12.12.2022 Views

BazermanMoore

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Daly, H., 126

Damasio, A. R., 85, 86

Damasio, H., 85, 86

Dana, J., 132–133

Darley, J. M., 32, 135

Dasgupta, N., 126

Davis, M. S., 199

Dawes, R. M., 127, 133, 182–183, 184,

188

Dawson, E., 95

Daytrading, 145–147

Dealcrafting, 159

Death penalty, evidence for and

against, 30

Debiasing, 196–197

analogical reasoning for, 191–193

of judgment, 189–191

DeBondt, W. F. M., 142

Decision analysis

linear models in, 181–182

tools for, 181

Decision-analytic approach, to

negotiations, 152–154

Decision making

affect heuristic and, 85

anchoring bias and, 34

availability heuristic and, 18–21

confirmation bias and, 30

descriptive models in, 5

emotional influences on, 96–99

expected-value decision rule and,

62–63

expertise for, 186–188

neglect of context and, 58

prescriptive models in, 5

regret avoidance and, 98–99

risk and, 67

separating initial from related future

decisions, 104–105

strategic conceptualization of, 188

strategies for improving, 179–199

taking outsider’s view and, 193–195

Decision-making biases, 96

Decision-making process

change and, 10

rational, 2–3

Decision rules, for mental accounts,

74

Decision theory, resolving want/

should conflict with, 88–89

Declining marginal utility of gains,

63

DeDreu, C. K. W., 81

Den Ouden, E., 39

Depken, C. A., 119

DePodesta, P., 180

De Quervain, D. J.-F., 122

Descriptive decision-making models, 5

Devaluation, fixed-pie assumption

and, 169

De Waal, F. B. M., 119

Dhar, R., 86

Dictator game, 118, 133

Diekmann, K. A., 94, 172

Dietz, J., 129

Dijksterhuis, A., 90

Diltz, J. D., 146

Disclosure, conflicts of interest and,

130

Discounting

fairness and, 115–116

of future, 126–127

temporal differences and, 87–88

Disease vaccination, pseudocertainty

effect and, 68–69

Disgust, 96

Disjunctive-events bias, 34–35

Distribution, of price offers, 56f

Ditto, P. H., 95

Dividing a Pie problem, 192

Dollar auctions, 106, 111

Dougherty, T. W., 33, 185

Dow 36,000 (Glassman and Hassett),

138

Duncan, B. L., 33

Dunkelberg, W. C., 194

Dunning, D., 37, 90, 93, 95

Economic decision making, fairness

and, 114–116

Economics, resolving want/should

conflict with, 88

Egalitarianism, stereotypes and, 127

Egeth, H., 47

Egypt, Camp David Accords and,

156–158, 157f

Einhorn, H. J., 182, 185, 186

Electronic trading, 145–146

Elson, S. B., 134

Elyashiv, T., 123

Emotion

cognition and, 84–89

controls on, 99–100

decision making and, 96–99

fairness decided by, 116

mood-congruent recall and, 97–98

moral judgments and, 134

neutralizing effect on decisions,

99–100

regret avoidance and, 98–99

in ultimatum game, 118

Employment interviews, 184–186

Endowment effect, 73, 159

emotional state and, 97

Englich, B., 31, 33

Enron, 122–123, 131

Entrapment, 102

Entrepreneurs

base-rate insensitivity and, 22

positive illusions of, 93

Environment

decisions about, 10, 126–127

joint vs. separate preference

reversals and, 80

Epelbaum, M., 169

Epley, N., 31, 34, 37, 40, 78–79, 124,

125

Equality, in decision making,

116–117

Equality norms, perverse

consequences of, 121

Erev, I., 91

Escalation

of commitment, 101–113

Index 225

competitive escalation paradigm,

105–108

unilateral escalation paradigm,

103–105, 108

Ethics

bounded, 6, 122–134

codes of, 130

in decision making, 113–135

linear model uses and, 182–183

profits and, 135

training in, 135

Evaluability hypothesis, 81

Evaluation

joint vs. separate preferences in,

79–81

mental accounting for, 74

Evidence

biased perception of, 95

biased search for and interpretation

of, 30

Exchanges, endowment effect in, 73

Executive ethics, profits and, 135

Expectations, self-serving bias and, 94

Expected-utility theory, 71. See also

Utility

Expected value, 67

decision analysis and, 181

Expected-value decision rule, 62–63

Experience, in negotiations, 188

Expertise, for decision making, 186–

188

Exploitation, camouflaging

intentionality behind, 132–133

Exponential discounting, 87

Fairness

in decision making, 113–135

perceptions of, 113–122

punishment of unfair treatment,

121–122

standards of, 121

‘‘unfair’’ ultimatums and, 116–119

Fallacies, conjunction, 27–28

Favoritism, in-group, 125–126

Favors, bounded ethicality and, 125–

126

Fear, 96

Feder, B., 107, 108

Feedback, 189

Fehr, E., 119, 122, 126

Fidelity’s Magellan Fund, 8

Fiedler, K., 39

Fields, W. C., 101

Finance, behavioral, 137–138

Financial decisions

emotions and, 97

psychology of poor investments and,

138–145

Finucane, M., 9, 80, 85

Fischbacher, U., 122, 126

Fischer, D., 94

Fischhoff, B., 37, 38, 39, 68, 69, 91,

189

Fisher, R., 153

Fiske, S. T., 123

Fixed pie assumption, of negotiation,

168–169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!