BazermanMoore

214 References
Moore, D. A., Swift, S. A., Sharek, Z., & Gino, F. (2007). Correspondence bias in performance
evaluation: Why grade inflation works. Tepper Working Paper 2004-E42. Available at
SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=728627.
Moore, D. A., Tetlock, P. E., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). Conflict of interest and the
case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management
Review, 31(1), 10–29.
Moran, S., Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Getting more out of analogical training
in negotiations: Learning core principles for creating value. Negotiation and Conflict Management
Research.
Morewedge, C. K., Shu, L. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Owning, not selling, causes the
endowment effect. Talk presented at the Society of Judgment and Decision Making, Houston.
Morris, M. W., & Moore, P. C. (2000). The lessons we (don’t) learn: Counterfactual thinking and
organizational accountability after a close call. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 737–
765.
Murnighan, K. K., Cantelon, D. A., & Elyashiv, T. (2004). In J. A. Wagner, J. M. Bartunek, &
K. D. Elsbach (Eds.), Advances in qualitative organizational research (Vol. 3). New York:
Elsevier/JAI.
Mussweiler, T., & Englich, B. (2005). Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying
mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 133–143.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the
anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
35(2), 136–164.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000). The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of
anchoring tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1038–1052.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2001). The semantics of anchoring. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 234–255.
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering
the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 26(9), 1142–1150.
Nalebuff, B. (1987). Puzzles: Choose a curtain, duelity, two point conversions, and more.
Economic Perspectives, 1(1), 157–163.
Nalebuff, B. J., & Ayres, I. (2003). Why not? How to use everyday ingenuity to solve problems big
and small. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). Perspectives for understanding negotiation: Viewing
negotiation as a judgmental process. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 33–55.
Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (1989). Experience, expertise, and decision bias in negotiation:
The role of strategic conceptualization. In B. Sheppard, M. H. Bazerman, & P. Lewicki
(Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. Intelligence, 3(3), 217–227.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of
General Psychology, 2, 175–220.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-andadjustment
perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 39, 228–241.
Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1993). Negotiating successful research collaboration. In J. K.
Murnighan,(Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.