02.02.2013 Views

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the giAnt KiLLeRs 169<br />

ute to debate. Here, the equivalent <strong>of</strong> the caucus meets very rarely. <strong>The</strong><br />

ability <strong>of</strong> an individual to contribute something to the ultimate process is<br />

much greater.” That said, Gorton observed that his party was not nearly<br />

as unified as Dodd thought. “We have no more agreement now within<br />

the party on many <strong>of</strong> the social issues which we may be dealing with later<br />

this year or early next year than the Democrats do, <strong>and</strong> perhaps even less.<br />

So, again, what is that direction? I’m pleased with the direction as far as<br />

economics is concerned. To the extent that we have a party platform<br />

which takes very, very rigid positions on some <strong>of</strong> the social issues, I don’t<br />

like it particularly.” 13<br />

Gorton was one <strong>of</strong> six GOP freshmen on the Budget Committee. <strong>The</strong><br />

others were Grassley, Quayle, Steve Symms <strong>of</strong> Idaho, Mark Andrews <strong>of</strong><br />

North Dakota <strong>and</strong> Bob Kasten <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin. All but Gorton had served<br />

previously in the House. <strong>The</strong> most junior “Giant Killer” quickly became<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the most influential.<br />

hAving pRoMised not to do so <strong>and</strong>, at 70, certainly old enough to know<br />

better, Ronald Reagan put both feet on the third rail <strong>of</strong> American politics<br />

in the spring <strong>of</strong> 1981. At the urging <strong>of</strong> David Stockman, his wunderkind<br />

budget director, Reagan endorsed raising the full retirement age for Social<br />

Security from 65 to 68 <strong>and</strong> dramatically reducing benefits for those<br />

who opted to take early retirement at 62. <strong>The</strong> plan would have saved $50<br />

billion over the next five years while shoring up the trust fund. Jubilant<br />

Democrats, seeing their first break in the political clouds, vowed to protect<br />

the mother <strong>of</strong> all entitlements <strong>and</strong> basked in the public’s outrage.<br />

Speaker O’Neill called the plan “despicable.” Claude Pepper, the 80-yearold<br />

chairman <strong>of</strong> the House Select Committee on Aging, stopped just<br />

short <strong>of</strong> pronouncing it the most infamous attack on Americans since<br />

Pearl Harbor. Reagan beat a hasty retreat. A resolution condemning any<br />

attempt to “unfairly penalize early retirees” was unanimously approved<br />

by the Senate. 14<br />

When in doubt, appoint a commission. As commissions go, however,<br />

this one had some bipartisan moxie, with Alan Greenspan as its chairman.<br />

Gorton said he wished they hadn’t all chickened out. <strong>The</strong>y should<br />

have just done it <strong>and</strong> endured the flak. Stockman was right, Gorton<br />

said. Adjust ments to the full retirement age <strong>and</strong> penalties for early retirement<br />

were imperative. Sooner or later—<strong>and</strong> sooner was better—<br />

Congress would have to make tough choices. Otherwise the Baby Boomers<br />

reaching retirement age in the 21 st Century would find the system

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!