24.11.2012 Views

Ibérica na região de Trás-os-Montes (NE Portugal) - Universidade ...

Ibérica na região de Trás-os-Montes (NE Portugal) - Universidade ...

Ibérica na região de Trás-os-Montes (NE Portugal) - Universidade ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CAD. LAB. XEOL. LAXE 26 (2001) The evolution of metapodial bones 369<br />

Figure 5. In<strong>de</strong>x of plumpness versus altitu<strong>de</strong> of site, left and in<strong>de</strong>x of plumpness and sex, right.<br />

This diagram shows that there is obviously no correlation between the mean in<strong>de</strong>x of plumpness<br />

of a cave- or <strong>de</strong>ninger bear population and the altitu<strong>de</strong> of the site. There is no correlation between<br />

the in<strong>de</strong>x of plumpness and sex too.<br />

known as U. <strong>de</strong>ningeri, but they do have<br />

nearly spelaeoid dimensions, and, in some<br />

cases, they become even bigger than normal<br />

cave bears do. The dimensions of the<br />

bears from the Hundsheimer Spalte differ<br />

from the <strong>de</strong>ninger-bears from<br />

Repolusthöhle (Styria) in a range from 6<br />

% until 16,6 % ! These differences could<br />

be sufficient to <strong>de</strong>fine a new species. The<br />

really small <strong>de</strong>ninger bears from the<br />

Repolust cave are so different, that it<br />

seems to be more correct to separate this<br />

form the other <strong>de</strong>ninger bears on the subspecies<br />

level. I would like to suggest the<br />

usage of the old terminus "<strong>de</strong>ningeroi<strong>de</strong>s",<br />

which was introduced into literature by<br />

Maria MOTTL (1947). She used this term<br />

to mark the peculiarities of this bear from<br />

which she believed that it was a cave bear.<br />

Now that it is clear that this bear belongs<br />

to the species U. <strong>de</strong>ningeri it should be<br />

used for the same purp<strong>os</strong>e. But now it will<br />

be Ursus <strong>de</strong>ningeri "<strong>de</strong>ningeroi<strong>de</strong>s"<br />

Furthermore, a really tiny metatarsal 5<br />

was found in the material of the<br />

Hundsheimer Spalte, which fits perfectly<br />

well into the range of robustness of Ursus<br />

arct<strong>os</strong>. But it is not only the plumpness,<br />

which is responsible for the difference to<br />

th<strong>os</strong>e of the cave bear, it is also the morphology,<br />

showing all the features of a<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>rn brown bear. In respect to the age<br />

of this site the metapodial in question is<br />

<strong>de</strong>scribed as Ursus cf. arct<strong>os</strong>, which is new<br />

to the fau<strong>na</strong>l list of this site as well as for<br />

the Lower Pleistocene.<br />

Another very interesting cave is the<br />

Win<strong>de</strong>ner Baerenhöhle. There were two<br />

different species of bears found: a big cave<br />

bear and a very big brown bear. These

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!