02.02.2013 Views

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the JoLt fRoM BoLdt 121<br />

salmon, a staple <strong>of</strong> Indian life for nutritional <strong>and</strong> spiritual sustenance,<br />

while the Game Department controlled fishing for steelhead, a sea-going<br />

trout prized by the non-Indian anglers whose fees largely funded the<br />

agency. Indians were not allowed to net steelhead, which traditionally had<br />

helped sustain them during winter months. <strong>The</strong>y were also prohibited<br />

from selling any they caught on their reservations. 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> tribes believed the white man was the real “Indian giver,” breaking<br />

promises since the 1850s when the territorial governor, Isaac Stevens,<br />

signed treaties covering some 8,000 natives from Neah Bay at the tip <strong>of</strong><br />

the Olympic Peninsula to the Nisqually along Puget Sound. In return for<br />

surrendering their claims to much <strong>of</strong> their l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> agreeing to live<br />

henceforth on the reservations the Great Father had set aside for them,<br />

the Indians would receive payments over the next 20 years, plus assistance<br />

in learning agriculture <strong>and</strong> other help “becoming civilized.” Further,<br />

Stevens said, they would be protected from the encroachments <strong>of</strong><br />

the “bad” white men who had tried to harm them.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> the fish to the Indians seems to have impressed<br />

Stevens,” a dynamic 35–year-old frontier bureaucrat. “He did not intentionally<br />

reserve to the Indians any more rights than he thought necessary,<br />

but he understood that the one indispensable requirement for securing<br />

agreement <strong>of</strong> any kind from Pacific Northwest Indians was to assure<br />

their continued right to fish.” Each treaty he signed contains this provision:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> right <strong>of</strong> taking fish, at all usual <strong>and</strong> accustomed grounds <strong>and</strong><br />

stations, is further secured to said Indians in common with all citizens <strong>of</strong><br />

the Territory.” For the next 120 years, “in common with” was translated by<br />

the courts as “no different than.” Indians, in other words, were subject to<br />

state laws governing the resource. In particular, they were barred from<br />

net fishing on rivers <strong>and</strong> streams. 3<br />

<strong>State</strong> enforcement agents <strong>and</strong> Indian fishermen clashed <strong>of</strong>ten in the<br />

early 1960s. Willie Frank, the Nisqually elder whose magnificently wizened<br />

face belonged on a quarter, filed a petition with the federal court,<br />

accusing state enforcement agents <strong>of</strong> brutality. Frank asked for an independent<br />

investigation.<br />

Warren G. Magnuson, <strong>Washington</strong>’s senior senator, attempted to produce<br />

clarity with two Senate joint resolutions in 1964. <strong>The</strong> first recognized<br />

the tribes’ treaty rights but stipulated that <strong>of</strong>f-reservation fishing would<br />

be subject to state regulation. <strong>The</strong> second called for a federal buy-out <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>of</strong>f-reservation fishing rights. <strong>The</strong> state supported both; the tribes,<br />

increasingly emboldened, neither. <strong>The</strong> proposals died in committee. Five<br />

years later, Governor Evans embraced a ruling by the U.S. District Court

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!