12.12.2022 Views

BazermanMoore

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mental Accounting 75

systematically higher spending from someone with $100,010 net wealth than from

someone with $100,000 net wealth. Yet Milkman, Beshears, Rogers, and Bazerman

(2008), working with an online grocery ordering and delivery service, find people

spend more at the grocery store after they have just received a ‘‘$10 off’’ certificate.

To be specific, $2 of the $10 goes to increased purchases. The ease with which people

spent their newfound wealth is consistent with Thaler’s behavior, though on a

more mundane scale.

Similarly, Shafir and Thaler (2006; Thaler, 1999) asked a group of subscribers to a

wine newsletter to consider the following problem:

Problem 13. Suppose that you bought a case of a good 1982 Bordeaux in the futures market

for $20 a bottle. The wine now sells at auction for about $75 per bottle. You have

decided to drink a bottle.

Which of the following best captures your sense of the cost of your drinking this bottle?

a. $0

b. $20

c. $20 plus interest

d. $75

e. –$55 (you’re drinking a $75 bottle for which you paid only $20)

Shafir and Thaler (2006; Thaler, 1999) report that the percentages for each of the

answers were (a) 30 percent, (b) 18 percent, (c) 7 percent, (d) 20 percent, and (e) 25

percent. The authors note that the newsletter was published by an economist, Orley

Ashenfelter, and that most of the respondents who answered ‘‘d’’ were also economists—the

answer consistent with economic analysis. The rest of us do not think about

the value of our assets based on what they are currently worth. Rather, we either treat

costs as something that we have already expensed away (option a), as the cost that we

paid (option b), or in terms of the value of the transaction (option e—you made money

by making a good purchase).

Your mental accounts can also affect your satisfaction with outcomes that you did

not choose. Consider the following two outcomes (adapted from Thaler, 1985):

Outcome A. You receive a letter from the IRS saying that you made a minor arithmetic

mistake in your tax return and must send them $100. You receive a similar letter the same

day from your state tax authority saying you owe them $100 for a similar mistake. There are

no other repercussions from either mistake.

Outcome B. You receive a letter from the IRS saying that you made a minor arithmetic

mistake in your tax return and must send them $200. There are no other repercussions

from the mistake.

Which situation would be more upsetting? Most people are more upset by Outcome

A, the two small losses, than by Outcome B, the one larger loss, despite the fact

that the two outcomes are equal in financial terms. This emotional reaction is consistent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!