BazermanMoore

218 References
Simons,D.J.,Chabris,C.F.,Schnur,T.,&Levin,D.(2002).Evidence for preserved representationinchangeblindness.
Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 11(1),
78–97.
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. (2003). What makes change blindness interesting? In D. E. Irwin & B.
Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Simons,D.J.,&Rensink,R.A.(2005).Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16–20.
Simonsohn, U., Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G., & Ariely, D. (2008). The tree of experience in the
forest of information: Overweighing experienced relative to observed information. Games and
Economic Behavior.
Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational
Behavior, 14, 231–266.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich,
D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive
judgment (pp. 397–420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slovic, P., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). On the psychology of experimental surprises. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3(4), 544–551.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Response mode framing and information
processing effects in risk assessment. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), New Directions for methodology
and social and behavioral science: Question framing and response consistency. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1982). Characterizing perceived risk. In R. W.
Kataes & C. Hohenemser (Eds.), Technological hazard management. Cambridge, MA:
Oelgesschlager, Gunn and Hain.
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 15(6), 323–325.
Soll, J. B., & Klayman, J. (2004). Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 299–314.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the
rationality debate. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.
Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision
making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(5), 393–422.
Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups:
Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
63(3), 426–434.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased
information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6),
1467–1478.
Stasser, G., Vaughn, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: the benefits
of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational
Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 102–116.
Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen
course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 16(1), 27–44.
Staw, B. M. (1980). Rationality and justification in organizational life. In B. M. Staw & L. L.
Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management
Review, 6(4), 577–587.
Staw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and
survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 474–494.