MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN - TBC India
MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN - TBC India
MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN - TBC India
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7.3 Information/report flow and feedback mechanisms<br />
Information/report and feedback mechanism for this project have been divided into two<br />
categories: Program and Finance. Information flow and feedback mechanism for both are shown<br />
as separate diagrams.<br />
Program information/report and feedback mechanisms<br />
For programs, District Coordinator is the first source of information. District Coordinator who<br />
is responsible for coordinating activities and reporting for two districts would work alongside<br />
with the District TB Officer and the local NGOs working the SR in the implementation of the<br />
project activities. District Coordinator would get the information from them and provide it to<br />
the Sub Recipient on the monthly basis. SR Project Manager would receive the information,<br />
review it and provide feedback to the DC within 10 days. Within the same quarter, Project<br />
Manager would also validate this information and send it to the PMU M&E Officers on a<br />
quarterly basis.<br />
The information for the State Level Activities would be provided by the SR Project Manager as<br />
and when the activities are completed. The M&E Officers at the PMU would review the same<br />
and provide immediate feedback to the Project Manager. Within the quarter they would also<br />
validate the information.<br />
Diagram 2 below illustrates the information flow and feedback mechanism for Programs at the<br />
District level and State level.<br />
© World Vision <strong>India</strong>, Axshya <strong>India</strong> Project<br />
Monitoring and Evaluation Plan, October 2010 Page No 22