09.01.2013 Views

The cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament - The Search For ...

The cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament - The Search For ...

The cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament - The Search For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

138 THE CUNEIFORM INSCRIPTIONS AND THE 0. T.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> second passage X. 6, to which reference has been<br />

made, "presents" nn^O are mentioned which were given to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Great King. How far this involved a recognition of <strong>the</strong><br />

supremacy of Assyria, we do not know, since <strong>the</strong> contem-<br />

porary Assyrian records are missing. It may be readily<br />

understood from <strong>the</strong> way in which <strong>the</strong> Assyrians were<br />

accustomed to regard such "presents" or "gifts" (Assyr.<br />

m<strong>and</strong>at(t)u, raad(d)atu), that <strong>the</strong>se despatches of<br />

tribute were not altoge<strong>the</strong>r unaccompanied by such a<br />

440 recognition of supremacy. Never<strong>the</strong>less we perceive from<br />

this passage that <strong>the</strong> ties of dependence which united Nor-<br />

<strong>the</strong>rn Palestine to Assyria, <strong>and</strong> which had been reestablished<br />

by Ramm^nnirar about 800 B. C, had meanwhile become<br />

considerably relaxed; see above Vol. I, pp. 206 — 208.<br />

6. ^b Memphis; see note on Is. XIX. 13, p. 82.<br />

X. 14. <strong>and</strong> all thy fortresses will be laid waste, as<br />

Shalman laid waste Beth- Arb' el on <strong>the</strong> day of battle. It seems<br />

natural to underst<strong>and</strong> by "Shalman" (]P^tt') an Assyrian<br />

ruler, that is to say a Salmanassar, Assyr. Salmanu-<br />

of Juda" may refer to <strong>the</strong> losses sustained by <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn kingdom,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> overthrow by Tiglath-Pileser of <strong>the</strong> confederacy supported by<br />

king Uzziah (Azariah) ; see Vol. I, pp. 209 foil. This we might refer<br />

to <strong>the</strong> year 740 B. C. <strong>The</strong> subservient conduct of Ephraim, on <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, would correspond with <strong>the</strong> payment of tribute by Menahem<br />

(2 Kings XV. 19), to which <strong>the</strong> eponym- canon enables us to assign<br />

<strong>the</strong> date 738 B. C. Nothing is said about subservience on <strong>the</strong> part<br />

of Juda. It is true that Juda suffered by <strong>the</strong> brunt of war, but<br />

honour was not sacrificed. This is exactly in accordance with what<br />

we o<strong>the</strong>rwise know respecting Uzziah (Azariah) ; comp. Vol. I, p. 245.<br />

—Lastly, <strong>the</strong> reader will observe that in <strong>the</strong> comment on X. 14<br />

Di\ Schrader expresses doubts as to <strong>the</strong> identification of "Shalman"<br />

with Salmanassar III, thus invalidating one of <strong>the</strong> grounds on which<br />

his hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, that Jareb = Asurdanilu, is made to rest.—<strong>The</strong>re can<br />

be little question that no Assyrian monarch better deserved <strong>the</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>t<br />

of "combatant" or "struggler-king" than Tiglath-Pileser U.— Translator.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!