European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals
European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals
European Journal of Scientific Research - EuroJournals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
421 Cihat Polat<br />
strategic management literature, giving no clear picture <strong>of</strong> the potential value and usability <strong>of</strong> such a<br />
tool in strategic decision-making context. This points out the necessity <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive and<br />
thorough review and discussion <strong>of</strong> the topic in order (iii) to clarify the issue and make a conceptual<br />
framework. To do this, the paper extracts and filters some <strong>of</strong> the relevant information in the literature<br />
and puts them together in order to present a brief and comprehensive picture. In this manner, the paper<br />
attempts (iv) to fill some <strong>of</strong> the gap in the literature by pointing out to the potential <strong>of</strong> forecasting as a<br />
strategic tool and highlighting its functionality in various macro and micro environmental and strategic<br />
decision areas, which is not adequately discussed either in the forecasting or strategic management<br />
literature. It also draws a theoretical frame <strong>of</strong> to what extent forecasting can be utilised in various areas<br />
and presents a judgemental outline within this theoretical view. Thus, the paper also attempts (v) to<br />
draw the attention <strong>of</strong> both practitioners and academicians to ‘forecasting’ as a strategic decision tool. It<br />
additionally points out new application and evaluation areas for both strategic managers and<br />
forecasting researchers, and suggests potentially productive directions for future research.<br />
The paper is organised in six main parts. The second part discusses the forecasting in the<br />
strategic context. The third and fourth parts discuss the potentials <strong>of</strong> forecasting with respect to the<br />
internal and external environments <strong>of</strong> a company, respectively. The fifth part discusses the criticism <strong>of</strong><br />
forecasting to strategic decision context. Finally, the last part contains the summary and conclusion.<br />
‘Forecasting’ in the Strategic Management Context<br />
Surviving in highly competitive markets and adapting to new states require both strategic thinking and<br />
utilising all the available information about the future, as well as that about the present. Nevertheless, it<br />
may not always be readily available the information required about the future. Even though it is<br />
possible to obtain a part <strong>of</strong> those data and/or information (e.g. inflation figures, growth forecasts,<br />
exchange rates) from external sources, firms mostly produce and obtain the required data (e.g. the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> future stocks, cash flows, market shares) themselves within their own bodies. Moreover,<br />
firms, themselves, may also have to produce some <strong>of</strong> the external data needed (e.g. inflation rates and<br />
exchange rates) for themselves, which could normally be obtained from external providers otherwise.<br />
Strategic management is applied in three different levels: Corporate, business, and functional<br />
levels (Hill & Jones, 1992). In fact, the functional level management is the main management unit<br />
where the strategies in a company are put into action. In strategy formation, the business and corporate<br />
level managers need and use the information being fed from the functional level. Forecasting activities<br />
can take place anywhere in these three levels based on the managerial needs and forecasting problems.<br />
However, as we get from top to bottom <strong>of</strong> managerial levels, the more intensive and more frequent<br />
forecasting function is utilised.<br />
On the other hand, strategic decisions mainly focus on creating ‘competitive advantages’ and<br />
differ from other daily or operational decisions from several aspects. Some <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
strategic decisions are that (i) they are made less frequently than (e.g. daily) operational decisions; (ii)<br />
they are generally more costly (in terms <strong>of</strong> the decision-making process e.g. may require longer time<br />
and more money, and the alternative costs) to make compared to other type <strong>of</strong> decisions; (iii) the<br />
consequences may be too severe for the firm; (iv) it generally requires background work and longer<br />
time to make; (v) they may normally require more and detailed information (e.g. data and (full)<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> the situations, which may not be a pre-condition for ordinary daily decisions). The<br />
decisions such as market segmentation, new product development, application <strong>of</strong> new manufacturing<br />
process, selection <strong>of</strong> a new distribution channel, and application <strong>of</strong> a new marketing mix, all can be<br />
considered as strategic decisions. In addition to these, some decisions may be an ordinary type but<br />
might have strategic consequences (e.g. making a new purchase agreement and finding a new supplier<br />
for a company in a critical industry where the number <strong>of</strong> suppliers might be very limited, which may<br />
completely change the cost <strong>of</strong> production or may provide sustained raw material supply). Similarly, the<br />
major decisions directed at obtaining substantial cost reductions can significantly contribute to gaining<br />
competitive advantages and, that is why, can be considered as a strategic type.