10.01.2013 Views

DVD Demystified

DVD Demystified

DVD Demystified

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

132<br />

The Transfer Tango<br />

Chapter 3<br />

Of course, the option still remains to transfer the movie to <strong>DVD</strong>’s 4:3 aspect<br />

ratio instead of 16:9. At first glance, there may seem to be no advantage in<br />

doing this because 1.85 movies are so close to 16:9 (1.78). It seems simpler<br />

to do a 16:9 transfer and let the player create a letterbox or pan and scan<br />

version. But there are disadvantages to having the player automatically<br />

format a widescreen movie for 4:3 display: The vertical resolution suffers by<br />

25 percent, the letterbox mattes are visible on movies wider than 1.85, and<br />

the player is limited to lateral motion. In addition, many movie people are<br />

averse to what they consider as surrendering creative control to the player.<br />

Therefore, almost every pan and scan <strong>DVD</strong> is done in the studio and not<br />

enabled in the player. During the transfer from film to video, the engineer<br />

has the freedom to use the full frame or zoom in for closer shots, which is<br />

especially handy when a microphone or a piece of the set is visible at the<br />

edge of the shot.<br />

Many directors are violently opposed to pan and scan disfigurement of<br />

their films. Director Sydney Pollack sued a Danish television station for airing<br />

a pan and scan version of his Three Days of the Condor, which was<br />

filmed in 2.35 Cinemascope. Pollack feels strongly that the pan and scan<br />

version infringed his artistic copyright. He believes that “The director’s job<br />

is to tell the film story, and the basis for doing this is to choose what the<br />

audience is supposed to see, and not just generally but exactly what they<br />

are to see.” Years later, when talking about <strong>DVD</strong>, Pollack said, “<strong>DVD</strong> hasn’t<br />

changed my approach to filmmaking, but what it has changed radically is<br />

my emotional reaction to the afterlife of the films that I do. I was always terribly<br />

disturbed by the fact that the overwhelming majority of people who<br />

see the work that you do as a filmmaker do not ever see it in its original<br />

form. . . . More and more people were watching videos, which were more<br />

and more often being altered by panning and scanning. Those pictures were<br />

getting butchered on video. ...You have superb quality with <strong>DVD</strong>. Plus,<br />

you can see the movies in their original widescreen format, framed as they<br />

were intended.” 25 Some directors, such as Stanley Kubrick, accept only the<br />

original aspect ratio. Others, such as James Cameron, who closely supervise<br />

the transfer process from full-frame film, feel that the director is responsible<br />

for making the pan and scan transfer a viable option by recomposing the<br />

movie to make the most of the 4:3 TV shape.<br />

25 Interview in Widescreen Review, Issue 37, 2000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!