30.01.2013 Views

USPTO Performance and Accountability Report - U.S. Patent and ...

USPTO Performance and Accountability Report - U.S. Patent and ...

USPTO Performance and Accountability Report - U.S. Patent and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Providing Policy Advice <strong>and</strong> Expertise to<br />

Other USG Agencies<br />

The <strong>USPTO</strong> continued to provide policy advice <strong>and</strong><br />

technical expertise on IP administration, protection,<br />

<strong>and</strong> enforcement both domestically <strong>and</strong> internationally<br />

to the DOC <strong>and</strong> other federal agencies.<br />

The <strong>USPTO</strong> advised the Office of the United States<br />

Trade Representative during the WTO accession<br />

process of several countries in evaluating intellectual<br />

property rights (IPR) laws, regulations, <strong>and</strong><br />

practices of countries <strong>and</strong> their consistency with the<br />

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual<br />

Property.<br />

The <strong>USPTO</strong> provides policy advice <strong>and</strong> expertise to<br />

the U.S. Department of State regarding IP issues that<br />

arise in various agencies of the United Nations<br />

including WIPO <strong>and</strong> the World Health Organization,<br />

as well as the Organization for Economic Cooperation<br />

<strong>and</strong> Development.<br />

Providing Technical Expertise in Negotiation<br />

<strong>and</strong> Implementation of Bilateral <strong>and</strong><br />

Multilateral Agreements<br />

In FY 2012, the <strong>USPTO</strong> continued to provide expert<br />

technical advice on IP protection in connection with<br />

on-going negotiations <strong>and</strong> implementation of<br />

bilateral <strong>and</strong> multilateral agreements. For example,<br />

the <strong>USPTO</strong> played an active role in the ongoing TPP<br />

free trade agreement negotiations which seek to<br />

ensure an effective <strong>and</strong> balanced approach to intellectual<br />

property rights among the member countries.<br />

The <strong>USPTO</strong> worked closely with USTR to assist Korea,<br />

Colombia, <strong>and</strong> Panama with implementation of the<br />

IP provisions of their free trade agreements with the<br />

United States. Among other things, these agreements<br />

provide for state-of-the-art protection for U.S.<br />

trademarks such as exp<strong>and</strong>ing the definition of a<br />

trademark to include protection for non-visually<br />

perceptible marks, as well as recognizing the principles<br />

of priority <strong>and</strong> exclusivity in the relationship<br />

between trademarks <strong>and</strong> geographical indications.<br />

Improved transparency provisions provide interested<br />

parties the opportunity to oppose <strong>and</strong> cancel registrations<br />

<strong>and</strong> to know the reason for decisions with<br />

respect to registration. Finally, the agreements<br />

memorialized each country’s commitment to<br />

improving its trademark system by implementing an<br />

electronic application filing system <strong>and</strong> developing<br />

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS<br />

Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property<br />

<strong>and</strong> Director of the <strong>USPTO</strong>, David Kappos <strong>and</strong><br />

President of EPO signing the Joint Cooperative <strong>Patent</strong><br />

Classification (CPC) statement in October 2010.<br />

a public on-line database of trademark applications<br />

<strong>and</strong> registrations. This will save U.S. companies time<br />

<strong>and</strong> money <strong>and</strong> make it easier for them to take the<br />

necessary steps to protect their trademarks in these<br />

markets.<br />

The <strong>USPTO</strong> continued to play an active role in the<br />

negotiation of Science <strong>and</strong> Technology Agreements<br />

with several countries.<br />

Increasing the effectiveness of IP Attachés<br />

in Prioritized Countries/Regions<br />

The <strong>USPTO</strong> places a high priority on increasing the effectiveness<br />

of the IP systems in prioritized countries/regions.<br />

In 2012, The IP Attaché program instituted new vision<br />

<strong>and</strong> mission statements that clearly linked program<br />

objectives <strong>and</strong> priorities to the overall mission of the<br />

<strong>USPTO</strong>. St<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures, developed by<br />

the IP Attaché Task Force, were implemented.<br />

They require Attachés to: (1) consult with stakeholders<br />

to define <strong>and</strong> prioritize IP-related business objectives in<br />

their country <strong>and</strong> region; (2) build a matrix of U.S. <strong>and</strong><br />

foreign stakeholder associations <strong>and</strong> companies, <strong>and</strong><br />

their respective IP-related concerns; (3) identify any<br />

existing bilateral agreements that support our objectives;<br />

<strong>and</strong> (4) seek to negotiate bilateral agreements, or<br />

informal work plans, <strong>and</strong> associated metrics with host<br />

governments.<br />

www.uspto.gov<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!