Iranians and Greeks in South Russia - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian ...
Iranians and Greeks in South Russia - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian ...
Iranians and Greeks in South Russia - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
i6 THE PREHISTORIC CIVILIZATIONS<br />
The neolithic pa<strong>in</strong>ted pottery of the Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian or Tripolye type,<br />
so called from a hamlet near Kiev where Chvojka found the first<br />
examples, belongs to a group of Central <strong>and</strong> <strong>South</strong> European pottery<br />
which we call spiral <strong>and</strong> mae<strong>and</strong>er pottery. Wherever it is found, it is<br />
partly pa<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>and</strong> partly <strong>in</strong>cised. Its presence has been observed <strong>in</strong><br />
several districts, from the shores of the Adriatic to the shores of the<br />
Black Sea. Its expansion co<strong>in</strong>cides approximately with the bas<strong>in</strong>s of<br />
the Danube <strong>and</strong> its tributaries, of the Dniester, the Bug, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Dnieper. I cannot deal with all the difficult <strong>and</strong> delicate questions<br />
which have been raised by the various types of this ware : which<br />
came first, <strong>in</strong>cised or pa<strong>in</strong>ted decoration ; what was the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<br />
centre, the shores of the Adriatic, or the shores of the Black Sea ;<br />
what is the relation between this pottery <strong>and</strong> the different racial groups<br />
which subsequently formed the population of Western Europe.<br />
What concerns us chiefly is the generally accepted fact that the<br />
Tripolye type of pa<strong>in</strong>ted pottery—the pottery of <strong>South</strong> <strong>Russia</strong>,<br />
Gahcia, <strong>and</strong> Rumania—is the richest <strong>and</strong> most highly developed<br />
branch of the family, <strong>and</strong> the most orig<strong>in</strong>al as well. The shapes show<br />
great wealth <strong>and</strong> variety compared with those on the Danube <strong>and</strong> its<br />
tributaries. The ornamentation is by no means restricted to spiral<br />
<strong>and</strong> mae<strong>and</strong>er. As <strong>in</strong> the contemporary pottery of Susa, the geometric<br />
decoration is comb<strong>in</strong>ed with geometriz<strong>in</strong>g animal <strong>and</strong> vegetable decoration<br />
which uses as ornaments figures of men, animals, <strong>and</strong> plants.<br />
Even the arrangement of the ornament <strong>in</strong> parallel zones, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
so-called metopic style of decoration, is not unknown <strong>in</strong> the pa<strong>in</strong>ted<br />
pottery of <strong>South</strong> <strong>Russia</strong>. In <strong>South</strong> <strong>Russia</strong>, as everywhere else, the<br />
spiral <strong>and</strong> mae<strong>and</strong>er pottery is accompanied by numerous clay figures<br />
of very various primitive types, represent<strong>in</strong>g human be<strong>in</strong>gs—especially<br />
women—animals, pieces of furnittire, <strong>and</strong> sacred implements.<br />
The systematic excavations of Chvojka <strong>and</strong> of Volkov on the<br />
Dnieper, of Ernst von Stern <strong>in</strong> Bessarabia, of Hubert Schmidt <strong>in</strong><br />
Rumania, <strong>and</strong> of Hadaczek <strong>in</strong> Galicia, have shown that the men who<br />
produced the pa<strong>in</strong>ted pottery were by no means wholly primitive :<br />
they were no longer hunters or nomads: they dwelt <strong>in</strong> villages,<br />
sometimes fortified ; owned houses of a common neolithic form,<br />
half cave, half hut ; lived on agriculture ; <strong>and</strong> had a great number of<br />
domestic animals at their disposal. We have no decisive evidence as<br />
to their mode of burial. The best-preserved pots <strong>and</strong> figur<strong>in</strong>es were<br />
found neither <strong>in</strong> houses nor <strong>in</strong> tombs, but <strong>in</strong> curious structures<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, a Roman columbarium, on the other,<br />
a temple for religious ceremonies connected with funerals. These<br />
structures are sometimes of considerable size ;<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
they were roofed, <strong>and</strong>