09.01.2013 Views

The cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament - The Search For ...

The cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament - The Search For ...

The cuneiform inscriptions and the Old Testament - The Search For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

320 THE CVNEIFOBM INSCRIPTIONS AND TEE 0. T.<br />

pare <strong>the</strong> Assyrian dagalu 'to gaze upon' (with interest, affection or awe).<br />

From <strong>the</strong> same root we have d i g 1 u 'banner' (an object of contempla-<br />

tion), comp. Ps. XX. 6, see Glossary sub voce ^y\- This appears to<br />

be a more satisfactory interpretation than that which is based on <strong>the</strong><br />

comparison of <strong>the</strong> Arabic |J>^0 'to cover' — <strong>the</strong> noun ^jr| banner be-<br />

ing explained as that which covers up <strong>the</strong> pole upon which it is car-<br />

ried. — <strong>The</strong> truth appears to be that <strong>the</strong> original sense of <strong>the</strong> verb<br />

^JT] is 'to gaze at' from which <strong>the</strong> subst. ^'yr\ designates 'banner' as<br />

being <strong>the</strong> object gazed at. In this primary sense <strong>the</strong> passive partic.<br />

^>\yT\ is to be understood in <strong>the</strong> above quoted passage (Song of Songs<br />

T<br />

V. 10). But ^yT\ is also to be taken as a denommative from <strong>the</strong> subst.<br />

^JT] meaning 'bear a banner'. Thus in Song of Songs VI. 4. 10 <strong>the</strong><br />

Niphal ni^illi signifies 'bannered hosts' <strong>and</strong> in Ps. XX. 6 <strong>the</strong> Kal<br />

^j|"l^ should be rendered 'bear our banner'. Fried. Delitzsch's inter-<br />

pretation of this last passage is very forced. Possibly we ought to<br />

read ^Tjj;3 (LXX).<br />

Vol. II p. 161 foil. On <strong>the</strong> subject of Biblical chronology during<br />

<strong>the</strong> regal period <strong>the</strong> reader may also consult Geo. Smith, Assyi-.<br />

Eponym Canon, chaps I <strong>and</strong> VII ; Samuel Sharpe, Hebrew Nation <strong>and</strong><br />

Literature pp. 381 foil. 389 foil.; Wellhausen, Einleitung in das A. T.<br />

p. 264 foil., Prolegg. zur Gesch. Isr. (1883) p. 285 foil.; Robertson<br />

Smith, Journal of Philology X. p. 209 foil. Prophets of Israel p. 146<br />

foil. 413 foil, <strong>and</strong> Stade, Geschichte p. 88 foil. 558 foil. As mention<br />

has been made on several occasions of Prof. Kamphausen's scheme of<br />

chronology for <strong>the</strong> Hebrew royal period, it will not be inappropriate if<br />

I subjoin it here (see Chronologie der Hebr. Konige p. 32). <strong>The</strong><br />

bracketed dates are my own proposed alterations. I have also , con-<br />

sistently with ordinary usage, sometimes modified Kamphausen's dates<br />

by a year so as to make <strong>the</strong> date of <strong>the</strong> initial year of a king's reign<br />

identical with that of <strong>the</strong> final year of his predecessor.<br />

Saul 1037—1018<br />

David 1018—1011 (Judah), 1010—978 (over Israel <strong>and</strong> Judah)<br />

Solomon 978—938<br />

Rehoboam<br />

Jeroboam I 938—916

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!