the cave they used exclusively<br />

as a temple (Herrera Fritot 1939:31–32). This conclusion was based <strong>in</strong> part on<br />

perceived stylistic similarities between the images and Taíno ceramics studied<br />

by de Booy (1915, 1919), as well as with petroglyphs studied by Harr<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

<strong>in</strong> Cuba and by Huckerby (1914, 1921) <strong>in</strong> Grenada and Sa<strong>in</strong>t V<strong>in</strong>cent islands.<br />

8 This <strong>in</strong>terpretation was also clearly <strong>in</strong>®uenced by the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

assessment provided by Ortiz. However, although Ortiz had <strong>in</strong>deed suggested<br />

that the cave functioned as a “Precolumbian Temple,” his evaluation of surface<br />

¤nds at the site led him to <strong>in</strong>fer that the images were probably produced<br />

by “Ciboney” peoples (Ortiz, May 24, 1922, recorded <strong>in</strong> Herrera Fritot 1939:<br />

10). This sparked a cultural attribution debate among <strong>Cuban</strong> archaeologists,<br />

one that extended beyond Punta del Este to question the association between<br />

rock art and other cultural rema<strong>in</strong>s found <strong>in</strong> caves throughout Cuba. 9 It<br />

would be more than 30 years before the accumulation of archaeological data<br />

and development of archaeological thought <strong>in</strong> Cuba would settle the debate<br />

and credit those who left other cultural rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Cueva No. 1 with also<br />

produc<strong>in</strong>g the images that embellish its walls (La Rosa Corzo 1994). 10<br />

ANTONIO NÚÑEZ JIMÉNEZ AND<br />

THE SOCIEDAD ESPELEOLÓGICA DE CUBA (SEC)<br />

The “Petroglyphs and Pictographs” subhead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Cuba section of the<br />

bibliographic work Ancient Caribbean (Weeks and Ferbel 1994) is tell<strong>in</strong>g. Although<br />

it by no means provides a comprehensive list<strong>in</strong>g of the relevant published<br />

works on the topic, the three works listed were all produced by the same<br />

researcher. That person, who more than anyone else has contributed to the<br />

study and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of knowledge of rock art <strong>in</strong> Cuba, was Antonio<br />

Núñez Jiménez. If, <strong>in</strong>deed, Ortiz is synonymous with the island of Cuba<br />

(Pérez Firmat 1989), Núñez Jiménez is synonymous with the cave art of the<br />

archipelago. The list of his extensive publications on rock art alone spans<br />

nearly half a century, a long period of time dur<strong>in</strong>g which he tirelessly spearheaded<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tense efforts of a diverse group of scientists to <strong>in</strong>crease their<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of the geology, geography, speleology, prehistory, and, <strong>in</strong>deed,<br />

all aspects of the <strong>Cuban</strong> landscape.<br />

The long and dist<strong>in</strong>guished career of Núñez Jiménez began on January 15,<br />

1940, when, at just sixteen years of age, he founded the Sociedad Espeleológica<br />

de Cuba (SEC), an organization dedicated to the fundamental goals of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!