10.01.2013 Views

DVD Demystified

DVD Demystified

DVD Demystified

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

370<br />

Advantages of DV over <strong>DVD</strong>-Video<br />

Chapter 8<br />

Capacity. D-VHS has a much greater capacity than <strong>DVD</strong> (and DV), with<br />

a digital tape holding almost 50 gigabytes of data. Even though the real bit<br />

capacity of DV is significantly higher than D-VHS, DV tape is narrower.<br />

Recordable. As with VCRs, this is the difference that makes all the difference.<br />

The high compression required by <strong>DVD</strong>-Video makes it an unsuitable<br />

candidate for shooting and editing. Recordable <strong>DVD</strong> more likely will<br />

be the final destination of digital video files from DV cameras and editing<br />

systems. Since it is possible to store DV-format (I-MPEG) video on a <strong>DVD</strong>-<br />

ROM, this may become popular for quick-access archiving. D-VHS can<br />

record from a digital source, but a digital decoder also must be available for<br />

playback.<br />

Editing. A significant advantage of DV is that each frame is compressed<br />

individually, so they can be inserted, deleted, and combined in any order.<br />

This is especially useful for nonlinear digital editing systems. Because<br />

<strong>DVD</strong>’s MPEG-2 P and B frames rely on nearby frames, they must be decompressed<br />

and recompressed to make an edit within a group of pictures. This<br />

can degrade picture quality.<br />

Video. DV uses the same component digital format as <strong>DVD</strong>-Video, the<br />

only difference being the sampling system. DV uses 4:1:1 sampling for<br />

NTSC and 4:2:0 sampling for PAL. <strong>DVD</strong>-Video uses 4:2:0 sampling for both<br />

NTSC and PAL. Both sampling methods record the same amount of information<br />

but in slightly different ways, and the arguments are endless over<br />

which is better. DV’s I-MPEG compression removes much less information<br />

than <strong>DVD</strong>’s MPEG-2 compression but is correspondingly less efficient. DV<br />

video quality is superior to <strong>DVD</strong>’s average video data rate of 3.5 Mbps but<br />

is not noticeably different when <strong>DVD</strong> rates are increased to more than 5 or<br />

6 Mbps. D-VHS can record a digital video bit stream at up to 28 Mbps,<br />

which is more than adequate for even high-quality digital video formats<br />

such as those used for HDTV.<br />

Price. D-VHS tapes may cost more than <strong>DVD</strong> discs, even more than<br />

recordable discs in the long term, but they are much more cost-effective<br />

when measured in price per gigabyte.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!