02.02.2013 Views

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

The Gortons and Slades - Washington Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Let’s MAKe A deAL 211<br />

the old pro from West Virginia, quickly changed his vote to “yes” so the<br />

Democrats could move for reconsideration. Dole craftily called up other<br />

business <strong>and</strong> prevailed in a parliamentary chess match that stretched<br />

over the next four weeks. Evans, who had never wavered in his opposition<br />

to Manion, voted against the pivotal procedural motion to reconsider.<br />

It was unfair, he said, to make Manion undergo another roll call on the<br />

merits <strong>of</strong> his nomination. 4<br />

Dan Manion was headed for the federal bench.<br />

As quids pro quo go it was classic D.C. horse-trading, except that the<br />

stakes were higher than usual: a lifetime appointment to the federal bench.<br />

Democrats railed at Gorton’s perfidy. “Slade Gorton couldn’t deliver without<br />

selling out on his principles,” Adams said. Gorton was unrepentant.<br />

Absent the Dwyer dustup, he would have supported Manion, he said, because<br />

Indiana’s Republican senators, Quayle <strong>and</strong> Richard Lugar, assured<br />

him their nominee was no right-wing lapdog. Further, the American Bar<br />

Association rated Manion as qualified, albeit marginally. Gorton resented<br />

being characterized as insensitive to the bedrock principle <strong>of</strong> an independent<br />

judiciary. He said Dwyer’s appointment was in fact a victory in the<br />

battle to counter Reagan’s single-minded push to install conservatives on<br />

the bench. “I regret I cannot do it across the country.” 5<br />

Gorton’s deal-making was analyzed <strong>and</strong> editorialized from Seattle<br />

to Savannah. “Deals are made all the time in Congress,” <strong>The</strong> <strong>Washington</strong><br />

Post said. “But Mr. Gorton took it too far. . . . Judges aren’t pork.” Eric<br />

Pryne <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Seattle Times’ <strong>Washington</strong> Bureau wrote that the episode<br />

illustrated “an important distinction” between Gorton <strong>and</strong> Evans, “who<br />

are so alike in so many other ways. Simply put, the difference is this:<br />

Gorton has fewer qualms about engaging in the give <strong>and</strong> take, the wheeling<br />

<strong>and</strong> dealing, the horse-trading that is an essential but sometimes unpleasant<br />

element <strong>of</strong> political life. Evans, while not averse to compromising<br />

<strong>and</strong> negotiating, doesn’t play the game as readily or with as much<br />

relish.”<br />

“Slade has always loved the give <strong>and</strong> take, the rough <strong>and</strong> tumble,” Jay<br />

Fredericksen, a former Evans press secretary, told Pryne. “He knows how<br />

to use it. He’s very good at it. Dan is a different kind <strong>of</strong> guy. Slade will do<br />

what he has to do. Dan doesn’t like to bend.” One <strong>of</strong> Gorton’s press aides<br />

agreed, though his metaphors were less flattering to the boss. “This is not<br />

a perfect world,” said David Endicott. “If people want to play that game,<br />

Slade will play it. . . .He will get down in that trough with them.” Evans<br />

took pains to dispel the notion that he disapproved <strong>of</strong> what his friend <strong>and</strong><br />

seatmate had done. “I think all <strong>of</strong> the furor <strong>and</strong> the talk about Sen. Gorton

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!