Iranians and Greeks in South Russia - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian ...
Iranians and Greeks in South Russia - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian ...
Iranians and Greeks in South Russia - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ii6 THE SARMATIANS<br />
stage <strong>in</strong> the war which Mithridates the Great was wag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Crimea. Beh<strong>in</strong>d the Roxalans, another of Strabo's <strong>in</strong>formants, the<br />
authority used for the eleventh book, Theophanes of Mytilene, a<br />
contemporary of Pompey <strong>and</strong> his biographer, alludes to Aorsians as<br />
occupy<strong>in</strong>g the left bank of the Don <strong>and</strong> the shores of the Sea of Azov,<br />
<strong>and</strong> to Siracians as hold<strong>in</strong>g the valley of the Kuban. Farther east<br />
we must suppose that the Alans were supreme : it is not long before<br />
they appear as the dom<strong>in</strong>ant tribe <strong>in</strong> the eastern steppes of <strong>South</strong><br />
<strong>Russia</strong>.<br />
The earUest reference to the Alans belongs to the year A. D. 35.<br />
Josephus, who mentions them, leads us to suppose that they had<br />
held the Kuban valley for some time, <strong>and</strong> were try<strong>in</strong>g to force their<br />
way, through the passes of the Caucasus, to Iberia <strong>and</strong> Armenia, with<br />
the ultimate <strong>in</strong>tention of fight<strong>in</strong>g the Parthians. It seems, however,<br />
that their attempt was frustrated, that they turned aside <strong>and</strong> followed<br />
the other Sarmatian tribes towards the Don <strong>and</strong> the Dnieper. In<br />
A. D. 49, dur<strong>in</strong>g the troubles which arose <strong>in</strong> the Cimmerian Bosphorus,<br />
the immediate neighbours of the Bosphoran k<strong>in</strong>gdom were Aorsians<br />
<strong>and</strong> Siracians, not Alans. But these tribes seem to have been gradually<br />
<strong>in</strong>vaded by the Alans <strong>and</strong> to have comb<strong>in</strong>ed with them to form a unit<br />
which was thenceforth known by the name of the dom<strong>in</strong>ant tribe,<br />
the Alans. The cont<strong>in</strong>ual advance of the Sarmatians soon carried<br />
them beyond the Dnieper <strong>in</strong> the direction of the Danube. In A. D. 50,<br />
we f<strong>in</strong>d the lazygians between Theiss <strong>and</strong> Danube, <strong>and</strong> the Roxalans<br />
beyond the Dnieper.<br />
The Sarmatians now became an imm<strong>in</strong>ent danger to Roman<br />
power, which was threatened from two different quarters. The<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>and</strong> vassal k<strong>in</strong>gdoms south of the Caucasus daily anticipated<br />
a flood of conquerors from the steppes beside the Kuban, while the<br />
Danubian prov<strong>in</strong>ces were already feehng the pressure of the Sarmatian<br />
vanguard. Little is known about the conditions on the Dnieper<br />
at this period, <strong>and</strong> between Dnieper <strong>and</strong> Danube. The region seems<br />
to have been the meet<strong>in</strong>g-place of several currents : a Thracian<br />
current of Getians or Dacians, who took Olbia <strong>in</strong> the middle of the<br />
first century B. c. ; a Celto-Germanic current of Galatians <strong>and</strong><br />
Scirians <strong>in</strong> the third century, <strong>and</strong> later of Bastarnians, who appear<br />
to have occupied at least a portion of the Dnieper bas<strong>in</strong> ;<br />
<strong>and</strong>, lastly,<br />
the Sarmatian current. What matters most to us, is that from this<br />
period, the first century B. c, the <strong>Iranians</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed regular <strong>and</strong><br />
sometimes cordial relations with the Germanic <strong>and</strong> Thracian tribes,<br />
<strong>and</strong> that they dwelt side by side with them <strong>in</strong> the succeed<strong>in</strong>g centuries.<br />
From the first century b. c, therefore, Rome had to face a new