18.01.2013 Views

IRD-2900 Series Professional Integrated Receiver ... - TBC Integration

IRD-2900 Series Professional Integrated Receiver ... - TBC Integration

IRD-2900 Series Professional Integrated Receiver ... - TBC Integration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>IRD</strong>-<strong>2900</strong> <strong>Series</strong><br />

<strong>Professional</strong> <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Receiver</strong> Decoders<br />

LNB L.O. TYPE<br />

The LNB L.O. Type parameter defines the LNB oscillator type in use. Two<br />

standards are generally used: ‘Universal’ and ‘Wide Band’.<br />

In addition, the oscillator value can be manually configured.<br />

The LNB L.O. type can be acquired from satellite transponder information. Most<br />

satellites use the ‘Universal’ type of L.O. unless otherwise specified.<br />

NOTE<br />

Manual configuration of the oscillator frequency is rarely used and is intended<br />

only for advanced users.<br />

The following figure illustrates the LNB L.O. Type screen.<br />

LNB LNB L.O. Type<br />

1���� UNIVERSAL UNIVERSAL (9.75,10.6)<br />

(9.75,10.6)<br />

2���� WIDE WIDE WIDE BAND BAND (9.75,10.75)<br />

(9.75,10.75)<br />

3���� Ku Ku BAND<br />

BAND<br />

4���� C C BAND<br />

BAND<br />

5���� DiSEqC DiSEqC (9.75, (9.75, 10.6)<br />

10.6)<br />

Available LNB L.O. types are:<br />

• UNIVERSAL (9.75,10.6) – Defines LNB universal L.O. type<br />

• WIDE BAND (9.75, 10.75) – Defines LNB wide band L.O. type<br />

• Ku-BAND – Defines Ku-Band LNB L.O. type<br />

• C-BAND – Defines C-Band LNB L.O. type<br />

• DiSEqC (9.75, 10.75)<br />

NOTE<br />

When selecting the Ku-Band or the C-Band, you must manually set the L.O.<br />

frequency (see the following Section in this chapter).<br />

Scopus Documents (p/n 100793) Page 4-21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!