Iranians and Greeks in South Russia - Robert Bedrosian's Armenian ...

238
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Chicago, 1914 ; Sino-Iranica, Chicago, 1919
Museum of Natural History in Chicago, Anthropological Series).
17. Supposed influence of China on South Russia. Reinecke, Zeitschrift fur Ethnologie,
xxviii (1896), i ff. and xxix (1892), 141 ff. ; Munsterberg, 1.1., i, 36 S. ; Minns, 280.
(all, except the first, publications of the Field
18. The ' Siberian ' plaques in China. Minns, 280 ; Sfr Hercules Read, Man, 1917,
I ff., pi. A ; Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, June 1918, 135 ff.
19. Scythian influence on Central and Eastern Russia. A. M. Tallgren, Die Kupfer- und
Bronzezeit in Nord- und Ostrussland : I. Die Kupfer- und Bronzezeit in Nordwestrussland.
Die altere Metallzeit in Ostrussland, Helsingfors, 191 1 ; //. L'epoque dite d'Ananino dans la
Russie orientale, Helsingfors, 1919 (with full bibliography), cf.
au Mus^e historique de Finlande a Helsingfors, Helsingfors, 1918.
idem. Collection Zaoussailov
20. Animal style in the Perm district. Hj. Appelgren-Kivalo, ' Die Grundziige des
skythisch-permischen Ornamentstiles ', Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakanskirja
(Journal of the Finnish Archaeological Society), xxvi (1912) ; idem, ' The Main Features of
the Scytho-Permian Ornamental Style ' (in Russian) , Proceedings of the Fifteenth Archaeological
Congress at Novgorod, 1914, vol. i ; A. Spitsyn, 'Antiquities of the Chud folk on the Kama
in the Teploiikhov Collection ', M.A.R. 26, St. Petersburg, 1902 (in Russian).
21. North German animal style. B. Salin, Die altgermanische Thierornamentik, Stock-
' holm, 1904 ; Appelgren-Kivalo, Om den s. k. Karolingiska stilens ursprung ' (On the
Origin of the so-called Carolingian Style), Opuscula archaeologica O. Montelio dicata, 1913 ;
Br0gger, Oseberg-skibet, Cristiania (vol. i, 1918 ; vpl. iii, 1920).
CHAPTER IX
The current view which denies the existence of any link connecting the history
of Slavonic and the history of pre-Slavonic Russia or rather the possibility of finding
such links is expressed in the leading works on Russian history, e. g. V. O. Kluchevski,
A History of Russia (transl. by C. J. Hogarth), vol. i (London and New York, 191 1) ;
S. Platonov, Lectures on Russian History, Petrograd, 1917 (the latest edition accessible
to me), &c. D. Bagalei's point of view, in his History of Russia, Charkov, 1912, is different
but his treatment of the two periods is apposition not connexion. The same must be said
of the works of Hrushevski on the history of the Ukraine (M. HruSevsky, Geschichte des
Ukrainischen Volkes, i, Leipsic, 1906, cp. Abrege de I'histoire de I'Ukraine, Paris, 1920).
The only scholars who have felt (rather than proved) this connexion are the archaeologists,
e. g. Zabelin {History of Russian Life) and Kondakov. Compare my forthcoming article,
' Les origines de la Russie Kievienne ', Revue des Etudes Slaves, 1922. For the archaeological
data on which my summary is based, see the preceding chapters. For the Germans
on the Dnieper, see the works of Arne quoted on ch. vi, no. 16.
: