02.02.2013 Views

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

confRontAtion And consensus 347<br />

memos. <strong>The</strong> news didn’t go down well, but they finally settled on a review<br />

team: Kean <strong>and</strong> Hamilton, with Gorelick <strong>and</strong> Zelikow doing the heavy<br />

lifting. “By that time most <strong>of</strong> the other Republicans also had full confidence<br />

that Jamie would do things right,” Gorton recalls, emphasizing<br />

that consensus was crucial to the credibility <strong>of</strong> the commission. “We<br />

never had a vote that was partisan—that was tied 5 to 5. In fact, you could<br />

count on one h<strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> times we voted at all. We worked out<br />

the difficult questions.” 9<br />

It’s easy to see why Gorton <strong>and</strong> Gorelick were so simpatico. She even<br />

talks like him, reeling <strong>of</strong>f measured compound sentences: “Slade would<br />

look at a problem that divided the commission <strong>and</strong> look for ways we could<br />

find common ground. Fortunately for me, the person to whom he turned,<br />

because I am similar in approach, was me. Working through issues like<br />

that, seeing how another person’s mind works, watching his dedication to<br />

taking the facts wherever they might go, was a remarkable experience for<br />

me <strong>and</strong> forged an unbreakable bond between the two <strong>of</strong> us.” That bond—<br />

<strong>and</strong> Gorton’s disdain for duplicity—led to one <strong>of</strong> the commission’s most<br />

dramatic moments.<br />

AttoRney geneRAL John AshcR<strong>of</strong>t was convinced the commission was<br />

plotting to portray him as lackadaisical about al-Qaida. His staff scrambled<br />

for evidence that the Justice Department had done due diligence<br />

prior to the terrorist attacks. Plopping down a sheaf <strong>of</strong> classified internal<br />

memos from Gorelick’s tenure at the department, they told Ash cr<strong>of</strong>t he<br />

could make a case that America’s guard was down because <strong>of</strong> her.<br />

“Had I known a terrorist attack on the United <strong>State</strong>s was imminent<br />

in 2001, I would have unloaded our full arsenal <strong>of</strong> weaponry against it,<br />

despite the inevitable criticism,” Ashcr<strong>of</strong>t assured the commission on<br />

April 13, 2004. “<strong>The</strong> simple fact <strong>of</strong> September 11th is this: We did not<br />

know an attack was coming because for nearly a decade our government<br />

had blinded itself to its enemies. Our agents were isolated by governmentimposed<br />

walls, h<strong>and</strong>cuffed by government-imposed restrictions, <strong>and</strong><br />

starved for basic information technology. <strong>The</strong> old national intelligence<br />

system in place on September 11th was destined to fail.” 10<br />

Ashcr<strong>of</strong>t charged that a 1995 memo had imposed evidence rules in terrorism<br />

cases that amounted to the “single greatest structural cause for<br />

September 11th.” It constructed “a wall that segregated or separated criminal<br />

investigators <strong>and</strong> intelligence agents” <strong>and</strong> kept them from sharing<br />

evidence. “Government erected this wall; government buttressed this<br />

wall <strong>and</strong>—before September 11—government was blinded by this wall.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!